Quicksr

Quicksr — CS2 Stats

WF76561199678973383[U:1:1718707655]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

565Tracked matches80%Win rate2024Tracked since
845Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,962Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57645 of 261688 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 914 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 565 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,962 +1,221 21 Apr – 1 Nov · 21 days played
17,71122,180peak 22,18021 Apr1 Nov
Faceit ELO: 914 +0 30 Aug – 1 Nov · 7 observations
914914peak 91430 Aug1 Nov
22,180Peak Premier in tracked matches
914Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-04-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 914
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 137 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 218 below peak (22,180)
  • +2,614 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,038 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-11-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,777), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate55.8%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.031.050.12 short
Match win rate37.3%45.2%45.7%8.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQuicksrFACEITLevel 6 · 914 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,962 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO914csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning63
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–40–2Last 10058%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility3.8
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.3
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time559ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 22 Sept →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 13 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · inferno, 15 Apr →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 79% over 19dust2Weakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3216–1650%0.02
infernoS1915–479%0.05
nukeA1710–759%0.04
dust2C146–843%0.03
ancientB84–450%0.03
cacheS64–267%0.05
anubis—21–150%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,402Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
1,119Matches
37.3%Match win rate
55.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,310MVPs
389Hours (in match)
325Bombs planted
250Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,479dust2
1,475inferno
1,343nuke
445train
117vertigo
27office
2ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches
51%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
97.9ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6436%1.2019.0
Dust23070%1.5621.0
Inferno2255%1.4619.9
Nuke1471%1.8526.1
Ancient1258%1.4220.7
Anubis838%1.6217.8
Cache729%1.4720.9
Overpass683%1.5520.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
550msReaction time
57.4%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
4.29HE damage / grenade
3.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4903 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.3392% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0320%29 Oct →
mirage13–80.0820%26 Oct →
ancient13–100.1115%26 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0619%24 Oct →
inferno16–140.0217%23 Oct →
nuke13–90.0318%19 Oct →
ancient7–3-0.0430%17 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0111%16 Oct →
mirage9–130.0219%16 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0326%14 Oct →
mirage13–50.0418%10 Oct →
mirage13–40.0916%9 Oct →
cache13–60.0616%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0915%7 Oct →
cache13–20.0319%23 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0614%22 Sept →
nuke13–30.0620%22 Sept →
inferno13–40.2234%22 Sept →
nuke5–130.0945%21 Sept →
mirage13–90.0925%18 Sept →
nuke13–110.1216%18 Sept →
mirage13–50.1623%18 Sept →
nuke13–100.0432%18 Sept →
inferno11–80.0429%18 Sept →
nuke13–100.0519%15 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0140%14 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0135%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0029%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.0442%13 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0414%13 Sept →
inferno13–50.1225%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.0646%13 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0614%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0317%5 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0716%30 Aug →
cache10–130.0133%30 Aug →
ancient11–130.0931%30 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0321%29 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0122%29 Aug →
cache13–60.0318%29 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0522%28 Aug →
cache11–130.0623%28 Aug →
ancient13–90.0136%28 Aug →
nuke14–160.0529%27 Aug →
mirage16–130.0417%26 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0127%26 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0844%26 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0222%25 Aug →
dust216–140.0615%25 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0221%25 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0142%25 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0218%25 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0026%25 Aug →
inferno11–130.0225%24 Aug →
dust28–130.0035%24 Aug →
nuke12–160.0024%3 Jun →
anubis13–100.0412%2 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0517%2 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0526%31 May →
overpass13–80.0319%31 May →
dust21–9-0.0643%31 May →
overpass12–60.0724%31 May →
nuke13–70.0225%29 May →
mirage16–130.0316%26 May →
mirage11–130.0522%29 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0212%26 Apr →
mirage16–120.0528%26 Apr →
inferno19–170.1220%26 Apr →
mirage12–16-0.0312%22 Apr →
mirage19–160.0120%22 Apr →
mirage13–40.0724%21 Apr →
inferno13–90.0122%21 Apr →
dust213–80.0223%21 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0213%20 Apr →
nuke19–170.0931%20 Apr →
inferno13–60.1322%19 Apr →
dust211–130.0423%18 Apr →
inferno1–5-0.0714%15 Apr →
nuke12–120.0229%15 Apr →
dust213–60.1217%15 Apr →
nuke4–130.0731%14 Apr →
dust213–110.1318%14 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0626%14 Apr →
ancient6–120.1614%13 Apr →
mirage9–130.0126%13 Apr →
mirage13–50.0416%13 Apr →
dust29–130.0927%13 Apr →
inferno13–20.1029%12 Apr →
mirage13–110.0235%12 Apr →
nuke13–70.1322%12 Apr →
mirage11–130.0721%11 Apr →
inferno13–90.0724%11 Apr →
dust28–130.1023%11 Apr →
inferno13–60.1230%11 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0313%11 Apr →
ancient1–90.0421%10 Apr →
nuke8–130.0315%10 Apr →
inferno13–80.1522%10 Apr →
inferno13–60.1214%9 Apr →
mirage8–130.0416%9 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.