INS|Sn1pe_y

INS|Sn1pe_y — CS2 Stats

76561199659114886[U:1:1698849158]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

685Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
527Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating3,080Grey band · top ~86.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 910 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 30 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,080 -474 30 Jul18 Sept · 16 days played
2,3213,554peak 3,55430 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 910 +0 10 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
910910peak 91010 Sept18 Sept
3,653Peak Premier in tracked matches
910Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-07-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 910
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 141 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 474 below peak (3,554)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 1,920 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2218+4
Win rate59%39%+20pp
K/D0.870.76+0.10
Headshot %45%53%−7pp

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate49.6%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.2%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.720.991.020.30 short
Match win rate34.9%43.9%44.7%9.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGINS|Sn1pe_yFACEITLevel 4 · 910 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER3,080 · Grey bandPEAK ELO910csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning44
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateLWLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time618ms−122ms
first ⅓ avg 740ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 1 Aug
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 3 Aug
414msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 5 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
72In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32122038%-0.01
dust2S1510567%-0.01
infernoS1510567%-0.05
nukeC94544%0.04
anubisD93633%-0.01
ancientD82625%0.00
cacheD72529%-0.03
overpass220100%-0.06
vertigo2020%-0.09
train1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,502Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
1,419Matches
34.9%Match win rate
49.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,018MVPs
527Hours (in match)
823Bombs planted
223Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,664inferno
1,573dust2
1,497nuke
731vertigo
202train
30office
27italy
27ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
45%Win rate
0.68Avg K/D
56.2ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1338%0.7511.2
Dust2617%0.385.7
Ancient450%0.6610.0
Inferno4100%0.8812.5
Anubis450%0.628.3
Nuke1100%1.5819.0
Cache10%0.152.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
618msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
6.75HE damage / grenade
10.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4965 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.415% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0410%17 Sept
mirage13–90.0217%17 Sept
mirage8–130.0114%17 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0418%17 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0717%16 Sept
nuke13–80.1414%16 Sept
nuke13–50.0115%16 Sept
anubis13–70.0820%16 Sept
dust26–13-0.0915%16 Sept
mirage7–130.1115%16 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0316%15 Sept
dust213–110.0323%15 Sept
anubis13–110.0213%15 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0513%15 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0211%14 Sept
dust213–7-0.019%14 Sept
dust213–6-0.0216%14 Sept
dust213–50.0922%14 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0124%14 Sept
inferno13–40.0315%14 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0327%14 Sept
dust213–40.0229%11 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0815%10 Sept
overpass13–9-0.0531%10 Sept
mirage16–19-0.0220%7 Sept
cache0–13-0.068%7 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0214%6 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0028%5 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0116%5 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0419%5 Sept
cache13–60.0223%5 Sept
ancient8–130.0719%5 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0124%4 Sept
mirage13–70.0135%4 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0629%3 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0115%3 Sept
anubis3–13-0.1210%3 Sept
cache13–11-0.0222%2 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0722%2 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0827%2 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0313%2 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0510%2 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0825%2 Sept
mirage9–13-0.094%2 Sept
dust29–130.0422%2 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0013%1 Sept
cache12–12-0.0236%1 Sept
mirage13–50.0618%1 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0319%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.1018%31 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0215%31 Aug
nuke13–40.0413%31 Aug
ancient14–16-0.076%31 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0021%31 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0421%31 Aug
cache7–13-0.115%31 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0717%31 Aug
dust24–4-0.050%31 Aug
mirage10–13-0.028%31 Aug
vertigo4–9-0.1416%30 Aug
inferno9–130.0913%29 Aug
ancient13–30.0122%29 Aug
cache12–12-0.0614%29 Aug
dust24–13-0.0611%29 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1617%29 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0223%29 Aug
anubis5–100.0515%29 Aug
mirage10–130.0216%29 Aug
mirage13–30.0614%29 Aug
ancient13–30.1021%29 Aug
nuke11–130.1320%29 Aug
cache5–130.0328%28 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1722%28 Aug
inferno9–50.0716%28 Aug
inferno6–9-0.2533%9 Aug
mirage7–130.0024%5 Aug
ancient3–90.0017%5 Aug
anubis13–30.0621%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0615%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0124%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0626%3 Aug
dust213–2-0.0141%3 Aug
train7–13-0.0718%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.1021%2 Aug
inferno9–6-0.0818%2 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0430%2 Aug
overpass13–10-0.088%1 Aug
nuke10–130.0419%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0218%1 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0829%1 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0217%1 Aug
nuke13–50.1118%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.140%1 Aug
mirage13–20.1725%1 Aug
dust216–14-0.0017%1 Aug
anubis4–130.0224%1 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0513%30 Jul
dust213–6-0.0039%30 Jul
dust213–60.0521%30 Jul
mirage13–20.0232%30 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →