lana kocham cie

lana kocham cie — CS2 Stats

PL76561199145255804[U:1:1184990076]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,102Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,232Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,268Blue band · top ~32.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,268 +740 6 Sept – 12 Nov · 29 days played
11,83316,659peak 16,6596 Sept12 Nov
16,659Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,036Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,391 below peak (16,659)
  • -369 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 732 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,631), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate38.6%43.8%44.8%6.1% short
Shot accuracy11.9%12.0%12.4%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.021.030.05 short
Match win rate45.5%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlana kocham cieFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,268 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,036csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 99% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time543ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 28 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 10 Sept →
352msFastest reaction time · 11–1 · mirage, 12 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 16 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA4427–1761%-0.00
infernoD165–1131%-0.02
dust2C156–940%-0.02
anubisB84–450%-0.02
nukeA85–363%-0.02
cache—43–175%-0.02
ancient—41–325%-0.03
rush_001—11–0100%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,592Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
3,535Matches
45.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
38.6%Headshot %
11.9%Shot accuracy
7,722MVPs
1,049Hours (in match)
2,782Bombs planted
901Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,772nuke
2,549lake
2,316inferno
1,927dust2
1,825vertigo
355train
89cbble
48safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

230Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
76.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9345%1.0814.8
Anubis3250%0.9614.9
Vertigo2756%1.2016.6
Nuke2467%1.0715.0
Dust21953%0.9414.0
Ancient1560%0.9313.6
Inferno757%1.0416.6
Overpass560%1.6118.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
538msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
10.56HE damage / grenade
3.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.5333 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6349% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–5-0.0327%13 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0418%12 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0312%12 Nov →
mirage16–12-0.0917%12 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0415%12 Nov →
cache13–2-0.0315%5 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0323%5 Nov →
cache13–90.0424%2 Nov →
mirage13–40.0226%2 Nov →
mirage8–130.0328%2 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0823%1 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0117%29 Oct →
inferno9–30.0119%28 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0010%28 Oct →
dust213–80.1211%28 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.1810%28 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.097%28 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0842%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0014%27 Oct →
inferno16–130.1120%25 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0213%25 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0624%21 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0419%18 Oct →
mirage12–120.0952%17 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.078%16 Oct →
dust24–10-0.0031%16 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.088%16 Oct →
inferno13–00.0436%16 Oct →
anubis11–130.0429%16 Oct →
nuke13–20.0316%14 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0657%14 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0232%14 Oct →
inferno15–150.0727%14 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0617%13 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0625%13 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0122%11 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0212%9 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0714%9 Oct →
mirage13–80.1026%7 Oct →
mirage15–150.0218%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0538%3 Oct →
mirage13–80.0912%3 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0225%3 Oct →
mirage5–130.0120%2 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0536%2 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0312%1 Oct →
inferno7–130.0439%1 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0321%30 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0133%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0511%30 Sept →
mirage13–70.0615%30 Sept →
rush_0016–2-0.0911%30 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0531%30 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.057%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.0233%29 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0719%27 Sept →
mirage13–30.1033%27 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.0119%26 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0522%24 Sept →
mirage3–130.0125%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0527%20 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0421%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0419%19 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0215%18 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0321%17 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0233%17 Sept →
mirage13–60.0522%17 Sept →
mirage6–0-0.0521%17 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.036%16 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0220%16 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.048%16 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0315%15 Sept →
dust210–13-0.077%14 Sept →
nuke16–140.0213%14 Sept →
inferno15–150.0018%14 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0424%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0811%13 Sept →
mirage13–60.0816%13 Sept →
inferno8–130.0519%13 Sept →
dust213–4-0.067%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0614%13 Sept →
dust28–130.0620%13 Sept →
mirage11–10.0325%12 Sept →
nuke13–70.0710%12 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0042%12 Sept →
mirage8–130.0422%12 Sept →
dust211–13-0.066%12 Sept →
mirage2–130.09100%10 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0523%10 Sept →
anubis13–40.0411%10 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0318%10 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.1219%10 Sept →
dust27–13-0.056%8 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.087%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0613%8 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0513%7 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0512%7 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0016%7 Sept →
nuke13–90.0214%6 Sept →
mirage2–10-0.0027%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.