CoNa | Niyo

CoNa | Niyo — CS2 Stats

DE76561199215557344[U:1:1255291616]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,217Tracked matches28%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,048Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,143Light Blue band · top ~73.3% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,143 -2,482 12 Aug – 13 Sept · 11 days played
6,1439,366peak 9,36612 Aug13 Sept
9,612Peak Premier in tracked matches
9Days played since 2026-08-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,223 below peak (9,366)
  • -3,223 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,857 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches3——
Win rate0%——
K/D0.45——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate44.8%39.9%41.9%above
Shot accuracy5.8%7.0%9.6%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.920.920.980.06 short
Match win rate42.2%42.3%43.8%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCoNa | NiyoPREMIER6,143 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning41
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–59–1Last 10040%Win rateLLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility3.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.1
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time658ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 6–13 · dust2, 17 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · cache, 19 Aug →
484msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 16 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 13 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L5Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 48% over 31anubisWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3115–1648%-0.01
infernoC208–1240%-0.01
ancientC188–1044%-0.02
anubisD112–918%-0.05
cacheC104–640%-0.01
mirageC52–340%-0.04
nukeD51–420%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,400Lifetime kills
0.92K/D · Top 50% of Light Blue band
2,725Matches
42.2%Match win rate
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band
5.8%Shot accuracy
4,391MVPs
1,048Hours (in match)
3,132Bombs planted
531Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,336
AWP3,095
P2501,813
FAMAS1,665
MP91,622
MAC-101,514

Lifetime map wins

8,788dust2
4,094inferno
2,170nuke
1,231office
594vertigo
473train
5italy
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
30%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
69.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

16%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21030%0.7612.6
Mirage520%0.6912.4
Cache425%0.8315.0
Ancient333%0.6811.7
Inferno20%0.6410.5
Nuke250%1.7110.0
Anubis1100%0.6712.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
653msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
13.36HE damage / grenade
0.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.144% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 0.8407 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.8411% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.088%13 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0617%13 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.126%25 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0438%19 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.057%18 Aug →
inferno13–2-0.0616%18 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0916%18 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0224%18 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0812%18 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0514%18 Aug →
dust217–19-0.0911%18 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0312%18 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0416%18 Aug →
dust210–130.0511%18 Aug →
inferno13–110.0217%18 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0814%18 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0319%18 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.048%18 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0410%18 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0818%18 Aug →
dust24–13-0.046%18 Aug →
inferno9–130.0412%18 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0311%18 Aug →
dust215–15-0.037%18 Aug →
cache13–50.087%18 Aug →
dust26–130.0822%17 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0016%17 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.068%17 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0023%17 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0124%17 Aug →
ancient13–100.0011%17 Aug →
inferno9–130.0610%17 Aug →
dust28–130.0119%17 Aug →
mirage9–130.057%17 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0017%17 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0710%17 Aug →
dust27–130.0321%17 Aug →
inferno10–130.007%17 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0011%17 Aug →
inferno9–130.0022%17 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.055%17 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0412%17 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0623%16 Aug →
dust213–70.0310%16 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.038%16 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.007%16 Aug →
dust213–80.0716%16 Aug →
dust213–80.0015%16 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0413%16 Aug →
dust216–130.0024%16 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0216%16 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0613%16 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.059%16 Aug →
ancient16–140.026%16 Aug →
dust28–13-0.058%16 Aug →
inferno11–130.0112%16 Aug →
ancient6–130.0117%16 Aug →
dust213–11-0.018%16 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0212%16 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0314%16 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0411%16 Aug →
inferno13–80.0819%16 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0211%16 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0610%16 Aug →
dust213–16-0.059%16 Aug →
inferno13–100.025%16 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.097%16 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0415%15 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0415%15 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0311%15 Aug →
dust29–130.0124%15 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0130%15 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.057%15 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0412%15 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.089%15 Aug →
anubis13–70.0217%13 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0310%13 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.034%13 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.018%13 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0214%13 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0514%13 Aug →
dust213–11-0.005%13 Aug →
nuke13–30.0111%13 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.069%13 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0312%13 Aug →
inferno13–00.048%13 Aug →
cache10–13-0.047%13 Aug →
ancient13–100.026%13 Aug →
dust213–80.0123%13 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.057%13 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0516%13 Aug →
ancient13–160.0513%13 Aug →
cache13–40.0112%12 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0710%12 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0210%12 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0411%12 Aug →
dust210–130.0023%12 Aug →
ancient8–0-0.046%12 Aug →
dust213–80.0418%12 Aug →
cache13–60.0518%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.