shad

shad — CS2 Stats

KH76561199471220187[U:1:1510954459]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,188Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
2,837Hours in CS64Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,205Blue band · top ~32.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 681 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,205 -1,662 7 Sept – 14 Nov · 28 days played
13,02816,503peak 16,5037 Sept14 Nov
16,503Peak Premier in tracked matches
681Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-09-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 681
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,298 below peak (16,503)
  • -794 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 795 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate71.2%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio2.101.021.03above
Match win rate47.9%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshadFACEITLevel 5 · 681 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,205 · Blue bandPEAK ELO681csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning74
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–56–5Last 10039%Win rateWLLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility5.7
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning7.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time574ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 16 Oct →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · nuke, 16 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · mirage, 30 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2410–1442%0.01
mirageB2311–1248%-0.01
ancientD195–1426%-0.02
nukeA116–555%0.02
cacheD93–633%-0.00
infernoC83–538%0.03
anubisD50–50%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,754Lifetime kills
2.10K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
1,365Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
71.2%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,554MVPs
841Hours (in match)
1,717Bombs planted
507Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,660dust2
913inferno
690nuke
82vertigo
17office
5train
5ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

282Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
69.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211147%0.9613.6
Mirage8348%0.7612.2
Ancient3256%1.0214.4
Cache2673%1.0515.1
Nuke1050%0.8713.0
Inferno838%0.7511.9
Anubis633%0.6511.8
Overpass560%0.5810.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
577msReaction time
68.2%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.43HE damage / grenade
12.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0419%14 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0017%14 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0412%14 Nov →
ancient14–16-0.0510%14 Nov →
dust213–60.0216%14 Nov →
anubis13–16-0.008%14 Nov →
dust213–110.0725%14 Nov →
dust213–4-0.0024%14 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0620%13 Nov →
dust213–5-0.0024%12 Nov →
mirage13–110.0521%12 Nov →
dust212–12-0.0411%11 Nov →
inferno4–9-0.0426%11 Nov →
mirage13–70.0214%11 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0412%11 Nov →
mirage13–100.0114%11 Nov →
anubis7–130.019%10 Nov →
mirage15–150.0015%10 Nov →
mirage13–80.0023%10 Nov →
vertigo13–100.0118%8 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0111%8 Nov →
mirage8–130.0115%8 Nov →
dust27–130.0415%8 Nov →
mirage13–70.0010%31 Oct →
nuke7–130.0223%31 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0116%31 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0014%31 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0915%30 Oct →
dust213–60.0215%30 Oct →
nuke8–130.0014%30 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0023%30 Oct →
mirage1–9-0.0613%30 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0416%30 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0211%30 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0019%29 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0312%26 Oct →
mirage13–80.0010%26 Oct →
mirage13–50.0414%24 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0527%24 Oct →
ancient8–130.0024%23 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0212%23 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0516%22 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0315%21 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0416%21 Oct →
cache15–19-0.0511%21 Oct →
dust210–130.0019%18 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0112%17 Oct →
anubis8–130.008%17 Oct →
inferno13–70.1119%17 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0116%17 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0224%16 Oct →
inferno9–50.1821%16 Oct →
nuke9–3-0.0131%16 Oct →
ancient13–30.0128%15 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0318%15 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0211%14 Oct →
ancient10–130.018%14 Oct →
nuke13–30.1026%14 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0222%14 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.014%14 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0312%14 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0514%13 Oct →
inferno16–130.0119%9 Oct →
mirage13–20.0319%9 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.058%8 Oct →
ancient15–150.0220%8 Oct →
cache11–130.0314%8 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.085%8 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0517%8 Oct →
nuke13–90.0716%8 Oct →
dust211–130.0412%8 Oct →
cache9–130.0117%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.0412%7 Oct →
dust210–130.0515%7 Oct →
dust213–110.0216%6 Oct →
dust213–10.158%6 Oct →
nuke16–130.1014%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0714%5 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0614%5 Oct →
cache10–130.0914%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.004%5 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0112%4 Oct →
dust22–13-0.070%4 Oct →
ancient13–50.0817%4 Oct →
dust213–100.0611%3 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0311%3 Oct →
dust24–120.005%3 Oct →
mirage7–130.1021%3 Oct →
dust213–60.079%3 Oct →
ancient3–130.0715%3 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0910%2 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0819%1 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0316%1 Oct →
ancient13–60.0530%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0018%30 Sept →
nuke6–130.0112%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0717%28 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0223%28 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0821%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.099%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.