Gn Streaks

Gn Streaks — CS2 Stats

US76561199309211728[U:1:1348946000]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,437Tracked matches83%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,926Hours in CS34Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating13,786Blue band · top ~34.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 834 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,786 +208 2 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 days played
13,57813,899peak 13,8992 Sept23 Sept
13,899Peak Premier in tracked matches
854Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • 20 below peak (854)
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 113 below peak (13,899)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,214 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches115——
Win rate65%——
K/D0.68——
Headshot %62%——

Measured 15 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate55.5%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy1.0%11.3%12.0%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.991.020.16 short
Match win rate44.3%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGn StreaksFACEITLevel 4 · 834 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,786 · Blue bandPEAK ELO854csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning43
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT70–25–5Last 10070%Win rateWWWWWWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 9–0–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 49% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.3
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time577ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 10–0 · ancient, 17 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · vertigo, 23 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 3 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W8Current streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 90% over 10ancientWeakest map · 50% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S1813–572%-0.05
cacheB137–654%-0.02
mirageS129–375%-0.01
nukeS109–190%0.00
anubisS108–280%-0.03
ancientB105–550%-0.02
trainS98–189%-0.02
vertigoS64–267%-0.04
infernoS64–267%-0.04
overpass—43–175%-0.04
office—10–10%-0.03
italy—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,562Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
2,709Matches
44.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
55.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
1.0%Shot accuracy
4,653MVPs
1,761Hours (in match)
1,112Bombs planted
639Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,475nuke
2,873dust2
2,117inferno
2,100vertigo
1,235train
981office
113lake
87italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
43%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
70.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5446%0.8714.2
Ancient3043%0.8913.6
Nuke2544%0.9715.0
Dust21926%0.7912.8
Anubis1443%0.8716.0
Inferno911%0.7011.1
Overpass875%0.619.9
Cache333%0.9414.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
584msReaction time
49.5%T opening success
32.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.02HE damage / grenade
4.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.2519% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0018%13 Oct →
train13–30.0311%13 Oct →
nuke13–30.0046%13 Oct →
anubis13–100.0519%13 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0115%13 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0725%13 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0327%12 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.0618%12 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0123%12 Oct →
cache13–10.0235%11 Oct →
dust213–11-0.068%11 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0117%11 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0718%11 Oct →
train13–7-0.0624%11 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0726%11 Oct →
mirage6–130.0224%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0613%10 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0526%10 Oct →
mirage13–70.0110%10 Oct →
train13–1-0.0225%10 Oct →
dust213–20.0128%10 Oct →
overpass13–6-0.0510%10 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.1111%10 Oct →
nuke13–20.0414%10 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0312%10 Oct →
train3–00.010%10 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0337%10 Oct →
cache9–1-0.0620%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.1019%7 Oct →
train13–6-0.0124%7 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0315%4 Oct →
train13–2-0.0325%4 Oct →
nuke13–80.0419%4 Oct →
mirage19–170.0214%4 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.057%3 Oct →
train12–120.0117%3 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0217%3 Oct →
nuke6–0-0.029%3 Oct →
overpass8–13-0.0519%3 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0215%3 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0417%3 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0922%3 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0836%3 Oct →
anubis13–50.0114%3 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1110%2 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0013%29 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0413%29 Sept →
train13–11-0.0910%26 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0516%26 Sept →
anubis13–110.0311%26 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0119%26 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0517%26 Sept →
ancient13–160.0314%25 Sept →
mirage13–80.028%25 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.039%24 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.090%24 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0711%24 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0350%23 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0221%23 Sept →
dust28–4-0.0714%23 Sept →
ancient6–1-0.0518%23 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0128%23 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.0114%23 Sept →
cache12–120.0319%23 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0610%22 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0318%22 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0315%22 Sept →
overpass13–2-0.0418%22 Sept →
mirage13–160.0314%21 Sept →
nuke13–90.0812%20 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0521%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0011%19 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0410%19 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0117%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0618%19 Sept →
cache13–1-0.048%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0114%19 Sept →
nuke13–20.0319%19 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0713%19 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0717%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0330%19 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0514%19 Sept →
office12–12-0.0313%18 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.1120%18 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0727%18 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0522%18 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0517%18 Sept →
overpass13–4-0.0310%17 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0615%17 Sept →
ancient10–00.1227%17 Sept →
dust213–11-0.068%17 Sept →
vertigo11–6-0.0514%17 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0314%14 Sept →
train13–2-0.0319%14 Sept →
cache8–130.0434%14 Sept →
dust213–4-0.098%14 Sept →
mirage13–30.0314%14 Sept →
nuke13–40.0223%14 Sept →
italy11–13-0.0123%13 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0310%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.