Keisari Pirk

Keisari Pirk — CS2 Stats

FI76561199090898917[U:1:1130633189]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

421Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
999Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,234Light Blue band · top ~63.3% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,234 +2,307 25 Sept – 3 Nov · 27 days played
5,9278,654peak 8,65425 Sept3 Nov
8,857Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 420 below peak (8,654)
  • -120 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,766 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate42.6%39.9%42.0%meets
Shot accuracy8.4%7.0%9.6%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.030.920.98above
Match win rate42.0%42.3%43.8%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKeisari PirkPREMIER8,234 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning66
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateLWWWWWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −6.6pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 13–4–3 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility4.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time607ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 23 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · poseidon, 23 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 29 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 79% over 14infernoWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2111–1052%0.03
dust2B2010–1050%0.00
mirageS1411–379%0.01
infernoC145–936%0.00
anubisB137–654%0.01
ancientS75–271%0.01
poseidonB63–350%0.02
cache—41–325%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,325Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 25% of Light Blue band
1,783Matches
42.0%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band
8.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Light Blue band
3,984MVPs
539Hours (in match)
2,042Bombs planted
299Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,228nuke
1,295inferno
1,282dust2
1,215vertigo
459train
183lake
40cbble
30office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
44%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
75.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage933%0.7913.9
Ancient250%0.6810.5
Vertigo250%0.6110.0
Cache250%1.8018.5
Dust21100%1.0523.0
Anubis10%0.8416.0
Nuke1100%0.647.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
73.0%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
602msReaction time
61.9%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
12.66HE damage / grenade
7.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.43 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–160.0118%3 Nov →
nuke13–100.0811%29 Oct →
mirage13–110.0112%29 Oct →
anubis13–110.0122%28 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0313%27 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0012%26 Oct →
poseidon4–9-0.1123%25 Oct →
nuke15–150.0123%25 Oct →
ancient13–90.0318%25 Oct →
nuke9–130.0418%23 Oct →
dust213–20.0421%23 Oct →
poseidon9–10.1640%23 Oct →
inferno9–60.1731%23 Oct →
nuke15–150.0116%23 Oct →
vertigo8–8-0.0727%23 Oct →
dust216–130.0621%23 Oct →
mirage13–10.0022%23 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0017%23 Oct →
nuke13–80.0720%22 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0221%22 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0215%22 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0827%21 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0116%21 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0118%20 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0417%20 Oct →
ancient13–70.0320%20 Oct →
cache3–130.0118%20 Oct →
anubis13–90.0412%19 Oct →
nuke5–130.0325%19 Oct →
mirage13–80.0216%19 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0323%16 Oct →
poseidon9–40.1324%15 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0217%15 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.037%15 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0415%15 Oct →
nuke13–70.0128%11 Oct →
nuke13–80.0224%11 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.1024%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0510%11 Oct →
mirage13–80.1326%11 Oct →
anubis14–160.0514%9 Oct →
inferno11–130.0313%9 Oct →
dust213–30.0816%9 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0311%9 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0219%9 Oct →
mirage13–90.0111%8 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.1118%7 Oct →
dust214–160.0613%7 Oct →
nuke15–150.0310%7 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.029%6 Oct →
cache11–130.0117%6 Oct →
nuke13–40.047%6 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.044%6 Oct →
inferno13–110.0018%6 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0117%5 Oct →
dust216–130.0413%5 Oct →
nuke9–20.1122%5 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0518%5 Oct →
dust29–130.0218%5 Oct →
inferno13–110.0216%5 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0112%4 Oct →
anubis13–70.0826%4 Oct →
nuke13–100.1118%4 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0422%4 Oct →
inferno9–130.0016%2 Oct →
poseidon7–9-0.0315%2 Oct →
ancient6–130.0518%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0025%2 Oct →
nuke13–40.0326%2 Oct →
dust213–0-0.0516%2 Oct →
cache16–130.0418%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.078%1 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0122%1 Oct →
poseidon9–70.0612%29 Sept →
mirage13–90.038%29 Sept →
anubis8–130.0514%29 Sept →
dust26–130.0420%29 Sept →
inferno6–90.0732%29 Sept →
nuke13–50.0520%29 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0317%29 Sept →
dust210–130.0112%29 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0716%29 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.228%28 Sept →
nuke9–60.145%28 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.1014%28 Sept →
nuke8–80.009%28 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0114%28 Sept →
anubis13–80.039%28 Sept →
mirage13–90.0219%28 Sept →
inferno9–40.0321%28 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0015%27 Sept →
mirage13–20.0915%27 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0125%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.0123%26 Sept →
inferno13–110.0213%26 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0810%25 Sept →
ancient16–130.0414%25 Sept →
inferno7–130.0411%25 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0420%25 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0611%25 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.