W1TTE — CS2 Stats

76561197980337475[U:1:20071747]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,581Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,682Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating23,976Top 25% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#32642 of 259173 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,889 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,976 +2,725 30 Aug – 29 Oct · 13 days played

24,084Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,889Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

20Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,889
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 112 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 23,976
+3,976 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,024 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	67.0%	48.2%	50.9%	above
Shot accuracy	11.5%	13.2%	13.7%	2.2% short
Kill/death ratio	1.21	1.07	1.09	above
Match win rate	46.6%	46.9%	48.4%	1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning63

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–33–8Last 10059%Win rateLWWLWWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

7–2–1 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

12–6–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9

Utility6.1

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.8

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning6.3

Utility6.1

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels4.8

Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time626ms+25ms

first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms

Headshot accuracy24.4%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 26.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 6–0 · cache, 23 Sept →

67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 12 Oct →

453msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · dust2, 12 Oct →

13–2Biggest win · dust2, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

13–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	53	33–20	62%	0.02
inferno	A	17	10–7	59%	0.01
cache	A	14	9–5	64%	0.03
mirage	D	9	3–6	33%	0.00
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	0.02
anubis	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

293,385Lifetime kills

1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players

9,418Matches

46.6%Match win rate

67.0%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players

11.5%Shot accuracy

25,684MVPs

5,185Hours (in match)

7,692Bombs planted

3,922Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47125,985

Desert Eagle43,546

M4A4 / M4A1-S40,197

P2000 / USP-S22,814

AWP14,593

Glock-188,269

P2504,378

SSG 083,797

Galil AR3,670

FAMAS3,434

Lifetime map wins

25,098dust2

22,661inferno

4,610nuke

2,623train

2,035vertigo

1,231cbble

325office

155lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

769Matches

52%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

79.7ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	22	55%	1.19	15.7
Anubis	20	80%	1.67	15.8
Inferno	20	50%	1.14	17.1
Dust2	18	67%	1.02	16.6
Mirage	11	64%	0.99	15.2
Nuke	6	50%	1.35	19.8
Overpass	3	33%	0.64	11.3
Vertigo	3	67%	1.31	13.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy

33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

80.6%Counter-strafing

7.7°Preaim

628msReaction time

46.4%T opening success

52.2%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

6.3%Flash assists

7.46HE damage / grenade

16.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4262 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	0.03	26%	29 Oct →
dust2	16–14	0.00	23%	29 Oct →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	24%	29 Oct →
dust2	3–13	0.04	39%	29 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.02	19%	28 Oct →
cache	16–14	0.04	17%	28 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.08	31%	28 Oct →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	22%	28 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	19%	27 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.05	29%	27 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.05	21%	27 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.07	18%	27 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.11	19%	27 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.07	27%	26 Oct →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	21%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.06	24%	26 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	24%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	28%	26 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.07	18%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.01	23%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	18%	23 Oct →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	22%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.10	23%	23 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.01	20%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.00	33%	21 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.07	32%	21 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.01	35%	21 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	25%	21 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.02	41%	21 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	13%	21 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.05	25%	20 Oct →
cache	16–14	0.05	15%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.06	33%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.05	25%	20 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	25%	20 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.04	15%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	22%	20 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	17%	18 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	17%	18 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.10	27%	18 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.04	14%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.09	31%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	26%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.00	13%	18 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.02	16%	16 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.12	20%	16 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.01	28%	16 Oct →
nuke	15–15	0.04	15%	16 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.13	18%	16 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	39%	15 Oct →
inferno	8–13	0.02	11%	15 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.04	19%	15 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.03	20%	15 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	21%	15 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.03	19%	15 Oct →
dust2	7–13	0.08	26%	14 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.04	22%	14 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.06	39%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.01	24%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	67%	12 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	16%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.05	29%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	20%	12 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.05	21%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.10	30%	11 Oct →
anubis	13–5	0.10	32%	11 Oct →
inferno	15–15	0.01	25%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.06	26%	11 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	14%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.05	31%	11 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	26%	8 Oct →
cache	13–6	-0.01	18%	8 Oct →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	44%	8 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.07	31%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.00	38%	8 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	30%	5 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.01	19%	5 Oct →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	21%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.07	26%	5 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.00	34%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	10%	4 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.19	26%	4 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	21%	4 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	30%	4 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	20%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.07	20%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.02	22%	29 Sept →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	29%	29 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.01	23%	29 Sept →
dust2	1–13	-0.01	23%	29 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.04	27%	29 Sept →
cache	13–5	-0.02	38%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.00	29%	25 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.06	26%	25 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	15%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.01	30%	24 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.01	19%	24 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.02	27%	24 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.04	30%	23 Sept →
cache	6–0	0.21	56%	23 Sept →