Luck

Luck — CS2 Stats

FI76561199010841053[U:1:1050575325]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

812Tracked matches30%Win rate2025Tracked since
737Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,295Top 50% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70796 of 228464 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,080 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,295 → 20,295
0Faceit ELO · 1,080 → 1,080
+2Tracked matches · now 812
+3.3ppWin rate · 26.7% → 30.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 17 days played since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,295 +868 28 Aug18 Sept · 11 days played
19,42722,960peak 22,96028 Aug18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,080 +0 6 Sept18 Sept · 3 observations
1,0801,080peak 1,0806 Sept18 Sept
23,313Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,080Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
17Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,080
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 121 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,665 below peak (22,960)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,705 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,543), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.7%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.8%12.7%13.0%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.051.06above
Match win rate50.6%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLuckFACEITLevel 7 · 1,080 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,295 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,080csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning54
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5545Last 10055%Win rateLWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility2.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch5.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.4
Utility2.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time564ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–7 · nuke, 3 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–2 · inferno, 5 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · cache, 2 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

18Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA29161355%0.03
ancientB26131350%0.01
cacheS1611569%0.02
mirageA138562%0.01
infernoC83538%-0.02
dust241325%0.00
anubis32167%0.05
office110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,463Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
1,140Matches
50.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
0.8%Shot accuracy
3,350MVPs
389Hours (in match)
864Bombs planted
289Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,178nuke
1,691inferno
1,076dust2
407train
377vertigo
75office
14italy
8cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

107Matches
55%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
93.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke2759%1.1317.6
Mirage2662%1.1517.0
Ancient2133%1.1716.0
Cache1362%1.4219.4
Inferno875%1.4722.5
Anubis729%1.3317.6
Dust2367%1.7820.0
Overpass2100%1.5322.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
561msReaction time
47.4%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
8.88HE damage / grenade
1.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4016 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–12-0.0226%18 Sept
anubis13–10.0838%18 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0413%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0222%14 Sept
nuke10–130.0922%14 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0119%14 Sept
cache8–13-0.0414%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0116%11 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0620%11 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0316%11 Sept
nuke12–16-0.0718%10 Sept
inferno13–100.0413%10 Sept
nuke13–40.1424%10 Sept
nuke13–80.0725%10 Sept
nuke6–9-0.0322%10 Sept
nuke9–130.0423%10 Sept
ancient9–13-0.066%10 Sept
ancient9–130.0134%10 Sept
inferno14–160.0111%9 Sept
ancient13–110.0017%9 Sept
cache10–130.0327%9 Sept
ancient7–130.0519%9 Sept
nuke5–130.0126%9 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0627%9 Sept
dust23–13-0.0239%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0327%9 Sept
mirage13–80.1631%8 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0519%7 Sept
cache11–13-0.0810%7 Sept
cache13–80.0816%7 Sept
ancient9–130.0020%6 Sept
dust26–130.0427%6 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0322%6 Sept
ancient13–80.0629%6 Sept
nuke13–70.0617%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0020%6 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0118%5 Sept
ancient13–100.0125%5 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0738%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0112%5 Sept
inferno5–2-0.0250%5 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0125%5 Sept
cache13–60.1029%5 Sept
nuke9–40.2125%5 Sept
nuke4–9-0.0818%5 Sept
mirage6–130.0134%5 Sept
nuke13–10.1222%4 Sept
cache13–90.0423%4 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0323%4 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0121%4 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0320%4 Sept
nuke14–160.0222%4 Sept
cache13–80.1030%4 Sept
nuke9–70.0921%4 Sept
nuke9–00.0720%4 Sept
cache13–6-0.0520%4 Sept
cache4–130.0326%4 Sept
mirage13–70.1026%4 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0218%4 Sept
ancient13–20.0113%3 Sept
nuke9–70.2418%3 Sept
mirage13–70.037%3 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0421%3 Sept
mirage17–19-0.0124%3 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0119%3 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0414%3 Sept
office13–80.1113%3 Sept
cache5–13-0.0313%2 Sept
nuke13–80.0317%2 Sept
cache13–110.0017%2 Sept
mirage10–13-0.069%1 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0518%1 Sept
ancient10–130.0218%1 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0213%1 Sept
nuke10–130.0344%1 Sept
cache13–70.0819%31 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0420%31 Aug
mirage3–11-0.0411%31 Aug
nuke13–30.0521%31 Aug
cache13–80.0921%31 Aug
mirage13–110.0415%30 Aug
nuke13–90.0216%30 Aug
ancient13–60.0929%30 Aug
ancient13–80.2026%30 Aug
anubis13–60.0515%30 Aug
inferno9–40.0317%30 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0222%30 Aug
mirage13–80.0015%30 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0516%29 Aug
ancient13–20.0420%29 Aug
nuke13–80.0120%29 Aug
cache13–80.0127%29 Aug
cache13–11-0.0321%29 Aug
ancient13–100.0516%28 Aug
ancient13–100.0222%28 Aug
cache16–130.049%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0417%28 Aug
dust213–110.0213%28 Aug
anubis9–130.0118%28 Aug
ancient3–13-0.077%28 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches18-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →