hemo häkkeri

hemo häkkeri — CS2 Stats

US76561199818842711[U:1:1858576983]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

526Tracked matches43%Win rate2025Tracked since
435Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,340Light Blue band · top ~67.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,340 -989 23 Sept – 29 Oct · 20 days played
7,2749,610peak 9,61023 Sept29 Oct
9,974Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-09-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,270 below peak (9,610)
  • -1,601 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,660 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate45.8%39.9%42.0%above
Shot accuracy0.0%7.0%9.6%9.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.970.920.98meets
Match win rate45.6%42.3%43.8%above

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhemo häkkeriPREMIER7,340 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning49
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −103ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility3.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.9
Utility3.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time641ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 7 Oct →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · poseidon, 7 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 23 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 12 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
poseidonB2210–1245%0.01
nukeS1913–668%0.04
dust2A1610–663%0.01
infernoD144–1029%-0.02
anubisB105–550%-0.03
mirageD92–722%0.00
ancient—40–40%0.01
cache—21–150%0.01
office—11–0100%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.04
debris—11–0100%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,487Lifetime kills
0.97K/D · Top 50% of Light Blue band
712Matches
45.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Light Blue band
45.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Light Blue band
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,807MVPs
218Hours (in match)
483Bombs planted
185Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,214nuke
817inferno
370dust2
247vertigo
184office
30train
21lake
5ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.2%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
601msReaction time
48.4%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
11.25HE damage / grenade
4.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.497 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–9-0.179%2 Nov →
nuke13–90.0222%29 Oct →
mirage8–130.0113%29 Oct →
ancient10–130.0319%28 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0014%27 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0116%23 Oct →
dust213–2-0.067%23 Oct →
poseidon9–10.1030%23 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0912%23 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0318%19 Oct →
poseidon9–40.0111%15 Oct →
mirage12–160.0115%15 Oct →
nuke10–130.0520%15 Oct →
nuke13–110.0219%12 Oct →
dust213–00.0618%12 Oct →
nuke13–30.0015%12 Oct →
poseidon9–60.1026%12 Oct →
poseidon7–9-0.0225%12 Oct →
poseidon9–70.0113%12 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.1022%12 Oct →
nuke8–130.0221%8 Oct →
poseidon9–60.0238%7 Oct →
poseidon9–10.2452%7 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0014%7 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0421%7 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0718%7 Oct →
poseidon8–8-0.0613%7 Oct →
poseidon6–90.0232%7 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0121%7 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0516%6 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0229%6 Oct →
nuke13–40.0622%6 Oct →
nuke13–80.0517%6 Oct →
nuke10–20.0930%6 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0228%5 Oct →
dust216–130.0227%5 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0626%5 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0420%4 Oct →
nuke13–100.0216%4 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0324%4 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0422%4 Oct →
anubis9–130.0018%4 Oct →
office13–60.0315%4 Oct →
poseidon5–90.0222%4 Oct →
inferno7–130.009%4 Oct →
poseidon9–50.169%4 Oct →
mirage16–120.0314%3 Oct →
nuke13–110.0821%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0113%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0417%3 Oct →
inferno13–110.0923%3 Oct →
inferno9–60.0425%3 Oct →
vertigo9–50.0425%3 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0213%2 Oct →
poseidon7–9-0.0118%2 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0418%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0219%2 Oct →
nuke13–40.0922%2 Oct →
dust213–00.0926%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0215%2 Oct →
dust27–130.0313%1 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.037%1 Oct →
inferno8–80.0221%1 Oct →
poseidon9–7-0.010%29 Sept →
mirage13–90.0329%29 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0318%29 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0312%28 Sept →
cache13–90.0418%28 Sept →
dust28–130.0821%27 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.2415%27 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.025%27 Sept →
poseidon8–8-0.1112%27 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0414%27 Sept →
debris9–5-0.0222%25 Sept →
overpass9–7-0.0111%25 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.0116%25 Sept →
poseidon9–60.1524%25 Sept →
poseidon9–60.0920%25 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0218%25 Sept →
ancient12–120.0811%25 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0529%25 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0412%25 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0313%25 Sept →
nuke13–160.0117%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0222%25 Sept →
nuke13–30.1521%25 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0114%24 Sept →
nuke13–100.0411%24 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0813%24 Sept →
mirage9–130.0410%24 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0114%24 Sept →
dust216–130.0111%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0527%23 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0510%23 Sept →
inferno15–150.0713%23 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0314%23 Sept →
inferno12–30.0217%23 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.1040%22 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0126%22 Sept →
nuke9–20.0719%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.