Veibel

Veibel — CS2 Stats

76561199284154404[U:1:1323888676]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,748Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
4,472Hours in CS65Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,895Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,275 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,895 -2,227 22 Jul – 6 Oct · 16 days played
14,89517,364peak 17,36422 Jul6 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,275 +0 30 Aug – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,2751,275peak 1,27530 Aug20 Sept
17,578Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,275Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-07-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,275
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 76 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,469 below peak (17,364)
  • -1,620 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,227 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 105 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches211195+16
Win rate44%48%−4pp
K/D0.991.13−0.15
Headshot %54%52%+2pp

Measured 4 Oct 2026 → 5 Nov 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 4 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate49.7%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy2.9%12.4%12.7%9.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.031.050.18 short
Match win rate44.9%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVeibelFACEITLevel 6 · 1,275 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER14,895 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,275csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning53
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–59–2Last 10039%Win rateLLWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −12.5pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time624ms−115ms
first ⅓ avg 739ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 31 Aug →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · office, 3 Sept →
500msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 23 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 65% over 17nukeWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC259–1636%-0.01
cacheC208–1240%0.00
anubisS1711–665%0.03
nukeD164–1225%-0.01
dust2D103–730%-0.02
mirageD62–433%-0.03
train—21–150%0.04
office—20–20%-0.00
inferno—21–150%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

70,165Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
4,686Matches
44.9%Match win rate
49.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2.9%Shot accuracy
9,651MVPs
1,802Hours (in match)
6,480Bombs planted
1,150Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,705
AWP6,905
MP92,917
FAMAS2,150
MAC-101,938

Lifetime map wins

6,466inferno
5,390nuke
3,584dust2
2,491vertigo
2,188train
143office
70italy
57lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,677Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient38955%1.1116.4
Anubis27951%1.0915.8
Mirage26241%0.9114.3
Nuke21752%1.0716.3
Inferno16741%0.9714.8
Dust213148%0.9214.2
Vertigo9446%1.0415.3
Cache5746%1.2417.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
617msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
6.76HE damage / grenade
10.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.194% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–13-0.089%1 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0318%30 Oct →
ancient16–120.0814%25 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0519%24 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0715%23 Oct →
dust22–13-0.076%23 Oct →
anubis13–90.0824%19 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0219%18 Oct →
anubis13–50.0418%17 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0419%12 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0428%11 Oct →
train13–70.0441%11 Oct →
train10–130.0526%11 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0811%6 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0432%6 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0324%6 Oct →
cache13–20.0642%6 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0128%5 Oct →
dust29–130.0330%5 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0125%5 Oct →
cache13–40.0124%5 Oct →
cache7–130.0728%5 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0722%4 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0320%4 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0020%4 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0139%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0811%4 Oct →
nuke11–130.0027%4 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0120%3 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0421%3 Oct →
ancient13–90.0419%3 Oct →
ancient13–60.0116%2 Oct →
cache10–130.0226%2 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0124%30 Sept →
nuke0–100.0113%29 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0418%27 Sept →
anubis11–130.0219%26 Sept →
ancient13–100.0529%26 Sept →
cache13–60.0229%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0844%25 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0219%24 Sept →
cache7–130.0214%18 Sept →
ancient10–130.0719%16 Sept →
anubis13–80.0320%13 Sept →
anubis13–50.1027%12 Sept →
ancient11–130.0125%11 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0327%6 Sept →
nuke9–130.0323%4 Sept →
anubis14–160.0329%3 Sept →
office8–13-0.0153%3 Sept →
office8–130.0123%2 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0224%1 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0324%31 Aug →
anubis13–40.1027%31 Aug →
ancient9–130.0329%30 Aug →
nuke11–130.0131%29 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0427%27 Aug →
anubis13–30.0826%27 Aug →
anubis13–30.0223%27 Aug →
dust210–130.0122%27 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.1124%27 Aug →
anubis9–130.0116%26 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0322%26 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0519%26 Aug →
ancient13–100.0417%25 Aug →
nuke13–20.0113%25 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0616%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0229%25 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0414%23 Aug →
cache6–130.1020%23 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0519%23 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0117%23 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0320%23 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.098%21 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0221%21 Aug →
inferno6–1-0.0233%26 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0729%26 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0412%26 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0224%26 Jul →
ancient3–130.0523%26 Jul →
cache16–130.0126%24 Jul →
dust213–100.0535%24 Jul →
cache14–160.0224%24 Jul →
anubis5–130.0538%24 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0924%23 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0521%23 Jul →
ancient13–40.0517%23 Jul →
anubis0–13-0.0030%23 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0124%23 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0130%23 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0325%23 Jul →
anubis16–140.0236%23 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0329%23 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0633%23 Jul →
nuke13–00.0235%23 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0331%23 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0313%23 Jul →
mirage13–110.0233%23 Jul →
anubis13–100.0126%22 Jul →
nuke14–160.0118%22 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.