PigeonPL7

PigeonPL7 — CS2 Stats

US76561199153561897[U:1:1193296169]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,004Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since
934Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,302Purple band · top ~19.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+360Premier CS Rating · 16,942 → 17,302

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,302 -71 17 Sept – 7 Nov · 28 days played
15,33617,737peak 17,73717 Sept7 Nov
18,048Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 435 below peak (17,737)
  • +565 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,698 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.4%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.021.030.09 short
Match win rate47.3%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPigeonPL7FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,302 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning63
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–47Last 10053%Win rateWLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch5.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.3
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time576ms+42ms
first ⅓ avg 533ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+7.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 24 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 24 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 85% over 13anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2211–1150%0.00
mirageD175–1229%0.00
ancientA1610–663%0.02
nukeS1311–285%0.03
cacheA116–555%0.01
anubisD113–827%-0.01
infernoS75–271%0.03
overpass—21–150%-0.00
vertigo—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,419Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
1,577Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,089MVPs
506Hours (in match)
1,580Bombs planted
775Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,050dust2
2,345nuke
1,412inferno
528vertigo
181train
164office
64italy
4lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches
49%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
74.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2148%1.0714.1
Dust21844%0.9612.4
Nuke1346%1.1117.2
Inferno956%1.5314.0
Anubis862%1.0413.1
Ancient838%0.8311.5
Cache2100%0.9016.0
Vertigo10%0.478.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
581msReaction time
58.8%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
11.99HE damage / grenade
4.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3819 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.8459% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–120.0318%7 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0018%5 Nov →
dust21–13-0.0721%5 Nov →
cache9–130.1130%4 Nov →
overpass1–13-0.1018%2 Nov →
ancient8–40.0319%31 Oct →
ancient13–100.0313%31 Oct →
cache9–130.0016%31 Oct →
dust210–5-0.0232%31 Oct →
nuke13–30.1423%31 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0114%30 Oct →
dust213–100.0229%29 Oct →
nuke13–60.0224%29 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0419%28 Oct →
cache11–130.0114%27 Oct →
nuke13–40.0316%27 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0823%27 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0116%25 Oct →
dust213–60.0225%24 Oct →
nuke13–90.0832%24 Oct →
anubis13–60.0331%24 Oct →
inferno9–30.0418%24 Oct →
dust213–50.2033%24 Oct →
anubis6–130.0527%24 Oct →
dust213–40.0620%23 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0020%23 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0324%23 Oct →
nuke13–40.0219%22 Oct →
ancient13–90.0524%22 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0316%22 Oct →
mirage11–130.0516%22 Oct →
overpass13–70.1017%22 Oct →
dust211–130.0431%22 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0319%22 Oct →
ancient7–130.0315%22 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0522%22 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0219%20 Oct →
ancient13–60.0821%20 Oct →
mirage13–110.0711%20 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0010%20 Oct →
dust213–20.0111%20 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0211%19 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0822%16 Oct →
cache13–20.1018%16 Oct →
ancient13–40.0813%16 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0521%15 Oct →
anubis6–20.005%15 Oct →
inferno10–130.0022%15 Oct →
cache13–70.0530%15 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0611%12 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0017%12 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0413%10 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0011%10 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0319%10 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0414%10 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0418%9 Oct →
mirage11–130.048%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0116%8 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0215%8 Oct →
mirage11–130.0512%8 Oct →
anubis14–160.0317%8 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0020%6 Oct →
cache3–13-0.1413%5 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0120%4 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0114%4 Oct →
ancient13–40.0516%4 Oct →
nuke13–110.0210%4 Oct →
mirage13–90.0415%4 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0513%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0517%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.000%3 Oct →
mirage13–70.0324%2 Oct →
inferno9–60.0713%2 Oct →
dust216–12-0.028%29 Sept →
mirage13–80.0217%29 Sept →
inferno9–20.1619%28 Sept →
mirage5–130.039%28 Sept →
cache13–60.0512%25 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0311%24 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0513%24 Sept →
ancient13–50.018%24 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0313%23 Sept →
nuke0–4-0.0314%20 Sept →
mirage10–130.0512%20 Sept →
nuke13–70.1717%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0819%20 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0220%20 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0112%20 Sept →
dust213–90.0510%19 Sept →
dust213–10.0420%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.039%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0718%19 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0716%19 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.1013%18 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0214%18 Sept →
nuke13–40.0223%18 Sept →
dust213–90.0310%18 Sept →
ancient16–120.0412%18 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0113%18 Sept →
ancient9–130.0415%17 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.