venex2K

venex2K — CS2 Stats

JP76561199570816021[U:1:1610550293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,781Tracked matches56%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,639Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,015Top 25% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32987 of 261661 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,820 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,015 -816 7 Aug – 12 Nov · 23 days played
23,05225,109peak 25,1097 Aug12 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,820 +0 1 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
1,8201,820peak 1,8201 Sept23 Sept
25,109Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,820Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,820
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 181 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,094 below peak (25,109)
  • +687 over 30 days · improving
  • -928 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 985 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,553), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate65.2%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.2%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.341.071.09above
Match win rate49.9%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvenex2KFACEITLevel 9 · 1,820 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,015 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,820csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning62
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateLWWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · −76ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.2
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.2
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.9

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time570ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · cache, 17 Sept →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 12 Nov →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · cache, 21 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2711–1641%0.01
mirageC207–1335%0.01
ancientC167–944%-0.00
infernoD124–833%-0.00
anubisA85–363%0.00
cacheB63–350%0.02
nuke—33–0100%0.04
train—32–167%0.06
office—21–150%0.04
rush_001—11–0100%0.06
vertigo—10–10%-0.04
fachwerk—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,304Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
2,556Matches
49.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
65.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
6,628MVPs
1,395Hours (in match)
3,379Bombs planted
824Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,479dust2
1,941inferno
1,939nuke
572train
266vertigo
90office
35italy
8bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

545Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
80.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16748%1.1216.2
Dust214559%1.2617.0
Ancient8748%1.1014.9
Inferno4641%0.9513.5
Anubis3773%1.2316.9
Nuke2250%1.0214.9
Train2148%1.2918.1
Cache1145%1.1916.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.0%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
566msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
10.99HE damage / grenade
9.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.122% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0353%12 Nov →
dust216–12-0.0234%12 Nov →
mirage13–90.0629%12 Nov →
cache13–5-0.0330%12 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0217%9 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0817%9 Nov →
anubis13–40.0336%9 Nov →
office2–130.0141%3 Nov →
cache13–80.1144%3 Nov →
dust29–130.0345%3 Nov →
inferno9–130.0731%3 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0130%1 Nov →
inferno3–13-0.0532%1 Nov →
ancient13–40.0428%1 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0235%29 Oct →
dust214–160.0022%22 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0230%22 Oct →
anubis13–80.0325%22 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0141%22 Oct →
nuke13–100.0725%20 Oct →
dust212–120.1022%20 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0120%19 Oct →
train13–11-0.0036%15 Oct →
dust212–120.0319%15 Oct →
inferno7–130.0133%13 Oct →
dust213–110.0722%12 Oct →
mirage12–120.0828%10 Oct →
dust213–100.0623%9 Oct →
dust213–3-0.1121%9 Oct →
rush_0018–60.0621%8 Oct →
office13–90.0733%6 Oct →
dust24–130.0022%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0425%4 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0220%3 Oct →
inferno0–5-0.070%3 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0419%30 Sept →
dust213–60.0627%24 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0426%24 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0217%20 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0323%20 Sept →
cache13–70.1429%17 Sept →
mirage8–130.0118%17 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0025%12 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0029%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.0219%11 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0218%11 Sept →
dust213–100.0330%11 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0138%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.0331%9 Sept →
ancient11–130.0325%6 Sept →
anubis16–130.0326%5 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0340%4 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0118%4 Sept →
ancient13–20.0629%31 Aug →
train12–120.0625%25 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0729%24 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0816%24 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0118%24 Aug →
fachwerk9–130.0525%24 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0426%23 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0413%21 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0142%21 Aug →
mirage13–20.034%20 Aug →
anubis13–60.0127%20 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0535%20 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0113%19 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0717%19 Aug →
dust28–130.0746%17 Aug →
dust210–130.0417%15 Aug →
mirage16–120.0228%14 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0330%14 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0223%14 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0430%14 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0035%14 Aug →
nuke13–100.0523%14 Aug →
mirage15–150.0520%12 Aug →
ancient13–60.0426%12 Aug →
train13–90.1328%12 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0628%11 Aug →
ancient11–130.0126%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0635%11 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0314%10 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0211%10 Aug →
ancient13–80.0730%9 Aug →
mirage16–19-0.0519%9 Aug →
inferno13–50.0328%9 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0632%9 Aug →
dust213–40.1320%8 Aug →
mirage8–130.0213%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0021%8 Aug →
mirage16–140.0525%8 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0229%8 Aug →
inferno13–90.0530%7 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0133%7 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0032%7 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0019%7 Aug →
dust213–90.0627%6 Aug →
dust27–130.0333%6 Aug →
mirage16–190.0324%6 Aug →
inferno11–130.0437%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.