Makezu

Makezu — CS2 Stats

FI76561199279111986[U:1:1318846258]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,222Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
841Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,271 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,271 → 1,271
+1Tracked matches · now 1,222
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,800 -1,888 1 Apr – 7 Sept · 10 days played
16,12218,688peak 18,6881 Apr7 Sept
19,015Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,271Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-04-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,271
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.1%43.7%44.8%4.7% short
Shot accuracy1.9%12.0%12.4%10.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.021.030.02 short
Match win rate45.5%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMakezuFACEITLevel 5 · 1,271 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,271csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning44
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateLLWWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility4.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time630ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 9 Jul →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · vertigo, 9 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · inferno, 9 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 30 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2612–1446%0.02
mirageC187–1139%-0.01
nukeB157–847%0.00
vertigoD93–633%0.05
cacheB84–450%-0.02
dust2C73–443%-0.02
ancientS75–271%0.01
anubisD51–420%-0.00
overpass—32–167%0.03
debris—10–10%-0.06
sanctum—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,208Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
2,415Matches
45.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
40.1%Headshot %
1.9%Shot accuracy
7,930MVPs
841Hours (in match)
2,660Bombs planted
691Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,077inferno
2,920nuke
2,012vertigo
1,379dust2
515train
382lake
23office
8cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

463Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
72.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16351%1.0214.4
Inferno7154%0.9413.9
Nuke6557%1.1117.0
Dust25439%0.9713.9
Ancient4250%0.9113.6
Train2752%1.0315.8
Anubis2339%0.9915.2
Overpass1547%0.9412.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
634msReaction time
22.7%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
5.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4957 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.7119% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0226%21 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.040%10 Aug →
inferno9–5-0.0017%9 Aug →
overpass9–20.1533%9 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.0414%9 Aug →
inferno9–40.0929%9 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0117%9 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0225%4 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0811%3 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0517%30 Jul →
inferno9–130.0314%30 Jul →
cache13–10.0110%30 Jul →
dust213–90.0213%30 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.1923%30 Jul →
inferno9–50.1814%30 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0017%25 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0412%25 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0531%25 Jul →
ancient16–120.0411%25 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.1112%25 Jul →
nuke5–9-0.099%25 Jul →
dust210–20.0216%25 Jul →
vertigo7–90.055%25 Jul →
inferno9–60.109%25 Jul →
mirage13–80.059%24 Jul →
nuke13–10.0217%24 Jul →
anubis13–110.0215%24 Jul →
ancient13–50.0220%24 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0420%24 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.069%24 Jul →
cache13–10-0.067%24 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.009%24 Jul →
inferno9–30.2211%24 Jul →
nuke7–90.019%24 Jul →
inferno9–60.136%24 Jul →
vertigo3–9-0.0817%24 Jul →
overpass9–70.027%23 Jul →
vertigo9–20.0826%23 Jul →
nuke9–10.1117%23 Jul →
inferno13–50.0223%23 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0418%23 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0314%23 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0713%23 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0217%23 Jul →
mirage13–60.0117%23 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0320%23 Jul →
ancient13–90.0515%23 Jul →
nuke3–130.0217%23 Jul →
cache11–130.0318%23 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.059%23 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0310%20 Jul →
mirage12–160.0315%20 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0512%16 Jul →
anubis10–130.028%16 Jul →
ancient13–80.0114%16 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0321%16 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0022%16 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0424%16 Jul →
anubis13–160.0312%15 Jul →
inferno13–80.0213%15 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0411%15 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0022%15 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0015%15 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0517%15 Jul →
debris7–9-0.062%12 Jul →
vertigo7–9-0.027%12 Jul →
inferno8–80.0219%12 Jul →
vertigo9–30.1126%12 Jul →
vertigo1–9-0.0621%12 Jul →
vertigo8–80.1216%12 Jul →
nuke3–9-0.0121%12 Jul →
inferno8–80.057%12 Jul →
nuke16–130.036%9 Jul →
mirage13–90.0211%9 Jul →
vertigo9–10.3140%9 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0517%9 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.1012%9 Jul →
mirage13–60.0111%9 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0219%8 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.056%8 Jul →
nuke13–70.0315%8 Jul →
mirage13–90.0311%8 Jul →
inferno13–110.0214%8 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.008%7 Jul →
inferno9–70.0823%7 Jul →
inferno8–80.0529%6 Jul →
overpass6–13-0.0810%5 Jul →
inferno9–50.0923%5 Jul →
nuke9–70.0521%5 Jul →
inferno7–9-0.0213%5 Jul →
nuke10–130.0125%12 Jun →
nuke9–50.0623%12 Jun →
vertigo5–9-0.088%12 May →
cache13–10-0.0220%29 Apr →
nuke6–9-0.0714%29 Apr →
cache8–13-0.0534%29 Apr →
inferno8–8-0.1224%1 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0113%1 Apr →
ancient13–60.0115%1 Apr →
sanctum2–9-0.0510%1 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.