Ikuinen pöhnä

Ikuinen pöhnä — CS2 Stats

FI76561199490394915[U:1:1530129187]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

826Tracked matches36%Win rate2023Tracked since
788Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating12,561Blue band · top ~41.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 963 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,561 +592 26 Aug – 23 Sept · 11 days played
11,56514,412peak 14,41226 Aug23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 963 +0 7 Sept – 19 Sept · 2 observations
963963peak 9637 Sept19 Sept
14,440Peak Premier in tracked matches
963Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 963
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 88 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,851 below peak (14,412)
  • +592 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,439 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches9——
Win rate44%——
K/D1.06——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 19 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,888), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate47.6%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy1.1%12.0%12.4%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.021.03above
Match win rate47.0%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIkuinen pöhnäFACEITLevel 5 · 963 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,561 · Blue bandPEAK ELO963csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning57
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility5.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time591ms+51ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 1 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · nuke, 22 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 28 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 29 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2213–959%0.01
ancientA2212–1055%0.02
mirageA1810–856%0.02
cacheA1610–663%0.02
infernoD91–811%0.01
dust2D51–420%-0.03
office—30–30%0.05
vertigo—21–150%0.03
overpass—10–10%-0.01
shelter—10–10%0.07
anubis—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,396Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1,119Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1.1%Shot accuracy
2,984MVPs
541Hours (in match)
1,899Bombs planted
313Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,929nuke
1,560inferno
981vertigo
766dust2
367office
69lake
54train
28cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

99Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
83.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke2556%1.2815.4
Mirage2365%1.1315.2
Ancient1547%1.1015.2
Cache1145%1.0415.3
Inferno1060%1.5218.2
Anubis729%0.9913.3
Dust2650%0.9614.5
Overpass10%1.4423.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
597msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.38HE damage / grenade
11.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2567% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–140.0216%7 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0320%6 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0215%6 Oct →
office5–130.1223%23 Sept →
overpass5–13-0.0111%23 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0221%23 Sept →
vertigo7–130.069%22 Sept →
nuke13–100.0521%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0413%22 Sept →
ancient11–130.0416%22 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0144%22 Sept →
mirage9–130.0125%13 Sept →
office12–120.0111%12 Sept →
inferno8–130.0328%12 Sept →
cache3–13-0.019%12 Sept →
ancient13–90.0221%12 Sept →
mirage13–110.0114%12 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0516%12 Sept →
mirage13–30.0716%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.0521%10 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0420%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0226%10 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0517%9 Sept →
ancient7–130.0127%9 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0927%9 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0317%9 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0725%9 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0614%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0732%7 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0412%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0116%6 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0319%6 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0714%6 Sept →
ancient6–130.0111%5 Sept →
cache13–80.0423%5 Sept →
shelter4–70.0723%4 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0127%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0317%4 Sept →
nuke10–130.0124%4 Sept →
inferno9–60.0936%4 Sept →
ancient11–130.0220%4 Sept →
nuke14–160.0111%4 Sept →
cache13–60.0218%4 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0113%4 Sept →
mirage13–70.0113%3 Sept →
ancient6–130.0211%3 Sept →
nuke13–100.0623%3 Sept →
mirage10–130.0718%2 Sept →
cache5–130.0641%2 Sept →
nuke13–80.0132%2 Sept →
cache13–50.0820%2 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0218%2 Sept →
office3–130.0118%2 Sept →
ancient13–60.0213%2 Sept →
ancient7–130.0126%1 Sept →
ancient10–130.018%1 Sept →
mirage13–40.1312%1 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0116%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0519%31 Aug →
ancient13–80.109%31 Aug →
mirage3–11-0.0121%31 Aug →
nuke13–30.1124%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0514%31 Aug →
cache13–70.0031%31 Aug →
cache11–130.1314%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0526%30 Aug →
nuke13–90.1022%30 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0612%30 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0113%30 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0224%30 Aug →
mirage13–70.0311%30 Aug →
dust27–130.0420%30 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0215%29 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0318%29 Aug →
mirage13–100.0117%29 Aug →
nuke13–70.0935%29 Aug →
inferno10–130.0717%29 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0121%29 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0025%29 Aug →
ancient13–20.0316%29 Aug →
vertigo9–6-0.0136%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0216%29 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0214%29 Aug →
mirage15–150.1314%29 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0222%28 Aug →
ancient13–100.0320%28 Aug →
cache16–130.0114%28 Aug →
ancient8–130.0824%28 Aug →
dust213–11-0.038%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0521%28 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0719%27 Aug →
nuke12–120.0116%27 Aug →
nuke6–130.0426%27 Aug →
inferno6–130.0414%26 Aug →
ancient4–130.0213%26 Aug →
ancient13–110.0322%26 Aug →
cache8–00.0626%26 Aug →
inferno12–160.0419%26 Aug →
mirage13–50.0415%26 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0613%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.