Mango

Mango — CS2 Stats

76561199471048733[U:1:1510783005]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

614Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
279Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating13,007Blue band · top ~39% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 614 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,007 +6,217 17 Mar – 15 Sept · 35 days played
5,44013,007peak 13,00717 Mar15 Sept
13,007Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2025-03-17

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,007
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,993 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,492), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.9%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy15.6%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.140.980.99above
Match win rate47.5%43.3%43.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMangoFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,007 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning51
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60–36–4Last 10060%Win rateLLWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.4

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time597ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy12.9%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.5% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 21 Apr →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · mirage, 2 May →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 21 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 10 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 50% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3723–1462%0.05
dust2B2111–1052%0.00
infernoB168–850%0.02
trainS118–373%0.04
nukeA74–357%0.02
anubis—33–0100%0.02
grail—22–0100%-0.03
agency—11–0100%-0.01
brewery—10–10%-0.20
ancient—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,955Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
809Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
43.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
1,533MVPs
279Hours (in match)
981Bombs planted
165Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,143dust2
1,051inferno
230nuke
195train
102vertigo
17lake
1cbble
1ar_monastery

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
588msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
7.25HE damage / grenade
4.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3144% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3032% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–130.0215%2 Jul →
train7–130.0110%27 May →
mirage13–3-0.012%25 May →
nuke13–110.0416%22 May →
mirage13–20.0017%22 May →
dust213–10-0.0422%20 May →
dust25–13-0.039%10 May →
mirage13–40.0612%10 May →
mirage13–9-0.066%10 May →
inferno13–00.1215%10 May →
agency13–10-0.0114%10 May →
nuke4–9-0.1910%10 May →
brewery3–9-0.203%10 May →
mirage4–130.0620%9 May →
grail12–3-0.060%8 May →
grail13–80.0117%8 May →
mirage13–20.109%7 May →
mirage13–70.0711%7 May →
inferno13–30.0210%7 May →
dust27–130.0413%5 May →
inferno16–13-0.0116%4 May →
dust213–6-0.0116%2 May →
mirage2–9-0.0333%2 May →
inferno6–9-0.029%27 Apr →
train13–70.1121%27 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.062%26 Apr →
mirage9–130.0513%26 Apr →
dust213–20.0315%26 Apr →
mirage13–20.0315%26 Apr →
mirage13–90.0811%26 Apr →
mirage4–130.0511%25 Apr →
nuke13–10.1219%25 Apr →
dust22–13-0.1116%25 Apr →
dust215–150.0521%25 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0210%24 Apr →
inferno13–50.0517%24 Apr →
mirage13–5-0.0110%24 Apr →
anubis13–100.0517%24 Apr →
mirage13–20.077%24 Apr →
train4–2-0.0413%24 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0420%23 Apr →
inferno8–8-0.0121%21 Apr →
inferno9–6-0.0215%21 Apr →
mirage13–40.0620%21 Apr →
mirage13–00.219%21 Apr →
mirage10–130.0215%21 Apr →
mirage10–40.0611%17 Apr →
train13–40.1015%17 Apr →
mirage13–80.0516%17 Apr →
inferno13–100.0210%17 Apr →
dust29–13-0.059%17 Apr →
train11–13-0.019%16 Apr →
inferno13–90.0717%13 Apr →
nuke2–130.0221%13 Apr →
nuke13–40.0721%13 Apr →
train13–80.0114%13 Apr →
train13–20.0718%12 Apr →
train3–130.0218%12 Apr →
mirage3–130.0317%12 Apr →
mirage13–40.0319%12 Apr →
dust213–100.057%12 Apr →
train13–70.0414%12 Apr →
mirage13–70.078%11 Apr →
mirage14–160.0314%10 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0116%10 Apr →
mirage13–90.0413%9 Apr →
dust27–130.0320%9 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0212%7 Apr →
dust213–60.0420%7 Apr →
mirage6–130.047%7 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0512%3 Apr →
anubis13–70.0311%3 Apr →
dust29–130.0410%3 Apr →
mirage10–130.044%3 Apr →
inferno15–150.0718%1 Apr →
mirage13–100.0311%31 Mar →
train13–110.076%29 Mar →
mirage13–00.0010%29 Mar →
train13–50.0111%28 Mar →
mirage15–150.0813%27 Mar →
dust213–110.077%27 Mar →
dust213–70.0210%27 Mar →
mirage13–30.1218%25 Mar →
dust213–11-0.049%24 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0315%24 Mar →
dust213–30.0217%24 Mar →
dust213–40.0415%23 Mar →
dust26–130.0514%23 Mar →
dust213–3-0.049%22 Mar →
mirage13–00.1715%22 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.046%20 Mar →
mirage3–130.058%20 Mar →
mirage8–130.0815%20 Mar →
mirage13–50.0613%19 Mar →
inferno12–160.0219%18 Mar →
inferno11–130.0826%18 Mar →
mirage13–30.0812%17 Mar →
mirage14–160.0516%17 Mar →
nuke9–30.128%17 Mar →
inferno5–90.0416%17 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.