jantterivy

jantterivy — CS2 Stats

FI76561199187197006[U:1:1226931278]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,492Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,410Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating3,524Grey band · top ~85.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 881 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 27 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,524 +797 28 Aug21 Sept · 19 days played
2,6484,349peak 4,34928 Aug21 Sept
4,349Peak Premier in tracked matches
881Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 881
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 20 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 825 below peak (4,349)
  • +797 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 1,476 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,396), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate44.5%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy1.2%12.2%11.3%10.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.540.980.990.45 short
Match win rate33.3%43.3%43.9%10.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjantterivyFACEITLevel 3 · 881 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER3,524 · Grey bandPEAK ELO881csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning26
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY3664Last 10036%Win rateLWWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 707ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 734ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim3.3
Utility2.4
Positioning2.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning2.6
Utility2.4
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 2.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.07+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.07 → last ⅓ avg -0.07
Reaction time718ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 740ms → last ⅓ avg 718ms
Headshot accuracy10.2%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 10.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 7–13 · nuke, 2 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · dust2, 1 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · mirage, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD2481633%-0.07
ancientB147750%-0.05
dust2C135838%-0.05
anubisD113827%-0.07
infernoC104640%-0.04
mirageD72529%-0.08
cacheS64267%-0.09
train42250%-0.05
overpass31233%-0.04
vertigo2020%-0.08
office2020%-0.12
boulder1010%-0.09
eldorado1010%-0.13
poseidon1010%-0.16
debris1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,287Lifetime kills
0.54K/D
3,170Matches
33.3%Match win rate
44.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
1.2%Shot accuracy
4,505MVPs
1,046Hours (in match)
1,493Bombs planted
282Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,569nuke
3,561dust2
2,015inferno
1,467train
1,221vertigo
283office
173italy
18ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
36%Win rate
0.30Avg K/D
35.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis367%0.235.3
Mirage250%0.335.0
Cache20%0.245.5
Ancient10%0.508.0
Dust210%0.417.0
Nuke1100%0.152.0
Train10%0.397.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.5%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
711msReaction time
18.6%T opening success
16.8%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
3.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.4804% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 710.8312ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4074 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.0717%22 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0111%22 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0811%22 Sept
mirage2–13-0.137%22 Sept
dust213–40.0116%22 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0412%22 Sept
mirage13–9-0.1021%22 Sept
boulder2–5-0.090%21 Sept
anubis10–13-0.037%21 Sept
inferno4–13-0.075%21 Sept
dust210–13-0.1117%21 Sept
nuke4–13-0.049%21 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0113%21 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0514%21 Sept
anubis13–7-0.108%17 Sept
anubis10–13-0.075%16 Sept
dust22–13-0.0816%16 Sept
train13–4-0.034%15 Sept
mirage1–13-0.097%15 Sept
vertigo2–13-0.074%15 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0417%15 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0622%15 Sept
nuke13–11-0.046%15 Sept
dust213–1-0.105%15 Sept
cache13–5-0.1211%15 Sept
overpass10–13-0.094%14 Sept
nuke1–7-0.200%14 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0811%13 Sept
mirage13–7-0.085%13 Sept
train13–60.0111%12 Sept
ancient4–13-0.053%12 Sept
anubis5–13-0.1320%11 Sept
nuke8–7-0.1119%11 Sept
ancient7–13-0.034%10 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0813%10 Sept
train1–13-0.0920%9 Sept
nuke1–13-0.136%9 Sept
nuke6–13-0.060%8 Sept
dust23–13-0.0713%8 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0710%8 Sept
dust29–13-0.0315%7 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0322%7 Sept
cache13–8-0.0516%6 Sept
nuke13–4-0.089%6 Sept
ancient13–70.047%5 Sept
ancient16–12-0.0712%5 Sept
nuke13–100.039%5 Sept
nuke8–13-0.103%5 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0320%5 Sept
inferno5–9-0.026%5 Sept
overpass9–70.0230%5 Sept
nuke9–50.029%5 Sept
nuke9–13-0.1016%4 Sept
eldorado3–9-0.1314%4 Sept
anubis13–11-0.1110%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0315%3 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0816%3 Sept
dust24–13-0.0110%3 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.0910%3 Sept
nuke7–130.139%2 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0214%2 Sept
ancient4–13-0.089%1 Sept
inferno13–80.0313%1 Sept
dust25–13-0.046%1 Sept
dust23–0-0.05100%1 Sept
cache7–13-0.116%1 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0715%1 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0510%1 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0519%1 Sept
ancient2–13-0.080%1 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0617%1 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0111%31 Aug
nuke1–1-0.180%31 Aug
dust213–90.0221%31 Aug
ancient5–13-0.099%31 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0117%30 Aug
dust25–13-0.1019%30 Aug
anubis10–13-0.077%30 Aug
ancient13–1-0.039%30 Aug
nuke13–16-0.120%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.134%29 Aug
cache9–13-0.0910%29 Aug
train9–13-0.085%29 Aug
cache13–10-0.0917%29 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0216%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0613%28 Aug
anubis13–10.0116%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.050%28 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.1633%28 Aug
nuke5–9-0.120%28 Aug
nuke9–13-0.1013%28 Aug
cache13–8-0.0516%28 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0811%28 Aug
office6–13-0.1112%28 Aug
anubis4–13-0.083%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.066%28 Aug
overpass6–9-0.0533%27 Aug
debris4–9-0.0315%27 Aug
office2–13-0.146%27 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0667%27 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →