pussygetter420

pussygetter420 — CS2 Stats

GB76561199371964876[U:1:1411699148]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,113Tracked matches31%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (59 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+96Tracked matches · now 3,113
−6.3ppWin rate · 37.0% → 30.8%

Rating over time

23,848Peak Premier on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpussygetter420FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning62
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–37–11Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLTLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 4–13–3 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility3.8
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.2
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 5–0 · dust2, 25 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · ancient, 11 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C239–1439%0.01
mirageB2312–1152%0.02
infernoD123–925%0.05
cacheA117–464%0.02
nukeA117–464%-0.00
ancientS86–275%0.02
trainS54–180%0.04
anubis—42–250%0.01
vertigo—32–167%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

954Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
76.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13354%1.1316.6
Ancient7348%1.0616.3
Anubis6148%1.0715.9
Vertigo5258%1.1917.6
Nuke4260%1.4517.8
Dust24238%1.0015.2
Inferno2450%1.0013.5
Overpass1233%0.9817.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
597msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
6.98HE damage / grenade
4.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.475 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust22–13-0.039%31 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0726%30 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0520%30 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0220%30 Oct →
mirage1–9-0.0419%30 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0223%21 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0813%21 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0021%20 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0328%18 Oct →
inferno12–120.0115%18 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0213%16 Oct →
cache13–60.0129%16 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0726%5 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.027%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.2113%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0720%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0623%2 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0526%1 Oct →
inferno5–130.1318%1 Oct →
nuke11–130.0317%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0915%1 Oct →
dust211–130.0217%1 Oct →
dust212–120.0913%28 Sept →
ancient13–30.1014%28 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0610%28 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0419%25 Sept →
inferno13–40.1716%25 Sept →
train2–13-0.0127%25 Sept →
dust25–00.2131%25 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0016%25 Sept →
dust25–13-0.1011%25 Sept →
inferno9–130.0516%25 Sept →
mirage13–30.1113%25 Sept →
dust213–100.1014%25 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.038%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0319%20 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0617%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0517%19 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.049%19 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0218%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0037%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0922%13 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0334%13 Sept →
dust213–40.1324%13 Sept →
mirage8–130.0317%13 Sept →
mirage12–120.0922%13 Sept →
cache13–110.0818%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0113%13 Sept →
inferno3–130.0213%13 Sept →
vertigo13–80.1212%13 Sept →
cache13–60.0818%13 Sept →
mirage13–60.0521%13 Sept →
ancient13–30.0721%13 Sept →
train13–30.0921%13 Sept →
dust213–90.0718%13 Sept →
nuke13–80.0414%13 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.1014%12 Sept →
anubis13–60.0218%12 Sept →
nuke12–6-0.0116%12 Sept →
train13–90.0113%12 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0126%12 Sept →
mirage12–120.0124%12 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0121%12 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0320%11 Sept →
ancient13–110.0215%11 Sept →
ancient5–0-0.0940%11 Sept →
cache13–50.0012%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1214%11 Sept →
nuke5–11-0.0228%11 Sept →
mirage12–120.0718%11 Sept →
dust213–60.0221%11 Sept →
inferno13–90.0311%11 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0823%11 Sept →
train13–90.0227%11 Sept →
inferno12–120.0519%11 Sept →
nuke13–30.0811%11 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0217%11 Sept →
cache13–20.0210%11 Sept →
vertigo3–130.0020%11 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0135%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0423%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.1314%7 Sept →
train13–40.0925%7 Sept →
anubis5–50.0510%7 Sept →
cache13–10.2117%7 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0614%7 Sept →
ancient13–40.149%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0715%7 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0331%7 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0218%7 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0219%7 Sept →
ancient13–60.0115%7 Sept →
nuke13–40.0518%7 Sept →
dust213–60.0426%7 Sept →
inferno12–120.139%5 Sept →
dust25–130.0219%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.1024%5 Sept →
mirage11–130.0914%5 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0024%5 Sept →
mirage13–60.0721%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.