nov0_27.r

nov0_27.r — CS2 Stats

BA76561199189968327[U:1:1229702599]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

313Tracked matches31%Win rate2024Tracked since
824Hours in CS66Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,764Blue band · top ~45.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1000Premier CS Rating · 12,764 → 11,764

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,764 -147 16 Sept – 3 Oct · 14 days played
10,54512,764peak 12,76416 Sept3 Oct
12,995Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,000 below peak (12,764)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,236 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,051), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate39.5%41.8%42.7%3.2% short
Shot accuracy0.2%12.2%11.3%11.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.280.980.99above
Match win rate47.3%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnov0_27.rFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,764 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning75
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateLLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 366ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 423ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility3.8
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 78% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 78% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning7.5
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.08+0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.08
Reaction time484ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 501ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms
Headshot accuracy14.2%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 10–13 · nuke, 1 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · office, 20 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 2 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2210–1245%0.11
mirageD143–1121%0.04
ancientC135–838%0.05
vertigoA116–555%0.11
dust2D93–633%0.03
cacheA85–363%0.03
nukeA74–357%0.05
infernoD51–420%0.02
boulder—31–233%0.07
train—31–233%0.05
office—31–233%-0.00
italy—21–150%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,514Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
1,348Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
39.5%Headshot %
0.2%Shot accuracy
4,526MVPs
430Hours (in match)
1,709Bombs planted
335Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,402dust2
1,240nuke
1,164inferno
661vertigo
169train
112office
53italy
13lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
0.75Avg K/D
80.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10%0.8815.0
Anubis10%0.507.0
Dust210%0.8814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
43.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
501msReaction time
78.1%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
6.47HE damage / grenade
3.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4208% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4526 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis0–50.000%3 Oct →
vertigo10–130.1115%2 Oct →
ancient13–30.1515%2 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0411%2 Oct →
mirage2–130.0318%2 Oct →
anubis13–110.1815%2 Oct →
nuke13–80.0115%1 Oct →
italy7–13-0.019%1 Oct →
mirage9–130.0919%1 Oct →
nuke10–130.2612%1 Oct →
anubis13–60.1312%1 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0123%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0916%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0815%30 Sept →
ancient5–130.129%30 Sept →
inferno10–130.1014%29 Sept →
vertigo13–90.146%29 Sept →
boulder3–130.0722%29 Sept →
mirage4–130.0325%29 Sept →
anubis13–110.0719%29 Sept →
dust210–130.0410%29 Sept →
nuke9–130.0717%29 Sept →
anubis13–50.2511%29 Sept →
anubis12–120.1111%29 Sept →
dust23–130.0919%29 Sept →
vertigo6–130.1413%29 Sept →
train9–130.0013%29 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0417%29 Sept →
ancient4–130.0116%29 Sept →
cache13–11-0.029%28 Sept →
mirage6–130.1118%28 Sept →
anubis13–100.1614%28 Sept →
anubis9–130.1511%28 Sept →
mirage8–130.0313%28 Sept →
ancient13–20.0611%28 Sept →
ancient10–130.000%27 Sept →
cache0–30.000%27 Sept →
vertigo5–130.1511%27 Sept →
anubis13–40.2411%27 Sept →
vertigo13–60.2217%27 Sept →
ancient13–20.149%26 Sept →
inferno13–100.0525%26 Sept →
dust216–130.0214%26 Sept →
ancient13–160.0513%26 Sept →
cache11–130.1317%26 Sept →
anubis11–130.2513%25 Sept →
cache13–80.0713%25 Sept →
cache13–100.0113%25 Sept →
anubis12–120.1416%25 Sept →
cache13–50.1019%24 Sept →
anubis11–130.0514%24 Sept →
mirage13–50.1514%24 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0013%24 Sept →
boulder11–130.058%24 Sept →
train13–60.1414%24 Sept →
vertigo3–90.038%24 Sept →
mirage4–130.1215%24 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0321%24 Sept →
vertigo13–110.118%24 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.028%24 Sept →
mirage13–70.0311%24 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0112%23 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0819%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.0917%23 Sept →
vertigo13–40.1118%23 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0813%23 Sept →
nuke13–90.029%23 Sept →
mirage1–30.000%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.0220%22 Sept →
anubis13–40.0813%22 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.036%21 Sept →
anubis13–30.1114%21 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0210%21 Sept →
vertigo13–90.159%20 Sept →
boulder13–100.1013%20 Sept →
italy13–20.1525%20 Sept →
train7–130.0110%20 Sept →
office5–3-0.0422%20 Sept →
office4–130.0635%20 Sept →
anubis8–130.099%20 Sept →
ancient2–130.0610%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0213%20 Sept →
office8–13-0.027%20 Sept →
anubis12–120.0812%19 Sept →
mirage13–60.0120%19 Sept →
anubis10–130.0713%19 Sept →
inferno8–80.0113%19 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1027%19 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0610%18 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.089%18 Sept →
cache6–13-0.065%18 Sept →
dust213–80.0122%18 Sept →
ancient10–130.1315%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0216%17 Sept →
anubis13–90.1420%17 Sept →
ancient13–100.0311%17 Sept →
mirage11–130.0510%16 Sept →
inferno8–80.0619%16 Sept →
anubis7–130.0812%16 Sept →
anubis2–130.0415%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.