𝑴𝑻𝑪 — CS2 Stats

76561199677598433[U:1:1717332705]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

911Tracked matches41%Win rate2024Tracked since

986Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#242943 of 261499 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,666 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	44.8%	46.8%	48.2%	3.4% short
Shot accuracy	0.0%	13.0%	13.2%	13.2% short
Kill/death ratio	1.49	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	50.6%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning76

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateWLLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.07
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

7–13 · 35% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.9

Utility5.0

Positioning7.6

Opening Duels7.0

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning7.6

Utility5.0

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels7.6

Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.06

Reaction time593ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms

Headshot accuracy22.1%+1.5%

first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 3 Oct →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–6 · dust2, 5 Oct →

391msFastest reaction time · 5–1 · inferno, 15 Jul →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 44% over 50dust2Weakest map · 42% over 43

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	50	22–28	44%	0.05
dust2	C	43	18–25	42%	0.06
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
ancient	—	2	2–0	100%	0.11
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 43). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,329Lifetime kills

1.49K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players

2,692Matches

50.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players

44.8%Headshot %

0.0%Shot accuracy

7,602MVPs

986Hours (in match)

2,042Bombs planted

816Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,950

M4A4 / M4A1-S13,495

AWP3,343

P2000 / USP-S2,920

Galil AR2,269

Glock-182,152

MP91,894

Desert Eagle1,320

MAC-101,035

Five-SeveN979

Lifetime map wins

10,556dust2

2,489inferno

780nuke

241train

230vertigo

5ar_shoots

1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches

54%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

77.7ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	27	67%	1.23	14.7
Dust2	21	38%	1.08	14.2
Inferno	11	73%	1.33	17.7
Nuke	5	40%	1.20	17.6
Ancient	3	33%	0.94	13.0
Train	1	0%	1.20	18.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.17	14.0
Anubis	1	0%	1.00	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

42.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.3%Spray accuracy

84.3%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

592msReaction time

60.9%T opening success

60.2%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

10.0%Flash assists

6.50HE damage / grenade

5.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 43 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–10	0.15	12%	5 Oct →
cache	8–13	0.04	19%	5 Oct →
dust2	1–6	-0.07	50%	5 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	27%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.24	21%	3 Oct →
mirage	2–13	-0.00	13%	3 Oct →
mirage	1–6	0.03	25%	21 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.08	22%	21 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.09	19%	15 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.05	29%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.06	11%	14 Sept →
dust2	3–13	0.01	11%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.11	33%	13 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.07	18%	13 Sept →
dust2	1–13	-0.02	12%	13 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.06	26%	13 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.08	23%	13 Sept →
mirage	2–11	-0.02	22%	13 Sept →
mirage	1–5	-0.09	40%	9 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.08	33%	7 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.05	8%	5 Sept →
mirage	12–12	-0.06	13%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.10	13%	31 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.18	29%	31 Aug →
dust2	2–5	0.17	32%	26 Aug →
mirage	0–5	-0.07	9%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.07	33%	23 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	18%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.13	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.22	29%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	31%	17 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.07	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.06	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	2–8	0.03	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.07	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	13%	11 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.14	17%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	22%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	11%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	29%	26 Jul →
mirage	6–4	0.08	17%	26 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	23%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.02	31%	26 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.04	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	16%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.08	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.01	19%	23 Jul →
dust2	0–10	-0.07	11%	23 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.09	34%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.00	16%	22 Jul →
mirage	1–6	0.06	47%	22 Jul →
mirage	1–2	0.01	10%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	12%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	11%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	22%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–0	0.00	11%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.08	25%	19 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	20%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.12	13%	16 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.06	19%	15 Jul →
inferno	5–1	0.02	11%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	18%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.10	8%	15 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.04	17%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	28%	15 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.00	26%	15 Jul →
anubis	4–13	0.03	15%	15 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	11%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	40%	13 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.02	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.01	8%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.13	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.12	14%	12 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	26%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	12%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.17	25%	12 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.09	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.09	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.08	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.10	21%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.15	38%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.13	15%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.11	26%	9 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.05	32%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.11	21%	8 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.04	16%	6 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.09	39%	5 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.08	27%	5 Jul →
ancient	9–2	0.16	27%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	19%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.08	25%	3 Jul →