𝙒𝙚𝙞𝙙𝙚ツ — CS2 Stats

DK76561199485042105[U:1:1524776377]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

739Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,868Hours in CS52Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport

CSDB Leaderboard#221782 of 239539 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,670 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,670 → 1,670

+30Tracked matches · now 739

0.0ppWin rate · 55.2% → 55.2%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,612 +89 27 May – 29 Jun · 3 days played

20,612Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,670Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

34Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,670
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 81 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10
Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,804), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	51.5%	48.3%	51.0%	meets
Shot accuracy	1.3%	13.2%	13.7%	12.4% short
Kill/death ratio	1.87	1.07	1.09	above
Match win rate	52.2%	46.9%	48.4%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning49

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–36–6Last 10058%Win rateWWWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −77ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

5–0 · 100% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

13–6–1 · 65% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.0

Utility5.5

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning4.9

Utility5.5

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels0.4

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time560ms−17ms

first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms

Headshot accuracy14.7%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 8–8 · inferno, 13 May →

39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 15 Sept →

313msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · anubis, 21 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

W5Current streak

13–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	27	16–11	59%	0.00
anubis	S	21	14–7	67%	-0.02
nuke	A	18	10–8	56%	0.01
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
mirage	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
dust2	D	7	2–5	29%	0.00
vertigo	S	5	4–1	80%	0.01
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,270Lifetime kills

1.87K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players

1,168Matches

52.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players

51.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players

1.3%Shot accuracy

3,919MVPs

539Hours (in match)

1,370Bombs planted

439Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,186

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,466

AWP2,462

Desert Eagle2,451

P2000 / USP-S1,950

Glock-181,455

FAMAS932

MP9755

Galil AR642

MAC-10565

Lifetime map wins

1,999nuke

1,546inferno

828vertigo

789dust2

257train

212office

53italy

13cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

201Matches

57%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

76.5ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	46	65%	1.07	17.1
Mirage	41	46%	1.14	16.0
Nuke	37	59%	1.16	16.6
Inferno	25	64%	1.17	16.9
Anubis	14	50%	1.02	15.5
Dust2	14	43%	0.90	12.5
Vertigo	12	58%	1.44	17.0
Overpass	6	50%	0.92	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy

38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.6%Spray accuracy

80.4%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

565msReaction time

23.3%T opening success

33.6%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

3.5%Flash assists

9.22HE damage / grenade

10.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3857 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.3333% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–1	0.09	15%	21 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.03	11%	21 Sept →
anubis	7–1	-0.02	8%	21 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.05	30%	21 Sept →
ancient	16–13	0.06	25%	17 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	11%	17 Sept →
nuke	19–17	-0.05	18%	17 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.09	17%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.02	12%	15 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	17%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.03	39%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.03	15%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	15 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.01	16%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.00	7%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.03	29%	14 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	11%	14 Sept →
anubis	16–12	0.02	13%	13 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.02	17%	12 Sept →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	11%	12 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	14%	12 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	18%	11 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.02	24%	11 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.13	7%	9 Sept →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	8%	9 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	3%	7 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	7%	31 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.08	0%	31 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.11	15%	31 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.10	12%	29 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	19%	29 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.01	6%	29 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	13%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	19%	26 Aug →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	12%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	15%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	20%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	12%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.02	16%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	9%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.04	21%	12 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	28%	12 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	9%	10 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	17%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	13%	10 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.03	17%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.04	8%	10 Aug →
ancient	28–26	-0.01	16%	9 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.02	21%	9 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	20%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.09	21%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.01	21%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	19%	8 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	14%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	14%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–19	-0.03	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	19–17	-0.00	8%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	18%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.00	24%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	15%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	7%	7 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	21%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.10	14%	1 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	9%	1 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	26%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	21%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.01	19%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.08	14%	29 Jun →
nuke	1–13	-0.04	21%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	12%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.05	7%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	16%	24 Jun →
ancient	12–12	-0.01	10%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	7%	24 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.02	18%	22 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.08	14%	22 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.03	13%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.06	25%	22 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.01	14%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.09	7%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.13	18%	18 Jun →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	6%	17 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	15%	17 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	20%	17 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.02	15%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.05	14%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–2	-0.03	13%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	20%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–1	0.06	24%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.03	8%	15 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	18%	10 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	9%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.01	21%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.03	16%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	0.05	17%	27 May →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	18%	27 May →
nuke	10–13	0.01	20%	27 May →
inferno	13–1	-0.04	13%	27 May →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	13%	18 May →
inferno	8–8	0.14	20%	13 May →