n41k00u98

n41k00u98 — CS2 Stats

76561199240500893[U:1:1280235165]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,257Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,980Hours in CS82Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,113Light Blue band · top ~68.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 828 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,113 -1,384 22 Aug22 Sept · 20 days played
5,0008,497peak 8,49722 Aug22 Sept
8,497Peak Premier in tracked matches
828Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 828
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 73 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,384 below peak (8,497)
  • +61 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,887 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,790), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate37.8%43.8%44.8%7.0% short
Shot accuracy0.6%12.0%12.5%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.021.040.09 short
Match win rate44.4%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGn41k00u98FACEITLevel 5 · 828 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER7,113 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO828csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning59
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43561Last 10043%Win rateLLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility2.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.9
Utility2.5
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels7.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time593ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–5 · vertigo, 27 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 26 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 21 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 22 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 53% over 32anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB32171553%0.04
mirageC1981142%0.01
dust2B136746%0.02
ancientD103730%0.02
anubisD92722%0.04
infernoB84450%0.01
cache42250%0.01
vertigo31233%0.07
train2020%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,694Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
3,544Matches
44.4%Match win rate
37.8%Headshot %
0.6%Shot accuracy
8,077MVPs
1,366Hours (in match)
1,376Bombs planted
575Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,920
AWP12,242
MP91,860
MAC-101,739
FAMAS1,254

Lifetime map wins

7,023nuke
5,361inferno
3,550dust2
1,593vertigo
1,061train
50office
16italy
12lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

496Matches
48%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
88.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10747%1.1317.2
Mirage10043%0.9114.3
Nuke8754%1.1217.8
Ancient7246%0.9416.2
Inferno5342%0.9415.0
Dust23853%1.0115.2
Vertigo2264%0.8715.7
Overpass956%1.0214.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
65.2%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
581msReaction time
70.7%T opening success
47.6%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
8.68HE damage / grenade
2.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2658 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–16-0.019%22 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0612%22 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0418%22 Sept
nuke13–100.0114%22 Sept
dust213–50.1128%22 Sept
anubis13–10.0724%22 Sept
dust213–40.0110%22 Sept
dust24–130.0122%21 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0413%21 Sept
nuke16–130.0923%21 Sept
mirage13–40.0812%21 Sept
anubis13–80.0019%21 Sept
mirage10–9-0.0417%21 Sept
ancient11–13-0.065%21 Sept
nuke13–90.0222%21 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0419%20 Sept
nuke13–90.0223%20 Sept
dust22–13-0.0123%20 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0118%20 Sept
cache13–10-0.018%20 Sept
mirage13–70.076%20 Sept
nuke13–90.0024%20 Sept
mirage5–130.0115%20 Sept
inferno13–30.0331%18 Sept
ancient13–70.1720%18 Sept
nuke9–130.0216%17 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0425%16 Sept
nuke3–130.0218%16 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0314%15 Sept
dust28–13-0.047%15 Sept
ancient13–11-0.009%14 Sept
dust213–90.0225%14 Sept
dust23–130.0224%13 Sept
nuke16–130.0316%13 Sept
dust213–50.0516%13 Sept
cache13–100.0414%13 Sept
nuke9–50.1317%13 Sept
anubis9–130.0610%13 Sept
vertigo11–130.0417%11 Sept
mirage6–130.0020%11 Sept
train6–130.028%10 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0010%10 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0428%10 Sept
dust213–110.0426%10 Sept
dust22–13-0.0417%10 Sept
nuke9–40.2220%9 Sept
dust213–90.0312%9 Sept
nuke9–50.1825%9 Sept
inferno9–130.0120%9 Sept
nuke9–60.0530%4 Sept
nuke9–130.0124%3 Sept
inferno13–60.0415%3 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0319%2 Sept
nuke9–40.1716%2 Sept
dust24–130.0111%31 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0120%30 Aug
cache10–130.0230%30 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0816%30 Aug
ancient13–90.0111%30 Aug
nuke13–40.0322%30 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0022%28 Aug
nuke9–50.1721%28 Aug
inferno11–130.0223%28 Aug
inferno13–100.0022%27 Aug
inferno5–130.0222%27 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0519%27 Aug
anubis10–130.0416%27 Aug
nuke13–90.1220%27 Aug
vertigo9–50.2214%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0812%26 Aug
mirage15–150.0013%26 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0810%26 Aug
ancient10–130.0110%26 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0816%26 Aug
cache9–130.0014%26 Aug
nuke13–160.0211%26 Aug
nuke13–90.0136%26 Aug
anubis4–130.0525%26 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0111%26 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0611%26 Aug
dust214–160.0820%26 Aug
nuke11–130.047%25 Aug
anubis6–130.0811%25 Aug
anubis6–130.0720%25 Aug
ancient3–130.0310%25 Aug
nuke13–90.0120%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.049%25 Aug
nuke6–130.0219%25 Aug
train5–13-0.0113%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.015%24 Aug
mirage3–70.0817%24 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0416%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0428%24 Aug
mirage13–40.099%23 Aug
ancient7–130.0412%23 Aug
mirage6–130.0723%23 Aug
nuke6–130.0419%23 Aug
ancient10–130.048%23 Aug
nuke11–130.0511%23 Aug
inferno11–130.0724%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →