John Binding

John Binding — CS2 Stats

76561198110037873[U:1:149772145]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,936Tracked matches42%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating9,897Light Blue band · top ~55.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 7 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,897 -4,086 7 Aug20 Sept · 20 days played
9,89714,251peak 14,2517 Aug20 Sept
14,608Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,354 below peak (14,251)
  • -1,750 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 103 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJohn BindingPREMIER9,897 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning47
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY424810Last 10042%Win rateLLWWWTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · +129ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 708ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 704ms

Last 20

  • 794 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility5.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.4

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time623ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 21 Aug
55%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · inferno, 16 Sept
430msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 30 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27111641%-0.02
infernoC1881044%-0.03
nukeB147750%-0.00
mirageD91811%-0.03
officeA85363%-0.00
ancientC73443%-0.00
cacheB63350%-0.02
train31233%-0.04
vertigo2020%-0.05
anubis2020%-0.02
debris110100%-0.08
overpass1010%-0.08
fachwerk110100%0.05
boulder110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
25%Win rate
0.58Avg K/D
46.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20%0.457.0
Vertigo10%0.4811.0
Nuke1100%0.9313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
64.6%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
601msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
14.1%Flash assists
9.63HE damage / grenade
6.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7066% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office5–13-0.0119%17 Sept
cache4–13-0.0729%17 Sept
dust213–80.0511%16 Sept
nuke13–80.0416%16 Sept
cache13–100.0415%16 Sept
inferno8–8-0.1455%16 Sept
dust23–13-0.029%14 Sept
office13–4-0.0114%14 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1510%14 Sept
debris9–4-0.0816%14 Sept
dust27–13-0.0512%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0519%11 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0213%11 Sept
nuke13–10.0420%11 Sept
dust212–120.0224%11 Sept
inferno13–70.0514%10 Sept
train12–12-0.049%9 Sept
nuke6–13-0.1012%9 Sept
overpass12–12-0.089%9 Sept
dust29–13-0.0317%7 Sept
inferno11–130.0211%7 Sept
cache13–80.0313%5 Sept
office4–130.1113%5 Sept
inferno2–9-0.1715%3 Sept
office13–6-0.0519%3 Sept
dust216–14-0.028%1 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0114%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.0320%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0111%31 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0418%31 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0416%31 Aug
dust26–13-0.0611%31 Aug
fachwerk13–30.0518%31 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0426%30 Aug
boulder13–3-0.0220%30 Aug
train13–10-0.0518%30 Aug
inferno3–13-0.064%30 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0615%30 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0412%30 Aug
nuke13–110.0620%30 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0210%30 Aug
dust210–5-0.035%30 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0514%29 Aug
ancient13–5-0.036%29 Aug
inferno13–30.038%29 Aug
cache13–8-0.0116%29 Aug
nuke13–100.1114%24 Aug
mirage10–130.048%24 Aug
dust21–13-0.0814%24 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0314%24 Aug
dust213–80.0112%24 Aug
nuke14–160.0115%24 Aug
dust213–70.0113%24 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0020%23 Aug
dust213–50.0814%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0417%22 Aug
inferno7–130.039%21 Aug
inferno13–100.119%21 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0611%21 Aug
dust20–13-0.080%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.039%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0418%19 Aug
office13–110.0123%18 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0321%18 Aug
mirage1–13-0.055%14 Aug
dust213–50.0015%14 Aug
cache8–13-0.0418%14 Aug
cache11–13-0.0620%13 Aug
ancient13–100.028%13 Aug
dust213–40.0413%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0213%12 Aug
train12–12-0.0515%12 Aug
dust211–13-0.0315%12 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0310%12 Aug
inferno13–80.0119%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.053%12 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0615%11 Aug
nuke8–13-0.039%11 Aug
office13–8-0.0125%11 Aug
office13–10-0.0111%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.059%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0212%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.037%10 Aug
ancient13–110.017%10 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0626%10 Aug
nuke13–100.089%10 Aug
dust213–60.018%10 Aug
inferno6–130.0120%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0512%10 Aug
dust215–15-0.047%10 Aug
nuke13–10-0.047%9 Aug
dust213–6-0.0214%9 Aug
inferno13–8-0.066%9 Aug
office5–13-0.068%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.019%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0711%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0312%7 Aug
ancient15–150.0213%7 Aug
dust213–50.1012%7 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0012%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →