๐”พ๐•™๐• ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•ช๐•ชใƒƒ

๐”พ๐•™๐• ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•ช๐•ชใƒƒ โ€” CS2 Stats

IM76561199205195833[U:1:1244930105]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

553Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
428Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,412Light Blue band ยท top ~62.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (56 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,412 +4,728 24 Jul โ€“ 2 Sept ยท 17 days played
3,6849,543peak 9,54324 Jul2 Sept
9,784Peak Premier in tracked matches
17Days played since 2026-07-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,131 below peak (9,543)
  • -1,131 over 30 days ยท declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 โ€” 1,588 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate25.7%41.3%41.8%16.1% short
Shot accuracy10.5%12.7%12.2%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio9.110.950.98above
Match win rate41.2%42.6%43.3%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐”พ๐•™๐• ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•ช๐•ชใƒƒFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER8,412 ยท Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning65
Utility34

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD59โ€“37โ€“4Last 10059%Win rateLLLTWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’30pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.04 avg rating ยท +1.4pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’11ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1โ€“3โ€“1 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 3โ€“6โ€“1 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 20

  • 9โ€“10โ€“1 ยท 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility3.4
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 32% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.5
Utility3.4
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.03 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.03
Reaction time626msโˆ’50ms
first โ…“ avg 676ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+2.8%
first โ…“ avg 15.0% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating ยท 13โ€“9 ยท mirage, 31 Jul โ†’
32%Best headshot accuracy ยท 1โ€“13 ยท mirage, 2 Sept โ†’
469msFastest reaction time ยท 9โ€“13 ยท mirage, 4 Aug โ†’
13โ€“2Biggest win ยท nuke, 27 Jul โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10โ€“9In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map ยท 67% over 12anubisWeakest map ยท 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2516โ€“964%0.02
nukeA2113โ€“862%0.04
mirageA1810โ€“856%0.04
infernoS128โ€“467%0.02
ancientA106โ€“460%0.05
anubisC83โ€“538%0.00
cacheB63โ€“350%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

175,591Lifetime kills
9.11K/D ยท Top 1% of Level 2 players
1,205Matches
41.2%Match win rate
25.7%Headshot %
10.5%Shot accuracy
2,577MVPs
428Hours (in match)
780Bombs planted
198Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,505
AWP7,146
MP96,953
MAC-105,175
Negev2,471
Molotov1,583

Lifetime map wins

2,097nuke
1,632inferno
1,028dust2
733vertigo
51train
6militia
1office

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
38%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
40.9ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
10.6ยฐPreaim
626msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
4.98HE damage / grenade
7.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3868 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3208% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy โ†’Anubis grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage1โ€“13-0.0432%2 Sept โ†’
dust28โ€“130.0218%2 Sept โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.076%14 Aug โ†’
cache15โ€“15-0.0216%13 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0229%13 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0523%12 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0311%5 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“14-0.0020%5 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0018%5 Aug โ†’
dust28โ€“13-0.0313%4 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0715%4 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“5-0.0115%4 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“60.1221%4 Aug โ†’
nuke8โ€“130.0815%4 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0719%3 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“130.037%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0023%3 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0515%3 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.1225%3 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0316%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0215%3 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.1524%2 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.028%2 Aug โ†’
ancient8โ€“130.0221%2 Aug โ†’
mirage16โ€“130.0214%2 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.0827%2 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.1417%2 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0110%2 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0118%1 Aug โ†’
mirage12โ€“160.0417%1 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0426%1 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.1014%1 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0119%31 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.1520%31 Jul โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0522%31 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0214%31 Jul โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0310%31 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0831%30 Jul โ†’
dust28โ€“130.0326%30 Jul โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0822%30 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0519%30 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“70.007%30 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0815%30 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0613%30 Jul โ†’
ancient16โ€“140.0522%29 Jul โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0223%29 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.1110%29 Jul โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0622%29 Jul โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0118%29 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0711%29 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.089%29 Jul โ†’
cache1โ€“80.0815%29 Jul โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0615%28 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.037%28 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0114%28 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0612%28 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0120%28 Jul โ†’
nuke15โ€“150.0120%28 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0215%28 Jul โ†’
anubis3โ€“130.0213%28 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.119%28 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0818%28 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0023%27 Jul โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0722%27 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0227%27 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“20.0329%27 Jul โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0316%27 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0219%27 Jul โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0420%27 Jul โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.0512%27 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“60.029%27 Jul โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.067%27 Jul โ†’
cache15โ€“150.0914%27 Jul โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.007%27 Jul โ†’
dust215โ€“15-0.0510%27 Jul โ†’
inferno16โ€“13-0.0615%27 Jul โ†’
nuke11โ€“130.0212%27 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0212%27 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0226%26 Jul โ†’
dust23โ€“130.0521%26 Jul โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0317%26 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0119%26 Jul โ†’
mirage5โ€“130.0314%26 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0319%26 Jul โ†’
dust216โ€“140.0115%26 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.1320%26 Jul โ†’
dust216โ€“140.0415%26 Jul โ†’
ancient14โ€“160.0718%26 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0217%26 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0412%26 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“60.096%25 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0816%25 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.048%25 Jul โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0514%25 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“20.0527%25 Jul โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0514%25 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0410%25 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“20.1013%25 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0124%24 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0713%24 Jul โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.