svex | CSFIT

svex | CSFIT — CS2 Stats

IL76561199589689781[U:1:1629424053]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

294Tracked matches40%Win rate2026Tracked since
352Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating19,363Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90039 of 247915 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,363 -187 26 Aug – 1 Oct · 26 days played
19,30522,172peak 22,17226 Aug1 Oct
22,277Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,140Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,809 below peak (22,172)
  • -2,288 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 637 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches134——
Win rate34%——
K/D0.73——
Headshot %58%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,989), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate52.3%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.3%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.650.991.020.36 short
Match win rate30.7%43.9%44.7%14.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsvex | CSFITFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,363 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,140csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning56
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLWLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility3.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch6.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.6
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time596ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 24 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 26 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 10 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 18nukeWeakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1811–761%-0.01
nukeD163–1319%0.01
cacheA148–657%0.00
dust2C135–838%-0.01
anubisB115–645%0.01
ancientB115–645%0.02
infernoB63–350%0.01
overpass—43–175%0.02
vertigo—33–0100%0.02
train—21–150%-0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.08
office—10–10%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,737Lifetime kills
0.65K/D
704Matches
30.7%Match win rate
52.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
945MVPs
352Hours (in match)
379Bombs planted
71Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

921dust2
545nuke
328inferno
92vertigo
82train
18office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

30Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
91.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis786%1.3215.6
Ancient743%1.2220.4
Mirage560%1.2222.4
Inferno30%1.0515.0
Dust2367%1.5317.3
Nuke250%0.9316.5
Cache20%0.589.5
Vertigo1100%1.8027.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
593msReaction time
46.6%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
6.87HE damage / grenade
4.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass6–130.0327%1 Oct →
cache13–110.0125%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0548%1 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.099%1 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0110%30 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0820%29 Sept →
overpass13–30.0111%29 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0420%29 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0432%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0517%28 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0417%28 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0316%28 Sept →
ancient11–130.1024%26 Sept →
mirage22–20-0.0016%25 Sept →
ancient10–130.0415%25 Sept →
dust213–60.1425%24 Sept →
anubis13–100.009%23 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0416%23 Sept →
ancient8–130.0613%23 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0520%23 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0419%22 Sept →
train13–80.0417%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.0419%20 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.027%20 Sept →
nuke3–100.1118%20 Sept →
dust22–130.0010%20 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0019%19 Sept →
overpass13–50.0217%19 Sept →
overpass13–30.0110%19 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0318%19 Sept →
anubis13–100.049%19 Sept →
mirage13–60.0119%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.0321%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0020%18 Sept →
ancient13–60.0124%18 Sept →
dust213–00.0323%18 Sept →
train12–12-0.0928%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.0016%17 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0116%16 Sept →
inferno9–40.1020%16 Sept →
anubis9–130.0322%16 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0413%16 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0616%16 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0119%16 Sept →
cache13–30.0518%15 Sept →
dust23–13-0.097%15 Sept →
nuke11–130.0535%15 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0314%15 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0925%14 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0419%11 Sept →
nuke10–130.0114%10 Sept →
inferno13–50.0115%10 Sept →
ancient9–130.0918%10 Sept →
ancient5–130.0219%9 Sept →
mirage13–60.0717%9 Sept →
cache4–10.0824%9 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0316%9 Sept →
anubis13–100.0417%9 Sept →
nuke16–130.0414%9 Sept →
inferno9–130.0519%9 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0219%8 Sept →
dust25–130.0114%8 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0418%8 Sept →
anubis8–130.0314%8 Sept →
nuke10–130.0416%7 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.077%7 Sept →
anubis13–60.0922%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.0417%6 Sept →
vertigo9–40.0420%3 Sept →
vertigo9–20.1128%3 Sept →
vertigo9–4-0.089%3 Sept →
poseidon7–9-0.0820%3 Sept →
cache10–30.0424%3 Sept →
anubis5–130.0113%3 Sept →
dust210–130.0116%3 Sept →
office12–120.0924%2 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0514%2 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.069%2 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0113%1 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0523%1 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0114%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0419%31 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0511%30 Aug →
cache10–6-0.0417%30 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0032%30 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0131%30 Aug →
nuke8–130.0122%29 Aug →
cache10–130.0624%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0721%29 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0217%28 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0130%28 Aug →
mirage13–90.0113%28 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0516%27 Aug →
dust27–0-0.0420%27 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0218%27 Aug →
mirage10–0-0.0230%27 Aug →
mirage13–00.000%26 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.020%26 Aug →
dust213–3-0.019%26 Aug →
dust213–2-0.00100%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.