! Zivkovich

! Zivkovich — CS2 Stats

RS76561199151604052[U:1:1191338324]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,163Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,748Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating30,000Top 1% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#784 of 261564 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,163 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 30,000 +8,643 3 Aug – 15 Oct · 26 days played
21,35730,110peak 30,1103 Aug15 Oct
30,110Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,104Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-03-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 110 below peak (30,110)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Gold band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 15 Oct 2026 and 14 Nov 2026.

Measured 15 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 12 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate49.6%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy12.1%12.0%12.4%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.021.030.04 short
Match win rate41.9%44.7%45.2%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG! ZivkovichFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER30,000 · Gold bandPEAK ELO1,104csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning57
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWWLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 435ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility2.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch0.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning5.7
Utility2.8
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.08−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.09 → last ⅓ avg 0.08
Reaction time420ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 477ms → last ⅓ avg 420ms
Headshot accuracy28.0%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 27 Aug →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · inferno, 11 Oct →
125msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 19 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 32anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3518–1751%0.05
infernoA3218–1456%0.06
dust2B168–850%0.06
anubisD93–633%0.08
cache—43–175%0.19
nuke—33–0100%0.13
vertigo—11–0100%0.30

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,804Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,608Matches
41.9%Match win rate
49.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
12.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12,430MVPs
1,748Hours (in match)
3,554Bombs planted
989Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,960
AWP15,706
SSG 083,738
Knife2,743
P250836

Lifetime map wins

5,914inferno
2,900dust2
1,385vertigo
1,157nuke
482train
235office
90lake
45ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
105.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1060%1.6418.1
Dust2743%1.1519.1
Ancient250%1.3620.0
Nuke2100%1.1219.0
Inferno10%0.7814.0
Anubis10%2.4036.0
Overpass1100%3.0033.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.4%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
5.5°Preaim
372msReaction time
55.5%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
14.90HE damage / grenade
1.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3197 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–30.2767%11 Oct →
mirage12–40.077%15 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0425%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0223%13 Sept →
inferno9–1-0.0025%12 Sept →
mirage8–130.0933%12 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.029%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.2328%2 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0435%31 Aug →
nuke9–20.1512%31 Aug →
nuke9–50.0431%31 Aug →
inferno9–30.2732%30 Aug →
anubis6–130.0536%30 Aug →
inferno9–40.0412%28 Aug →
mirage4–20.0222%28 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0242%28 Aug →
dust28–130.1435%27 Aug →
mirage12–120.1025%27 Aug →
vertigo9–30.306%27 Aug →
inferno9–50.1414%27 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.1114%24 Aug →
inferno9–30.0417%24 Aug →
cache13–10.098%24 Aug →
mirage4–130.0037%24 Aug →
mirage13–70.2139%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.1834%23 Aug →
inferno8–80.1117%23 Aug →
nuke13–100.1930%23 Aug →
mirage6–130.0437%23 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0836%23 Aug →
mirage5–130.0964%21 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0529%21 Aug →
dust22–130.0643%21 Aug →
inferno9–50.0650%21 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0363%21 Aug →
inferno6–90.0616%19 Aug →
mirage7–130.1138%19 Aug →
dust216–120.1927%19 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1733%19 Aug →
inferno5–90.0343%19 Aug →
inferno8–80.1416%19 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0455%19 Aug →
inferno9–70.1213%19 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0515%18 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0320%18 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0535%18 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0838%18 Aug →
dust23–130.0760%18 Aug →
dust24–130.0631%18 Aug →
mirage1–7-0.0714%18 Aug →
mirage0–130.1050%16 Aug →
cache4–130.1740%16 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.1215%16 Aug →
inferno9–20.0311%16 Aug →
inferno9–40.1055%16 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0331%16 Aug →
inferno9–70.1346%16 Aug →
inferno8–80.1246%16 Aug →
inferno9–70.1342%16 Aug →
dust213–90.1026%15 Aug →
inferno9–4-0.0067%15 Aug →
inferno9–60.2021%15 Aug →
inferno9–30.0539%15 Aug →
dust210–60.0031%15 Aug →
mirage9–130.0118%15 Aug →
mirage13–100.0624%15 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0038%15 Aug →
inferno9–70.0243%15 Aug →
inferno9–60.1327%15 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0330%13 Aug →
anubis16–120.1425%13 Aug →
mirage10–130.0319%12 Aug →
anubis4–130.0527%12 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0231%12 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0729%11 Aug →
mirage9–130.2236%11 Aug →
anubis13–50.1821%5 Aug →
anubis13–110.0917%5 Aug →
mirage13–110.1123%5 Aug →
dust213–90.1133%5 Aug →
mirage16–120.1019%5 Aug →
anubis11–130.0421%4 Aug →
dust213–70.0520%4 Aug →
cache13–50.2428%4 Aug →
dust213–110.1311%4 Aug →
inferno9–130.096%4 Aug →
mirage13–70.098%4 Aug →
mirage13–40.0621%4 Aug →
dust213–80.0726%4 Aug →
mirage13–60.0517%4 Aug →
anubis6–130.095%4 Aug →
mirage13–30.2020%4 Aug →
mirage13–20.0431%3 Aug →
mirage9–130.0944%3 Aug →
inferno4–130.0242%3 Aug →
inferno13–50.0724%3 Aug →
dust213–110.0815%3 Aug →
dust212–160.1116%3 Aug →
anubis9–130.0929%3 Aug →
cache13–40.2542%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.