๐™ทแตƒสท๐™บ

๐™ทแตƒสท๐™บ โ€” CS2 Stats

US76561199888853219[U:1:1928587491]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

587Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
732Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,875Blue band ยท top ~34.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then โ€” still 587 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 8 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,875 -615 8 Mar โ€“ 20 Sept ยท 16 days played
12,69417,000peak 17,0008 Mar20 Sept
17,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-03-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,125 below peak (17,000)
  • -1,000 over 30 days ยท declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 โ€” 1,125 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=20,242), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate49.6%41.9%44.3%above
Shot accuracy0.0%9.6%11.8%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.820.981.030.22 short
Match win rate51.4%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐™ทแตƒสท๐™บPREMIER13,875 ยท Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning48
Utility49

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48โ€“44โ€“8Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLLWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’10pp win rate ยท +0.02 avg rating ยท +3.1pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’25ms reaction

Win rate โˆ’10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2โ€“3 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 10

  • 4โ€“5โ€“1 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 9โ€“9โ€“2 ยท 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support โ€” Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 33% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.8
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.00 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time604msโˆ’42ms
first โ…“ avg 646ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%โˆ’5.1%
first โ…“ avg 22.1% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating ยท 9โ€“0 ยท inferno, 23 Jul โ†’
50%Best headshot accuracy ยท 9โ€“2 ยท inferno, 26 Jul โ†’
375msFastest reaction time ยท 13โ€“9 ยท mirage, 20 Apr โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท mirage, 3 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5โ€“8In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map ยท 60% over 5infernoWeakest map ยท 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3619โ€“1753%0.02
infernoC156โ€“940%-0.03
ancientA127โ€“558%0.02
cacheB115โ€“645%-0.01
nukeC94โ€“544%0.01
dust2B63โ€“350%-0.01
anubisA53โ€“260%-0.01
eldoradoโ€”31โ€“233%-0.12
debrisโ€”10โ€“10%-0.19
vertigoโ€”10โ€“10%-0.09
overpassโ€”10โ€“10%-0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,960Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
640Matches
51.4%Match win rate ยท Top 10% of Blue band
49.6%Headshot % ยท Top 25% of Blue band
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,356MVPs
2,633Hours (in match)
787Bombs planted
428Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,486inferno
783nuke
719dust2
221vertigo
10train
7office

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
8.8ยฐPreaim
611msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
6.52HE damage / grenade
5.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8911% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage1โ€“130.0228%18 Sept โ†’
nuke7โ€“90.0920%17 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0621%17 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.078%17 Sept โ†’
inferno0โ€“3-0.040%1 Sept โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.0733%20 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“60.0722%18 Aug โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.089%18 Aug โ†’
ancient7โ€“2-0.030%18 Aug โ†’
nuke12โ€“12-0.0119%17 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0229%17 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“6-0.110%16 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.060%16 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0115%16 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0312%15 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“8-0.0513%9 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0313%9 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0116%8 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0118%8 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.0114%8 Aug โ†’
inferno15โ€“15-0.0114%4 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0729%4 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0323%3 Aug โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0345%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.1117%3 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0215%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0621%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“00.0223%3 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“20.1218%3 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.028%2 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.0715%1 Aug โ†’
mirage12โ€“12-0.0718%1 Aug โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0426%1 Aug โ†’
inferno16โ€“13-0.0419%31 Jul โ†’
eldorado0โ€“8-0.290%31 Jul โ†’
nuke9โ€“10.0417%31 Jul โ†’
eldorado9โ€“3-0.007%31 Jul โ†’
eldorado4โ€“9-0.0521%31 Jul โ†’
debris1โ€“9-0.190%31 Jul โ†’
inferno1โ€“9-0.2320%31 Jul โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0710%31 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0119%31 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“6-0.0917%30 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.006%30 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0230%30 Jul โ†’
mirage12โ€“00.028%30 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0115%30 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“30.0513%30 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0929%28 Jul โ†’
inferno4โ€“9-0.0127%28 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.1720%27 Jul โ†’
inferno2โ€“9-0.1240%27 Jul โ†’
inferno9โ€“20.0250%26 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.1324%25 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.097%25 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0421%24 Jul โ†’
inferno9โ€“00.2416%23 Jul โ†’
inferno9โ€“4-0.0221%23 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0313%7 May โ†’
inferno9โ€“7-0.1128%6 May โ†’
inferno4โ€“9-0.0843%6 May โ†’
cache13โ€“7-0.0415%5 May โ†’
cache12โ€“12-0.0227%5 May โ†’
cache4โ€“130.0132%4 May โ†’
cache0โ€“13-0.0420%4 May โ†’
cache13โ€“30.0824%4 May โ†’
cache13โ€“60.0522%3 May โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0615%23 Apr โ†’
inferno7โ€“9-0.013%22 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.1140%20 Apr โ†’
vertigo6โ€“13-0.0913%19 Apr โ†’
mirage12โ€“120.0432%19 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0129%17 Apr โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0233%17 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.1146%16 Apr โ†’
mirage4โ€“80.0419%16 Apr โ†’
mirage1โ€“70.0230%16 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0618%9 Apr โ†’
ancient1โ€“40.0514%1 Apr โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0122%1 Apr โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0818%26 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0624%25 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“6-0.0240%25 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0533%25 Mar โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.0113%24 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0014%24 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“5-0.048%24 Mar โ†’
nuke7โ€“90.0220%24 Mar โ†’
mirage4โ€“130.0518%24 Mar โ†’
mirage12โ€“120.0022%23 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0426%23 Mar โ†’
overpass7โ€“12-0.165%15 Mar โ†’
dust23โ€“13-0.0733%11 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.0035%11 Mar โ†’
ancient4โ€“13-0.0220%9 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0413%9 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“30.0317%9 Mar โ†’
anubis6โ€“130.0218%9 Mar โ†’
mirage0โ€“8-0.0725%9 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0214%8 Mar โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’