Lewizzz

Lewizzz — CS2 Stats

FI76561199878866700[U:1:1918600972]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

684Tracked matches41%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,239Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,039Purple band · top ~24.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,039 +1,154 3 Sept – 28 Oct · 28 days played
14,76118,674peak 18,6743 Sept28 Oct
18,695Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-08-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,635 below peak (18,674)
  • +1,039 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,961 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,631), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.5%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.021.03meets
Match win rate47.9%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLewizzzFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,039 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning73
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.4
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning7.3
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time568ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%−6.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.41Best match rating · 9–1 · eldorado, 18 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · dust2, 20 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · dust2, 20 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1810–856%0.02
mirageC156–940%0.02
dust2A148–657%0.01
nukeS139–469%0.07
infernoS107–370%0.08
cacheB84–450%0.08
anubisD82–625%0.03
poseidon—31–233%0.01
eldorado—32–167%0.16
debris—32–167%0.14
train—21–150%0.03
vertigo—21–150%0.09
rush_001—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,162Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,109Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
45.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
7,756MVPs
796Hours (in match)
1,970Bombs planted
1,650Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,258inferno
2,438dust2
2,324nuke
386vertigo
359train
41italy
37office
19lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

110Matches
53%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
77.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2552%0.9314.6
Mirage2162%1.0715.0
Anubis2055%1.2015.8
Dust21547%1.2015.7
Nuke1346%1.0716.0
Cache1145%1.1715.6
Inferno560%1.0516.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.2%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
558msReaction time
65.6%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
10.27HE damage / grenade
12.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.2255% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.2284% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–9-0.0422%14 Nov →
inferno9–30.1110%14 Nov →
inferno9–20.069%14 Nov →
cache13–100.097%12 Nov →
train10–00.0814%12 Nov →
anubis4–130.1211%11 Nov →
inferno7–90.0510%11 Nov →
inferno9–30.1713%11 Nov →
poseidon9–20.2320%11 Nov →
anubis3–130.0121%10 Nov →
inferno9–70.1422%10 Nov →
nuke9–20.1718%10 Nov →
nuke9–5-0.008%10 Nov →
inferno9–30.1718%10 Nov →
inferno9–60.0416%10 Nov →
nuke9–40.194%10 Nov →
poseidon4–9-0.1221%6 Nov →
poseidon5–9-0.083%6 Nov →
ancient13–110.1110%28 Oct →
nuke7–130.0211%28 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.054%27 Oct →
nuke13–70.1915%27 Oct →
cache10–13-0.049%26 Oct →
mirage15–150.038%26 Oct →
dust21–4-0.060%26 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0320%24 Oct →
mirage8–130.0013%24 Oct →
cache8–130.045%22 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0312%21 Oct →
dust213–16-0.017%21 Oct →
ancient10–130.0416%21 Oct →
anubis16–130.0016%20 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0010%20 Oct →
mirage13–30.057%20 Oct →
mirage13–50.0712%20 Oct →
nuke13–40.0512%20 Oct →
vertigo9–60.159%20 Oct →
ancient7–130.0218%13 Oct →
dust213–100.0614%13 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.021%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0210%10 Oct →
nuke13–40.1724%10 Oct →
dust26–130.0116%9 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.015%8 Oct →
mirage13–40.078%7 Oct →
ancient13–50.0510%6 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0510%6 Oct →
dust23–13-0.066%4 Oct →
dust213–100.0814%4 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0118%3 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.066%2 Oct →
mirage15–150.0114%30 Sept →
rush_0018–50.0312%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0111%30 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0112%28 Sept →
cache13–50.1317%28 Sept →
mirage8–130.0712%28 Sept →
anubis16–120.0817%27 Sept →
mirage13–100.0316%25 Sept →
cache13–40.1023%24 Sept →
nuke13–160.0723%24 Sept →
dust213–50.0313%24 Sept →
ancient4–130.0632%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0128%23 Sept →
ancient13–50.0923%22 Sept →
cache9–130.1415%17 Sept →
dust213–10.1415%17 Sept →
eldorado9–70.0938%16 Sept →
anubis6–130.059%15 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0125%15 Sept →
vertigo6–90.0314%15 Sept →
mirage16–130.0211%10 Sept →
cache8–130.1424%10 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0414%10 Sept →
inferno13–90.0911%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.069%6 Sept →
eldorado6–9-0.0115%6 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0115%5 Sept →
ancient13–100.0822%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0710%4 Sept →
anubis7–130.0120%3 Sept →
nuke13–70.0620%3 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0223%3 Sept →
mirage6–130.1534%3 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.029%3 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0022%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0215%24 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0212%24 Aug →
dust213–110.0012%24 Aug →
mirage3–130.0120%20 Aug →
dust22–00.01100%20 Aug →
debris9–40.2115%20 Aug →
eldorado9–10.4122%18 Aug →
train2–7-0.015%18 Aug →
nuke13–50.039%18 Aug →
nuke9–20.000%18 Aug →
debris8–80.0117%17 Aug →
dust213–80.038%17 Aug →
debris9–20.2110%17 Aug →
cache13–110.0614%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.