Matt

Matt — CS2 Stats

JM76561199497365866[U:1:1537100138]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,618Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,650Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,545Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26296 of 251263 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,289 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−449Premier CS Rating · 24,994 → 24,545

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,545 +6,817 31 Aug – 11 Oct · 22 days played
17,44025,990peak 25,99031 Aug11 Oct
25,990Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,289Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,289
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,445 below peak (25,990)
  • -564 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 455 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches68——
Win rate49%——
K/D1.06——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate46.0%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy0.5%12.4%12.7%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.031.050.04 short
Match win rate47.5%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMattFACEITLevel 6 · 1,289 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER24,545 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,289csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning54
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–36–5Last 10059%Win rateLWLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time511ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 529ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 13 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 6–1 · dust2, 10 Sept →
313msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2313–1057%0.03
dust2A2012–860%-0.01
ancientS1511–473%0.00
infernoC146–843%-0.01
nukeS129–375%0.02
cacheS96–367%-0.01
anubisD62–433%-0.01
office—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,134Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
1,917Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
46.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
0.5%Shot accuracy
4,276MVPs
1,650Hours (in match)
1,865Bombs planted
596Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,702dust2
2,193inferno
2,003nuke
576vertigo
454train
43office
18italy
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches
53%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
79.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4961%0.9614.8
Mirage3453%1.0414.9
Dust22854%1.0516.9
Nuke1850%1.0815.9
Anubis1644%0.9614.1
Inferno1233%1.1014.9
Cache944%1.0215.1
Overpass771%1.1917.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
511msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
8.12HE damage / grenade
10.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.6752% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0618%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.0320%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0719%9 Oct →
mirage10–130.0013%8 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0912%7 Oct →
mirage7–130.0221%6 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0019%6 Oct →
mirage13–110.0713%6 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0017%5 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0211%4 Oct →
cache13–90.0220%3 Oct →
dust213–60.0127%3 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0124%2 Oct →
cache13–0-0.065%2 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.039%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0210%1 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0520%30 Sept →
inferno12–120.0018%28 Sept →
dust213–90.0731%28 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0810%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0313%20 Sept →
mirage6–130.0925%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0218%15 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.1217%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0618%14 Sept →
inferno13–80.0927%14 Sept →
ancient3–40.0930%14 Sept →
ancient13–40.0322%14 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0116%14 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0416%13 Sept →
mirage13–20.1819%13 Sept →
dust25–130.0517%12 Sept →
nuke13–60.1221%12 Sept →
dust22–8-0.0411%12 Sept →
mirage13–70.1224%11 Sept →
dust213–70.0233%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.0523%11 Sept →
dust213–70.0815%11 Sept →
mirage13–50.0317%11 Sept →
mirage13–60.1224%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0615%10 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0013%10 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0318%10 Sept →
dust26–10.0444%10 Sept →
nuke13–70.0512%10 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0512%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.0223%10 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0216%10 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0823%10 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0611%10 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0615%9 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0525%9 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0811%9 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0217%9 Sept →
cache13–100.0720%9 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0216%9 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0116%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0721%8 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0122%8 Sept →
mirage13–20.0416%8 Sept →
nuke13–100.0217%7 Sept →
ancient13–10.0240%7 Sept →
nuke13–30.0633%7 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0219%7 Sept →
inferno8–130.016%7 Sept →
anubis13–20.0529%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0313%6 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0519%6 Sept →
inferno13–50.0919%6 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0218%6 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0424%6 Sept →
mirage13–50.1717%5 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0320%5 Sept →
inferno11–130.0213%5 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0014%4 Sept →
ancient13–40.0216%4 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0715%4 Sept →
nuke13–00.1618%4 Sept →
cache13–40.0213%4 Sept →
ancient13–60.0227%4 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0416%4 Sept →
ancient13–70.0613%4 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0512%4 Sept →
anubis11–130.0312%4 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0412%3 Sept →
mirage12–120.0916%3 Sept →
cache4–13-0.028%2 Sept →
ancient9–130.0325%2 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0615%2 Sept →
anubis16–120.0219%2 Sept →
dust25–2-0.040%2 Sept →
dust29–50.0218%2 Sept →
nuke7–130.0617%2 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0214%1 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0017%1 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.035%1 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0123%31 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.088%31 Aug →
dust212–120.0417%31 Aug →
office2–130.0033%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.