DAE MELVIN

DAE MELVIN — CS2 Stats

DE76561199268349872[U:1:1308084144]Steam profile ↗

1,238Tracked matches59%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,092Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidEntry Fragger
FaceitLevel 5 · 989 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate62.5%44.2%44.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.2%11.8%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.261.041.04above
Match win rate47.4%45.3%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDAE MELVINFACEITLevel 5 · 989 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning67
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD454213Last 10045%Win rateLLWLTLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.4
Aggression10.0
Utility1.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.7
Utility1.9
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time549ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy27.2%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 30.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.35Best rating — eldorado 9–2
131Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 23% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2662023%0.03
nukeB189950%0.01
mirageA1610663%0.03
vertigoD1331023%0.01
anubisS96367%0.04
dust2S64267%-0.01
ancientB63350%0.01
cache21150%0.01
eldorado21150%0.23
debris220100%0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,548Lifetime kills
1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
1,807Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
62.5%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
7,090MVPs
788Hours (in match)
2,022Bombs planted
765Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,677
AWP3,811
MP9720
Knife262

Lifetime map wins

3,324nuke
3,116inferno
1,022vertigo
994dust2
175train
5office
5ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

158Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
70.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4455%0.9213.2
Mirage3345%0.9415.5
Anubis2846%0.9513.5
Dust21540%0.9617.1
Inferno1450%0.9614.7
Nuke1354%0.7812.3
Train580%0.7610.2
Cache367%0.8313.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.7%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
583msReaction time
52.3%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
2.61HE damage / grenade
1.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3679 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–9-0.0017%28 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.1126%28 Aug
dust213–1-0.0119%27 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0417%27 Aug
inferno8–80.0534%26 Aug
ancient10–130.0415%26 Aug
anubis8–130.0628%25 Aug
mirage13–60.0716%25 Aug
cache11–13-0.0117%25 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0420%25 Aug
anubis13–110.0717%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0013%18 Aug
inferno9–20.1720%17 Aug
vertigo5–90.1016%16 Aug
nuke3–9-0.098%16 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1724%16 Aug
inferno9–40.1817%15 Aug
vertigo7–9-0.0224%15 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0026%14 Aug
vertigo4–9-0.0450%14 Aug
nuke9–60.1126%14 Aug
inferno5–90.0127%14 Aug
nuke9–70.1842%8 Aug
inferno8–80.0636%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0144%2 Aug
vertigo1–9-0.1643%30 Jul
inferno9–70.0926%30 Jul
anubis13–50.0731%26 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0132%26 Jul
vertigo4–9-0.0929%26 Jul
eldorado8–80.1044%12 Jul
debris9–30.2643%12 Jul
eldorado9–20.3548%12 Jul
debris9–20.1936%12 Jul
vertigo9–50.0540%12 Jul
inferno8–80.0938%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0543%10 Jul
cache13–50.0330%10 Jul
inferno5–9-0.0839%3 Jul
vertigo8–80.0026%3 Jul
mirage13–160.0535%27 Jun
anubis15–150.0438%27 Jun
nuke6–90.0238%26 Jun
nuke15–150.0028%26 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0725%20 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0423%12 Jun
nuke1–9-0.380%3 Jun
mirage13–70.0925%1 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0136%1 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0227%31 May
mirage12–120.0135%31 May
nuke13–110.0433%31 May
anubis7–0-0.0038%31 May
vertigo8–80.1038%30 May
inferno5–9-0.0148%30 May
anubis10–13-0.0029%28 May
anubis6–00.1033%28 May
inferno3–90.0323%28 May
nuke9–40.1230%27 May
inferno8–8-0.0326%27 May
nuke8–80.1332%25 May
inferno2–9-0.039%24 May
inferno6–90.0840%24 May
inferno9–40.2339%23 May
nuke8–80.1431%23 May
vertigo5–90.2650%22 May
nuke13–60.0527%22 May
inferno9–50.1228%22 May
vertigo5–9-0.1218%17 May
inferno9–20.2629%17 May
nuke6–90.0219%17 May
mirage4–13-0.1015%16 May
inferno6–9-0.0229%16 May
vertigo9–20.0827%16 May
mirage7–130.0147%15 May
vertigo9–30.1242%15 May
mirage13–160.0123%14 May
inferno6–9-0.0119%14 May
inferno8–130.0241%13 May
ancient13–90.0832%13 May
inferno7–9-0.0059%13 May
inferno5–9-0.1521%13 May
dust213–6-0.0016%10 May
mirage9–130.1142%10 May
nuke13–70.0537%10 May
dust22–13-0.0731%10 May
nuke13–6-0.0133%10 May
dust216–120.0122%10 May
ancient3–130.0129%10 May
nuke6–9-0.0712%10 May
mirage13–70.0537%9 May
anubis13–60.0140%9 May
dust28–13-0.0039%9 May
mirage13–70.0628%9 May
mirage13–5-0.0023%9 May
mirage13–80.0119%9 May
nuke13–5-0.0736%8 May
mirage13–7-0.0229%8 May
dust27–10.0131%8 May
mirage13–30.0242%8 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →