Pullantuoksuinen isäntä

Pullantuoksuinen isäntä — CS2 Stats

76561199386933319[U:1:1426667591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

802Tracked matches63%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,604Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,113Purple band · top ~16% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,306 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,113 +5,593 21 Oct – 1 Nov · 9 days played
12,52018,113peak 18,11321 Oct1 Nov
18,408Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,306Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-09-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,306
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 45 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,113
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,887 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.9%46.8%48.2%2.3% short
Shot accuracy1.7%13.0%13.2%11.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.061.070.06 short
Match win rate44.9%46.3%46.9%2.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPullantuoksuinen isäntäFACEITLevel 8 · 1,306 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,113 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,306csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning74
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–39–4Last 10057%Win rateTWLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · −102ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.9
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels7.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 73% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels8.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 11 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 11 Oct →
367msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 11 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

13Longest win streak
1–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 78% over 18mirageWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2110–1148%0.02
ancientS1814–478%0.06
poseidonB158–753%0.07
infernoB147–750%0.02
cacheA85–363%0.02
dust2S86–275%0.02
anubisA74–357%0.00
mirageC52–340%0.03
overpass—21–150%0.05
shelter—10–10%-0.08
vertigo—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,367Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
1,938Matches
44.9%Match win rate
45.9%Headshot %
1.7%Shot accuracy
5,308MVPs
1,917Hours (in match)
1,299Bombs planted
483Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,213
AWP2,555
MP9989
Knife618

Lifetime map wins

2,998inferno
2,655nuke
1,753dust2
542vertigo
401train
308lake
73office
29cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

739Matches
48%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
82.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke13854%1.2117.0
Ancient13451%1.2416.9
Mirage12940%1.0814.9
Dust210940%1.0716.0
Inferno7037%1.2015.4
Anubis7054%1.1716.6
Overpass4264%1.2216.1
Train3158%1.2315.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
553msReaction time
73.0%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
4.99HE damage / grenade
10.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon8–8-0.0223%4 Nov →
inferno9–30.1519%4 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0335%1 Nov →
cache7–13-0.0140%1 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0124%1 Nov →
nuke13–90.0223%1 Nov →
ancient13–7-0.0118%1 Nov →
dust213–80.0014%31 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0021%31 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0238%31 Oct →
nuke13–90.0821%31 Oct →
ancient13–60.1220%31 Oct →
nuke13–30.0425%31 Oct →
cache13–80.0122%31 Oct →
ancient13–100.0623%30 Oct →
dust213–100.0115%30 Oct →
inferno13–80.0420%30 Oct →
nuke0–6-0.090%29 Oct →
nuke9–5-0.1520%28 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0521%28 Oct →
shelter1–5-0.080%27 Oct →
dust25–130.0318%27 Oct →
dust216–140.0413%27 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0111%27 Oct →
nuke10–30.0736%27 Oct →
cache13–80.0424%27 Oct →
ancient13–100.0114%27 Oct →
mirage20–220.0121%26 Oct →
inferno9–130.0228%26 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0229%25 Oct →
anubis13–30.0315%25 Oct →
cache11–130.0623%24 Oct →
cache8–00.0035%24 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0019%24 Oct →
mirage13–20.1328%24 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0116%24 Oct →
inferno7–130.0125%24 Oct →
dust213–0-0.0830%24 Oct →
ancient13–100.0923%23 Oct →
anubis13–50.0332%23 Oct →
ancient13–50.0120%23 Oct →
dust213–10.0616%23 Oct →
anubis13–60.0112%21 Oct →
ancient13–20.2134%21 Oct →
cache5–13-0.049%21 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0012%20 Oct →
ancient8–130.1025%19 Oct →
ancient9–130.0217%19 Oct →
nuke15–150.0027%17 Oct →
inferno9–5-0.0138%17 Oct →
cache13–30.1116%17 Oct →
anubis13–100.0213%17 Oct →
poseidon5–9-0.0122%16 Oct →
mirage8–130.026%15 Oct →
ancient13–20.068%15 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.0718%14 Oct →
poseidon6–90.0723%14 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0928%14 Oct →
nuke13–70.0322%14 Oct →
inferno4–90.0219%14 Oct →
poseidon4–9-0.0222%11 Oct →
poseidon9–10.3233%11 Oct →
poseidon9–10.0443%11 Oct →
poseidon9–50.0015%11 Oct →
poseidon9–00.0619%11 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.0114%11 Oct →
nuke9–00.0514%11 Oct →
poseidon9–10.1927%11 Oct →
nuke9–10.2619%11 Oct →
overpass9–60.1016%11 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0944%11 Oct →
inferno9–60.0420%11 Oct →
nuke9–50.2025%11 Oct →
ancient13–20.0223%11 Oct →
dust28–130.0220%11 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.0519%11 Oct →
poseidon9–50.0832%11 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0239%11 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0414%10 Oct →
poseidon9–0-0.0023%10 Oct →
overpass7–90.0130%10 Oct →
inferno9–10.1932%10 Oct →
vertigo2–9-0.0819%10 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.1121%10 Oct →
poseidon9–10.2531%10 Oct →
inferno9–60.0118%10 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0721%10 Oct →
dust24–10.1123%6 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0822%6 Oct →
nuke8–130.0518%6 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0317%5 Oct →
anubis7–130.0216%30 Sept →
mirage9–130.0326%30 Sept →
nuke6–130.0923%26 Sept →
cache13–50.0218%26 Sept →
ancient8–130.1317%26 Sept →
ancient13–60.0817%26 Sept →
ancient13–10.1435%24 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0124%19 Sept →
nuke13–40.1127%19 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches13-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.