galaxen

galaxen — CS2 Stats

VA76561199537877074[U:1:1577611346]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,066Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,737Hours in CS120Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,282Purple band · top ~23.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 937 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,282 +275 30 Aug – 28 Oct · 12 days played
15,78218,005peak 18,00530 Aug28 Oct
Faceit ELO: 937 +0 30 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
937937peak 93730 Aug1 Sept
18,793Peak Premier in tracked matches
937Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
10Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 937
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 114 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,723 below peak (18,005)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,718 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches249108+141
Win rate44%53%−9pp
K/D0.940.96−0.02
Headshot %34%30%+4pp

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 29 Oct 2026; previous 30 Aug 2026 → 25 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate32.5%43.8%44.8%12.3% short
Shot accuracy0.2%12.0%12.4%12.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.021.030.05 short
Match win rate47.3%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgalaxenFACEITLevel 5 · 937 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,282 · Purple bandPEAK ELO937csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning63
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLWWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility4.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning6.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time542ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 19 Oct →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 21 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 27 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 81% over 16dust2Weakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D195–1426%-0.02
ancientS1613–381%0.00
mirageD165–1131%-0.01
infernoC156–940%-0.01
cacheD134–931%-0.01
anubisS129–375%-0.01
nukeA95–456%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,454Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
5,912Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
32.5%Headshot %
0.2%Shot accuracy
9,900MVPs
2,291Hours (in match)
6,420Bombs planted
1,199Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,787
MP75,472
AWP4,310
MAC-103,818
Tec-91,914
HE Grenade1,669

Lifetime map wins

9,630nuke
9,122inferno
4,706dust2
3,331vertigo
1,012train
113office
44italy
9cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches
52%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
73.4ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2370%0.9613.7
Nuke2241%0.9214.8
Inferno1362%0.9514.2
Dust21267%1.0513.2
Mirage1136%0.6510.6
Anubis933%1.0916.4
Overpass450%0.6810.5
Vertigo450%0.8614.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.5%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
551msReaction time
50.8%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
12.07HE damage / grenade
2.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.5106% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9398 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke14–160.0414%28 Oct →
cache13–40.087%28 Oct →
dust213–90.0213%28 Oct →
ancient13–90.0320%28 Oct →
cache10–13-0.048%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0110%28 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.045%28 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.016%28 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0714%28 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0413%28 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0216%28 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.078%28 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0110%28 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.033%27 Oct →
dust213–80.0110%27 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.008%27 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0610%27 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0212%27 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0614%27 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0113%27 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0310%27 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.110%27 Oct →
mirage8–130.0119%27 Oct →
dust213–00.0311%27 Oct →
mirage13–100.0216%27 Oct →
anubis13–90.016%27 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0118%26 Oct →
inferno13–110.0714%26 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0415%26 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0514%26 Oct →
cache7–0-0.050%26 Oct →
inferno13–30.0711%26 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0718%26 Oct →
nuke8–130.048%26 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0414%26 Oct →
ancient13–60.0310%26 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0211%26 Oct →
ancient8–130.0213%26 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0412%25 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0016%25 Oct →
anubis13–20.067%25 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0014%25 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.044%25 Oct →
cache5–130.058%25 Oct →
inferno15–150.014%25 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.039%25 Oct →
dust213–10-0.047%25 Oct →
ancient16–140.0513%25 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0312%25 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0910%25 Oct →
ancient13–80.0112%25 Oct →
ancient13–60.0019%25 Oct →
ancient13–60.008%25 Oct →
mirage13–100.0613%24 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.058%24 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0010%24 Oct →
mirage13–110.0010%24 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.027%24 Oct →
nuke13–50.108%24 Oct →
mirage9–130.026%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0120%24 Oct →
inferno10–130.0113%24 Oct →
cache13–90.035%24 Oct →
ancient13–50.0213%24 Oct →
nuke13–90.0610%23 Oct →
ancient13–80.0616%23 Oct →
mirage13–80.0311%23 Oct →
anubis13–80.0110%23 Oct →
anubis13–70.0311%23 Oct →
dust29–130.0013%23 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.043%23 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0419%22 Oct →
ancient13–110.0414%22 Oct →
cache9–130.0111%22 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0620%22 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0415%22 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.1210%22 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.018%22 Oct →
ancient13–40.0810%22 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0117%21 Oct →
dust29–130.0214%21 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0214%21 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0517%21 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0014%21 Oct →
mirage15–150.017%21 Oct →
cache13–80.0015%21 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0529%21 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0926%21 Oct →
inferno15–150.0514%21 Oct →
cache9–13-0.017%20 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.079%20 Oct →
anubis13–60.0414%20 Oct →
nuke8–130.009%20 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0215%20 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0316%20 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0111%19 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0214%19 Oct →
nuke13–50.108%19 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0711%19 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0113%19 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.