basement specimen

basement specimen — CS2 Stats

76561198096935650[U:1:136669922]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,367Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,892Light Blue band · top ~55.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 5 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,892 -2,951 7 Aug18 Sept · 21 days played
9,89213,726peak 13,7267 Aug18 Sept
14,174Peak Premier in tracked matches
836Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-07-05

Faceit ELO

  • 19 below peak (836)
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 84 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,834 below peak (13,726)
  • -3,638 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 108 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbasement specimenPREMIER9,892 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO836csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41563Last 10041%Win rateLLLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility3.8
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time633ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 730ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 10 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 13 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 5 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 11infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC28121643%-0.02
nukeB2091145%-0.03
anubisC146843%-0.02
dust2C114736%-0.00
cacheA116555%-0.01
mirageC83538%-0.02
infernoD71614%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

256Matches
48%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
70.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5149%0.8113.2
Anubis4646%0.8513.8
Mirage3644%0.8212.6
Nuke3453%0.7812.1
Inferno2162%1.0116.1
Dust21127%0.8912.8
Vertigo757%1.159.0
Overpass667%0.7412.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
623msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
6.81HE damage / grenade
3.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.484 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8615% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0517%18 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0414%18 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0520%18 Sept
dust29–13-0.0115%18 Sept
anubis13–80.048%18 Sept
dust25–13-0.0426%18 Sept
nuke16–13-0.008%13 Sept
nuke13–100.0322%13 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0217%13 Sept
dust26–13-0.0242%13 Sept
dust211–13-0.0126%13 Sept
nuke6–130.0119%13 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0518%11 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0518%11 Sept
ancient13–3-0.019%11 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0915%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0221%6 Sept
cache13–20.0119%6 Sept
ancient8–5-0.0212%6 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0612%5 Sept
cache9–13-0.0520%5 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0719%5 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0412%5 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0216%5 Sept
dust213–80.0625%5 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0511%30 Aug
ancient13–30.0313%30 Aug
nuke13–110.0015%28 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0215%28 Aug
ancient13–40.0227%28 Aug
cache6–13-0.0713%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0215%23 Aug
nuke11–13-0.027%23 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0530%23 Aug
vertigo3–9-0.0930%23 Aug
anubis4–130.0224%21 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0218%21 Aug
nuke4–130.0014%21 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0323%21 Aug
dust213–80.0210%21 Aug
nuke6–13-0.029%20 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0413%20 Aug
cache9–130.0114%19 Aug
nuke12–160.0119%19 Aug
dust213–6-0.0116%19 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0221%19 Aug
cache13–4-0.077%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.069%17 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0418%17 Aug
mirage9–130.0114%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0313%16 Aug
anubis16–140.0218%16 Aug
ancient1–13-0.1118%16 Aug
mirage13–40.1320%16 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0517%16 Aug
cache13–10-0.0215%16 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0316%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0220%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0517%14 Aug
cache10–13-0.0313%14 Aug
anubis10–130.0126%13 Aug
ancient10–130.0216%13 Aug
inferno3–12-0.0319%13 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0610%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0420%13 Aug
inferno11–130.0027%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0119%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0511%11 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0611%11 Aug
inferno13–50.0415%11 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0220%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0210%11 Aug
nuke13–11-0.083%11 Aug
ancient13–00.0713%11 Aug
mirage7–13-0.069%11 Aug
cache4–13-0.128%10 Aug
ancient13–90.1118%10 Aug
cache13–50.1922%10 Aug
inferno7–90.048%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0529%10 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0714%10 Aug
ancient7–130.0118%10 Aug
ancient15–150.0113%10 Aug
nuke13–10-0.028%10 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0111%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0124%10 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0324%9 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0110%9 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0421%9 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0220%9 Aug
dust215–150.0122%9 Aug
dust213–00.000%9 Aug
ancient4–130.0021%9 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0616%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0517%8 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0621%8 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0219%7 Aug
cache13–6-0.0113%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0818%7 Aug
cache13–7-0.0016%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →