Richer than you — CS2 Stats

76561199050823418[U:1:1090557690]

554Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating10,580Blue band · top ~51.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12642 of 17372 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

9,890Peak Premier on CSDB
862Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 862
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 39 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,580
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,420 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRicher than youPREMIER10,580 · Blue bandPEAK ELO862csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning33
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50464Last 10050%Win rateWWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression3.1
Utility2.7
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning3.3
Utility2.7
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time621ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–2
130Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC1971237%-0.03
nukeS1510567%-0.02
ancientB147750%-0.04
cacheB115645%-0.03
anubisA117464%-0.03
infernoC114736%-0.02
dust2A85363%-0.03
trainB63350%-0.05
boulder2020%-0.06
debris1010%-0.10
shelter110100%-0.04
fachwerk110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
53%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
63.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2450%0.7611.9
Anubis2157%0.8213.0
Ancient1267%0.8012.1
Nuke1258%0.7714.6
Dust21155%0.8511.3
Inferno520%0.8411.0
Cache540%0.629.4
Overpass10%0.9313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
622msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
7.38HE damage / grenade
2.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4208 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0087% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0224%28 Aug
ancient13–9-0.046%28 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0125%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0710%25 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0719%25 Aug
train13–10-0.0510%25 Aug
ancient13–0-0.0119%25 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0925%23 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0014%23 Aug
dust213–9-0.0319%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0219%20 Aug
dust213–11-0.078%19 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0111%19 Aug
debris7–9-0.1016%18 Aug
train3–13-0.0923%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0714%17 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0913%15 Aug
nuke13–110.0218%15 Aug
ancient13–90.0114%14 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0424%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0323%13 Aug
nuke13–70.0324%13 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0428%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.035%7 Aug
nuke14–160.0015%5 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0617%4 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0314%4 Aug
shelter10–8-0.0415%4 Aug
dust213–90.0119%4 Aug
boulder10–13-0.0815%4 Aug
fachwerk13–9-0.0617%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0014%2 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0617%2 Aug
nuke13–60.0218%2 Aug
train13–9-0.0621%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0427%1 Aug
inferno8–130.0222%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0611%31 Jul
dust213–9-0.0216%31 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0935%31 Jul
mirage9–7-0.0824%31 Jul
mirage13–20.1023%31 Jul
nuke1–13-0.077%30 Jul
mirage12–12-0.067%30 Jul
dust213–6-0.0422%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.0319%30 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0227%30 Jul
mirage13–50.0520%30 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0116%29 Jul
train7–13-0.049%28 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0912%28 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0318%28 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0514%28 Jul
cache5–13-0.0537%26 Jul
anubis13–60.0217%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0127%26 Jul
cache13–7-0.049%26 Jul
ancient13–50.0113%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.0821%26 Jul
mirage8–13-0.010%26 Jul
ancient5–130.0214%25 Jul
inferno13–20.1010%25 Jul
nuke13–50.0417%25 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0516%25 Jul
train13–5-0.0210%25 Jul
anubis13–11-0.057%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.048%25 Jul
nuke13–9-0.056%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.087%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0716%25 Jul
train12–12-0.039%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.049%24 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0513%24 Jul
dust24–13-0.0119%24 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0913%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0720%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1211%23 Jul
ancient7–13-0.086%23 Jul
mirage13–20.0313%23 Jul
inferno13–80.025%23 Jul
mirage7–1-0.100%23 Jul
mirage4–10.0617%23 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0817%22 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0323%20 Jul
cache13–6-0.0413%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0216%16 Jul
dust28–130.0418%14 Jul
nuke7–13-0.056%12 Jul
anubis5–0-0.0120%12 Jul
nuke13–50.0011%12 Jul
boulder10–13-0.039%12 Jul
cache12–16-0.0412%11 Jul
ancient10–13-0.079%11 Jul
anubis5–00.0320%11 Jul
cache8–130.0517%11 Jul
cache13–10.0317%11 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0718%11 Jul
nuke13–60.0738%11 Jul
dust21–13-0.1017%10 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0419%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →