₭ⱤɆ₭

₭ⱤɆ₭ — CS2 Stats

AZ76561199827139369[U:1:1866873641]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

516Tracked matches76%Win rate2025Tracked since
531Hours in CS
CSDB Rating8.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,381Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2455 of 261546 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 516 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,381 +1,782 6 Sept – 3 Nov · 12 days played
26,58828,381peak 28,3816 Sept3 Nov
28,381Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,381
  • +975 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,619 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate42.2%43.8%44.8%2.6% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.331.021.03above
Match win rate58.4%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG₭ⱤɆ₭FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER28,381 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim99
Positioning59
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63–32–5Last 10063%Win rateLLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 40%
  • Avg reaction 356ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 440ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.9
Utility4.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 95% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.9
Positioning5.9
Utility4.2
Mechanics10.0
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time457ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 424ms → last ⅓ avg 457ms
Headshot accuracy28.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 4–13 · cache, 23 Oct →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 20 Sept →
156msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS4129–1271%0.06
infernoC188–1044%0.05
cacheS128–467%0.09
ancientC94–544%0.07
anubisS75–271%0.07
nukeS54–180%0.02
dust2—33–0100%0.05
vertigo—20–20%-0.03
debris—21–150%-0.07
fachwerk—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,452Lifetime kills
1.33K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
1,634Matches
58.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
42.2%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,301MVPs
531Hours (in match)
1,117Bombs planted
234Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,860dust2
1,883inferno
804nuke
389train
218vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

275Matches
60%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
76.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9559%1.2415.7
Dust26053%0.9813.4
Anubis5258%1.0214.5
Ancient3367%1.2316.8
Inferno1958%0.8713.6
Nuke1191%1.2618.3
Cache367%0.8513.3
Train250%0.8612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.1%Headshot accuracy
45.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.6%Spray accuracy
95.1%Counter-strafing
4.6°Preaim
450msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
2.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.2131 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–130.0526%25 Oct →
vertigo1–13-0.0567%25 Oct →
cache13–60.0833%25 Oct →
inferno13–70.0239%25 Oct →
mirage13–40.1635%25 Oct →
ancient13–50.0316%25 Oct →
mirage13–20.0533%25 Oct →
mirage13–30.1530%25 Oct →
mirage13–30.0719%24 Oct →
mirage13–40.0415%24 Oct →
mirage13–20.1035%24 Oct →
mirage13–50.1821%24 Oct →
mirage13–60.1944%24 Oct →
mirage8–130.0433%24 Oct →
anubis8–130.0328%24 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0636%24 Oct →
mirage13–70.1218%23 Oct →
ancient12–120.1633%23 Oct →
cache13–30.1727%23 Oct →
mirage13–30.1527%23 Oct →
mirage13–60.0121%23 Oct →
dust213–00.0624%23 Oct →
cache4–130.2440%23 Oct →
mirage13–10.0526%23 Oct →
cache6–00.1460%23 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0018%23 Oct →
nuke13–100.0825%23 Oct →
mirage13–00.028%11 Oct →
inferno2–20.0620%11 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0311%11 Oct →
cache13–70.0222%7 Oct →
anubis12–60.0522%7 Oct →
fachwerk13–110.0522%5 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.080%5 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.050%5 Oct →
mirage13–30.1018%5 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0017%5 Oct →
mirage13–70.1429%5 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.1133%5 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.040%5 Oct →
cache4–50.0843%5 Oct →
ancient3–130.0723%5 Oct →
dust213–60.1340%4 Oct →
inferno6–90.0321%4 Oct →
inferno9–70.0933%4 Oct →
inferno8–130.0513%2 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0323%2 Oct →
cache9–20.1021%2 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0371%2 Oct →
mirage11–130.0043%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.1327%29 Sept →
mirage13–20.0920%26 Sept →
mirage13–60.1223%26 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.120%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.0125%26 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0125%26 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0529%26 Sept →
cache13–40.0917%26 Sept →
debris1–9-0.250%26 Sept →
debris9–30.1117%26 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0125%26 Sept →
inferno13–20.1527%26 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0229%26 Sept →
cache13–00.0519%26 Sept →
ancient12–120.1223%25 Sept →
mirage13–70.1423%25 Sept →
mirage13–20.0927%25 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0324%25 Sept →
ancient13–0-0.0124%25 Sept →
cache12–120.0225%25 Sept →
inferno13–50.0667%23 Sept →
anubis13–70.2128%23 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0024%23 Sept →
ancient13–30.1224%23 Sept →
inferno13–60.1518%23 Sept →
anubis12–120.1034%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0228%22 Sept →
nuke13–30.1030%22 Sept →
cache13–60.0911%22 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0350%20 Sept →
mirage2–130.0775%20 Sept →
mirage6–130.0830%16 Sept →
inferno12–120.0441%16 Sept →
cache4–8-0.020%16 Sept →
anubis13–110.0823%16 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0114%14 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0418%14 Sept →
mirage13–100.1133%14 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0216%14 Sept →
mirage13–60.029%14 Sept →
inferno8–130.1012%14 Sept →
anubis13–70.1027%14 Sept →
mirage4–130.0250%13 Sept →
inferno13–40.0833%13 Sept →
inferno13–90.0723%11 Sept →
mirage13–70.0120%11 Sept →
mirage13–90.1617%11 Sept →
mirage13–60.0633%10 Sept →
mirage6–130.0627%10 Sept →
inferno13–90.1530%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches11-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.