๐“š๐”‚๐“ป๐“ช โ™ฅ

๐“š๐”‚๐“ป๐“ช โ™ฅ โ€” CS2 Stats

76561199236885396[U:1:1276619668]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,105Tracked matches39%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,812Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.7 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,294Light Blue band ยท top ~72.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating ยท 6,294 โ†’ 6,294
+43Tracked matches ยท now 1,105
โˆ’12.4ppWin rate ยท 51.7% โ†’ 39.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,294 -198 10 Sept โ€“ 5 Oct ยท 6 days played
6,2946,673peak 6,67310 Sept5 Oct
7,004Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 379 below peak (6,673)
  • -198 over 30 days ยท steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 โ€” 3,706 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate37.9%39.9%42.0%4.1% short
Shot accuracy3.5%7.0%9.6%6.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.810.920.980.17 short
Match win rate38.7%42.3%43.8%5.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐“š๐”‚๐“ป๐“ช โ™ฅPREMIER6,294 ยท Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning48
Utility9

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43โ€“49โ€“8Last 10043%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.02 avg rating ยท โˆ’1.1pp headshot accuracy ยท +36ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4โ€“1 ยท 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 10

  • 4โ€“6 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Last 20

  • 7โ€“12โ€“1 ยท 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility0.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped โ€” moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning4.8
Utility0.9
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact1.4

Composite 2.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.01
Reaction time679ms+63ms
first โ…“ avg 616ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 679ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%+2.1%
first โ…“ avg 11.2% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating ยท 13โ€“8 ยท nuke, 13 Oct โ†’
32%Best headshot accuracy ยท 10โ€“13 ยท inferno, 18 Sept โ†’
406msFastest reaction time ยท 10โ€“13 ยท anubis, 25 Sept โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท nuke, 1 Oct โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6โ€“3In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map ยท 70% over 10officeWeakest map ยท 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC3715โ€“2241%-0.03
officeD113โ€“827%-0.03
vertigoS107โ€“370%-0.02
infernoC94โ€“544%-0.01
poseidonB84โ€“450%-0.04
dust2D72โ€“529%-0.02
trainD62โ€“433%0.01
anubisB63โ€“350%-0.01
mirageA53โ€“260%0.03
overpassโ€”10โ€“10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

41,623Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
2,924Matches
38.7%Match win rate
37.9%Headshot %
3.5%Shot accuracy
4,102MVPs
1,052Hours (in match)
1,608Bombs planted
420Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,089dust2
2,509inferno
1,985nuke
1,602office
722vertigo
364italy
220train
44cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
60.8%Counter-strafing
11.0ยฐPreaim
675msReaction time
49.7%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.13Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
9.91HE damage / grenade
0.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads โ€” usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4483% โ€” below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training โ†’
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1349 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy โ†’Dust 2 grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13โ€“8-0.069%16 Oct โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.0117%16 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0510%16 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.066%16 Oct โ†’
office13โ€“5-0.0122%16 Oct โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.048%16 Oct โ†’
nuke4โ€“130.0113%15 Oct โ†’
train7โ€“130.0517%15 Oct โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0018%15 Oct โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.087%14 Oct โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.017%14 Oct โ†’
train4โ€“13-0.0112%13 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.1314%13 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.034%13 Oct โ†’
office13โ€“7-0.0525%13 Oct โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0510%13 Oct โ†’
dust212โ€“12-0.0416%11 Oct โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0117%10 Oct โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0120%10 Oct โ†’
train3โ€“130.0413%10 Oct โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0212%10 Oct โ†’
office6โ€“13-0.0117%10 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0412%10 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“4-0.0211%10 Oct โ†’
office12โ€“120.016%9 Oct โ†’
office4โ€“130.0421%9 Oct โ†’
nuke3โ€“13-0.0411%9 Oct โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0422%9 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0223%8 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“6-0.008%8 Oct โ†’
train7โ€“13-0.059%8 Oct โ†’
office13โ€“90.0415%8 Oct โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.058%8 Oct โ†’
office6โ€“13-0.079%8 Oct โ†’
dust212โ€“12-0.0610%8 Oct โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0717%8 Oct โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0821%8 Oct โ†’
nuke3โ€“13-0.079%8 Oct โ†’
train13โ€“110.0316%8 Oct โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.0620%8 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.047%7 Oct โ†’
office7โ€“13-0.0828%7 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“2-0.0210%7 Oct โ†’
office4โ€“13-0.0914%5 Oct โ†’
vertigo11โ€“13-0.019%5 Oct โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0115%5 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.1215%5 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“6-0.068%5 Oct โ†’
vertigo11โ€“13-0.018%3 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0310%2 Oct โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.024%2 Oct โ†’
overpass4โ€“13-0.0313%2 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“2-0.0214%1 Oct โ†’
nuke3โ€“13-0.094%1 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“8-0.0921%1 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“1-0.0611%1 Oct โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0829%1 Oct โ†’
office10โ€“13-0.123%1 Oct โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.0817%30 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“9-0.024%25 Sept โ†’
anubis10โ€“130.0112%25 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0721%25 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“8-0.0511%25 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“4-0.0011%25 Sept โ†’
dust210โ€“130.0012%25 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“4-0.020%25 Sept โ†’
poseidon7โ€“9-0.127%25 Sept โ†’
poseidon1โ€“9-0.180%25 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.025%24 Sept โ†’
anubis1โ€“13-0.057%23 Sept โ†’
office12โ€“12-0.0415%23 Sept โ†’
vertigo6โ€“13-0.025%23 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“8-0.076%23 Sept โ†’
train13โ€“70.0313%23 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“30.0315%23 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0313%23 Sept โ†’
dust27โ€“130.0112%23 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0314%22 Sept โ†’
nuke1โ€“13-0.0612%22 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.1212%22 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0912%22 Sept โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.037%21 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“13-0.0114%21 Sept โ†’
poseidon8โ€“80.1220%20 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“5-0.0011%20 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“1-0.015%20 Sept โ†’
poseidon8โ€“80.0113%20 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“3-0.0227%20 Sept โ†’
poseidon9โ€“6-0.110%20 Sept โ†’
inferno6โ€“9-0.2613%20 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“7-0.0014%19 Sept โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0432%18 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“1-0.063%18 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.0111%18 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.1114%18 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.058%18 Sept โ†’
dust212โ€“12-0.0114%18 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“60.077%15 Sept โ†’
nuke10โ€“130.027%15 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0612%15 Sept โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.