Westlemons- Static Tracker

Westlemons- Static Tracker — CS2 Stats

76561199524994306[U:1:1564728578]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,369Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
826Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+42Tracked matches · now 1,369
−2.8ppWin rate · 56.7% → 53.8%

Rating over time

38Days played since 2026-07-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches81——
Win rate53%——
K/D0.80——
Headshot %52%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,636), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate52.8%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.021.030.17 short
Match win rate47.7%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWestlemons- Static TrackerFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning44
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.5pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility3.9
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact6.3

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time579ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.05Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 22 Sept →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 26 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · nuke, 13 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 25 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
14–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC156–940%-0.03
mirageC146–843%-0.03
ancientA138–562%-0.02
infernoB136–746%-0.08
cacheA74–357%-0.05
trainA74–357%-0.04
dust2S64–267%-0.03
nuke—43–175%-0.08
boulder—41–325%-0.05
overpass—32–167%-0.04
poseidon—31–233%-0.03
eldorado—32–167%-0.01
rush_001—22–0100%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%-0.02
fachwerk—21–150%-0.04
debris—21–150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,493Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
1,461Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
52.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,477MVPs
522Hours (in match)
1,031Bombs planted
309Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,017nuke
1,828inferno
1,167dust2
820vertigo
774train
104office
30italy
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

89Matches
56%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
62.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2250%0.7312.0
Mirage1850%0.8112.6
Ancient1669%0.7912.3
Inferno1250%0.588.8
Cache956%0.6810.6
Dust2862%0.6011.1
Nuke3100%0.8113.3
Vertigo10%0.397.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
574msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
5.17HE damage / grenade
8.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3631 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4796% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–16-0.0315%1 Oct →
rush_0018–40.0218%30 Sept →
anubis13–90.0314%30 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0212%30 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0318%30 Sept →
rush_0015–1-0.0317%28 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0815%24 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0116%24 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0119%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.079%23 Sept →
nuke13–100.0524%22 Sept →
dust29–130.0129%21 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0210%21 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0426%21 Sept →
overpass3–2-0.0620%21 Sept →
dust22–130.027%21 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0216%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0522%19 Sept →
train12–120.0129%19 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0122%18 Sept →
fachwerk12–12-0.0514%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0924%17 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0624%17 Sept →
dust219–17-0.0622%14 Sept →
boulder13–4-0.0220%14 Sept →
boulder12–12-0.0220%10 Sept →
anubis9–130.0115%10 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0516%10 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.1525%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.1022%9 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0416%9 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0915%8 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0719%5 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0119%5 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.1010%5 Sept →
overpass8–8-0.0617%3 Sept →
inferno9–2-0.1127%3 Sept →
nuke9–6-0.0424%3 Sept →
poseidon9–50.0528%3 Sept →
cache1–6-0.090%3 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0519%1 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0523%1 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0511%27 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0414%27 Aug →
ancient13–30.0114%27 Aug →
inferno1–2-0.130%27 Aug →
overpass13–7-0.0130%26 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0656%26 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0233%25 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0510%25 Aug →
train13–10-0.0422%25 Aug →
ancient13–0-0.0413%25 Aug →
train5–13-0.0423%24 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0321%23 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0417%23 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0417%23 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0213%22 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0413%22 Aug →
ancient13–110.0220%22 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0521%21 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0315%21 Aug →
ancient13–80.0223%21 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0413%19 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0914%19 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1436%19 Aug →
train3–13-0.0921%17 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0514%17 Aug →
mirage5–130.0215%17 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0724%14 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0127%14 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0418%14 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0921%14 Aug →
debris9–6-0.0721%13 Aug →
poseidon7–9-0.0035%13 Aug →
eldorado9–40.0323%13 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.120%13 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.2719%13 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0117%12 Aug →
cache13–40.0328%12 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.110%12 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.035%12 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0813%12 Aug →
mirage16–140.0223%10 Aug →
mirage13–20.0320%9 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.069%9 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.138%9 Aug →
eldorado9–50.0114%6 Aug →
debris8–80.0015%6 Aug →
eldorado6–9-0.076%6 Aug →
train13–3-0.0813%5 Aug →
boulder10–13-0.0818%4 Aug →
boulder9–13-0.0514%3 Aug →
train13–70.0219%3 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0323%3 Aug →
fachwerk13–9-0.0333%2 Aug →
anubis13–110.0125%2 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0124%2 Aug →
train13–9-0.0726%1 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0314%1 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0419%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.