Eine dickbrüstige Frau

Eine dickbrüstige Frau — CS2 Stats

76561199549664079[U:1:1589398351]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

518Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since
511Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating11,398Blue band · top ~47.5% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,398 +3,843 10 Jun – 30 Sept · 29 days played
5,58911,398peak 11,39810 Jun30 Sept
11,465Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-06-10

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 11,398
  • +1,399 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,809 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,602 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate38.7%42.0%44.3%5.6% short
Shot accuracy0.2%9.6%11.9%11.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.780.981.030.26 short
Match win rate47.8%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEine dickbrüstige FrauPREMIER11,398 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning49
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateWLWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim3.6
Utility4.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning4.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time596ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–1 · debris, 17 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · anubis, 17 Jul →
344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · office, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2513–1252%-0.03
dust2C239–1439%-0.04
ancientB115–645%-0.01
infernoC73–443%-0.01
nukeS75–271%-0.03
cacheB63–350%-0.04
anubisD51–420%-0.06
officeD51–420%-0.01
poseidon—42–250%0.01
boulder—10–10%0.02
shelter—11–0100%-0.02
eldorado—10–10%-0.26
debris—11–0100%0.17
train—10–10%-0.08
sanctum—10–10%0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,788Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
999Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Blue band
38.7%Headshot %
0.2%Shot accuracy
1,619MVPs
511Hours (in match)
1,326Bombs planted
237Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,257dust2
1,017nuke
985inferno
311train
136vertigo
101office
14italy
3cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.6%Spray accuracy
63.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
587msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
5.75HE damage / grenade
7.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7377% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4442 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7713% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0713%30 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0514%28 Sept →
mirage13–30.0021%28 Sept →
ancient13–50.019%28 Sept →
inferno7–20.0113%26 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0410%25 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0517%23 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.054%23 Sept →
cache13–10-0.058%16 Sept →
ancient13–10.0626%16 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0411%14 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0421%7 Sept →
cache13–80.0419%5 Sept →
office4–13-0.074%5 Sept →
ancient12–120.0112%4 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0312%28 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0316%19 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0721%19 Aug →
office13–110.0724%18 Aug →
mirage5–130.0224%8 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.087%6 Aug →
office3–13-0.044%6 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.034%5 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0112%1 Aug →
cache6–13-0.087%29 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0212%29 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0724%29 Jul →
ancient13–100.057%27 Jul →
nuke13–30.0118%21 Jul →
boulder8–130.0223%21 Jul →
shelter13–10-0.026%21 Jul →
dust213–10.0013%21 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.013%21 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0622%20 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.029%20 Jul →
dust211–13-0.059%20 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0421%19 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.090%19 Jul →
dust211–13-0.069%19 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0830%19 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0513%19 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.0317%19 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0218%18 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.058%18 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0211%18 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0019%18 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0833%17 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0513%17 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.048%17 Jul →
eldorado0–9-0.260%17 Jul →
debris9–10.1729%17 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0513%16 Jul →
dust212–160.002%15 Jul →
nuke13–1-0.0117%15 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0112%9 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0110%9 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.017%9 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0530%9 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0110%8 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0324%8 Jul →
office7–130.0313%8 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0314%7 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0612%7 Jul →
poseidon9–50.0427%6 Jul →
office10–13-0.0314%6 Jul →
dust23–13-0.040%1 Jul →
mirage13–70.017%1 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.056%1 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.024%30 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0118%30 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.049%30 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.055%29 Jun →
mirage13–110.0219%29 Jun →
train10–13-0.0810%23 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.038%23 Jun →
nuke13–6-0.068%23 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0211%22 Jun →
ancient2–8-0.004%22 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0515%22 Jun →
poseidon9–40.0927%22 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0016%21 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0311%18 Jun →
poseidon7–9-0.0114%18 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.085%18 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0112%18 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.099%18 Jun →
inferno13–110.0915%17 Jun →
mirage13–40.0916%17 Jun →
dust213–3-0.0323%17 Jun →
sanctum8–80.0211%17 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0616%16 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.1010%16 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0418%15 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0526%11 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0214%10 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0614%10 Jun →
dust29–130.0417%10 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0313%10 Jun →
ancient13–50.015%10 Jun →
poseidon6–9-0.088%10 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.