juhana tegelberg

juhana tegelberg — CS2 Stats

76561199544132077[U:1:1583866349]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,171Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,170Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,093Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82395 of 260001 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,545 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,093 -2,260 1 Sept – 4 Nov · 21 days played
17,56322,353peak 22,3531 Sept4 Nov
22,487Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,545Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,545
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 206 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,260 below peak (22,353)
  • +1,380 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,907 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate48.8%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.3%12.7%13.0%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.821.051.060.24 short
Match win rate44.7%45.7%46.3%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjuhana tegelbergFACEITLevel 7 · 1,545 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,093 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,545csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning59
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–53–7Last 10040%Win rateLLLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility2.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.9
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time575ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 4–0 · ancient, 30 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 1–5 · mirage, 30 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 10mirageWeakest map · 11% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2513–1252%-0.01
mirageD182–1611%-0.01
dust2C166–1038%-0.02
ancientC114–736%0.00
cacheA106–460%-0.01
infernoC83–538%0.00
anubisA53–260%-0.01
train—21–150%0.01
vertigo—22–0100%0.05
office—10–10%-0.04
poseidon—10–10%-0.03
overpass—10–10%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,852Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
5,336Matches
44.7%Match win rate
48.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
0.3%Shot accuracy
11,396MVPs
2,131Hours (in match)
2,473Bombs planted
1,145Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,724
AWP4,471
MP92,770
MAC-102,611
XM10141,432

Lifetime map wins

8,283nuke
8,093inferno
6,121dust2
4,243vertigo
925train
179office
46italy
5ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

617Matches
51%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
74.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14350%0.9414.4
Ancient11044%0.8814.1
Dust210144%0.9515.0
Nuke9054%0.8713.6
Inferno8170%1.1915.9
Anubis5242%0.8914.9
Train1471%1.0816.4
Vertigo1040%0.7112.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
580msReaction time
56.6%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
4.76HE damage / grenade
2.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.348 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0921%4 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0222%4 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0621%4 Nov →
anubis13–10-0.0216%4 Nov →
anubis5–13-0.059%4 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0827%3 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0714%3 Nov →
nuke13–80.0112%3 Nov →
nuke13–80.0516%3 Nov →
mirage13–50.0920%3 Nov →
cache13–30.0829%3 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0024%30 Oct →
dust27–2-0.085%30 Oct →
ancient4–00.0920%30 Oct →
anubis7–130.0120%29 Oct →
train10–13-0.0426%28 Oct →
nuke7–30.0532%28 Oct →
dust213–110.0233%27 Oct →
dust213–100.0012%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0636%26 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0213%26 Oct →
cache13–80.0126%26 Oct →
nuke8–80.0639%26 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0515%24 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.039%24 Oct →
cache13–60.0129%24 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0024%23 Oct →
nuke13–60.0131%23 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0222%21 Oct →
cache13–40.0323%21 Oct →
nuke13–20.0827%21 Oct →
nuke13–00.0627%21 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0320%21 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0517%21 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0316%21 Oct →
office4–12-0.0413%19 Oct →
mirage10–130.0118%19 Oct →
ancient8–130.0217%19 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0126%19 Oct →
nuke9–6-0.0725%17 Oct →
dust213–60.0824%16 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0427%15 Oct →
nuke8–130.0021%15 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0120%14 Oct →
mirage13–50.0811%14 Oct →
inferno13–30.0517%14 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0027%14 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0818%8 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0120%8 Oct →
nuke11–130.0221%8 Oct →
mirage11–130.0328%8 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0310%8 Oct →
cache12–16-0.0517%8 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0913%8 Oct →
inferno13–50.0128%8 Oct →
vertigo9–70.0341%7 Oct →
train13–40.0721%7 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0133%7 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0738%6 Oct →
dust210–130.0024%6 Oct →
inferno2–0-0.000%6 Oct →
nuke9–70.0518%6 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0619%4 Oct →
inferno7–120.0422%4 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0315%4 Oct →
nuke13–90.0225%3 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0415%3 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.136%2 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0717%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0117%2 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0010%1 Oct →
anubis13–30.0516%1 Oct →
nuke6–130.0124%1 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0042%1 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0934%1 Oct →
dust28–13-0.078%30 Sept →
ancient13–100.0417%30 Sept →
ancient13–30.0420%30 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.048%30 Sept →
mirage1–50.0744%30 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0427%30 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0116%29 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0916%29 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0219%29 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0112%29 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0117%29 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0414%28 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0033%28 Sept →
poseidon8–8-0.0324%28 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0617%28 Sept →
inferno8–80.026%27 Sept →
overpass7–9-0.1326%27 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0829%25 Sept →
ancient9–130.0218%25 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0027%24 Sept →
vertigo13–60.0723%24 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0624%24 Sept →
mirage15–150.0320%24 Sept →
nuke13–80.0211%24 Sept →
dust24–130.0127%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.