TRUMPASTIS

TRUMPASTIS — CS2 Stats

CK76561199141849186[U:1:1181583458]Steam profile ↗community banned

448Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,010Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating11,506Blue band · top ~46.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,506 -2,937 26 May – 29 Oct · 34 days played
11,24514,443peak 14,44326 May29 Oct
14,443Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2026-05-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,937 below peak (14,443)
  • -1,671 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,091 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,494 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate52.1%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy10.9%12.2%11.2%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.110.980.99above
Match win rate44.1%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTRUMPASTISFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,506 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning56
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateLWLWTWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time608ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 13 Jul →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 28 Aug →
313msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · nuke, 25 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2814–1450%0.00
dust2C207–1335%0.02
mirageB179–853%0.02
anubisD103–730%-0.01
cacheD103–730%0.02
ancientC83–538%-0.01
nukeS64–267%0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,679Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
1,490Matches
44.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
52.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
10.9%Shot accuracy
3,857MVPs
465Hours (in match)
1,731Bombs planted
323Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,977inferno
2,700dust2
800nuke
457vertigo
197train
66cbble
59office
26safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

46Matches
48%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
90.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%0.9415.5
Inferno2100%1.9022.0
Anubis20%1.1424.5
Overpass1100%1.8830.0
Mirage10%0.574.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
621msReaction time
57.0%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
12.70HE damage / grenade
4.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0013%29 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0516%28 Oct →
cache9–130.0211%26 Oct →
mirage13–50.0512%26 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0115%24 Oct →
dust213–90.0115%22 Oct →
anubis4–130.0420%21 Oct →
anubis13–60.0224%21 Oct →
inferno13–00.0217%20 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0117%20 Oct →
mirage11–130.0018%20 Oct →
anubis11–130.0415%20 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0716%20 Oct →
mirage8–130.0415%20 Oct →
inferno13–100.0915%19 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0114%17 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0630%16 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0224%14 Oct →
inferno8–80.0215%14 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0121%14 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.019%14 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0133%13 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0214%13 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0217%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.0013%12 Oct →
inferno13–30.0723%12 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0124%6 Oct →
dust23–130.0022%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0628%5 Oct →
inferno9–50.0719%4 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0116%28 Sept →
dust23–130.0728%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.0423%9 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0113%4 Sept →
mirage13–90.0415%4 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0329%3 Sept →
cache13–60.0927%2 Sept →
dust210–130.0527%1 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0141%28 Aug →
ancient10–130.0223%25 Aug →
nuke9–4-0.1116%25 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.1033%25 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1914%25 Aug →
cache13–70.0629%25 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0321%25 Aug →
inferno9–60.0831%25 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0516%19 Aug →
mirage10–130.0114%18 Aug →
dust26–130.0216%18 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.026%18 Aug →
mirage13–10.1316%18 Aug →
inferno8–130.0414%17 Aug →
dust213–90.0716%17 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.1030%17 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0613%17 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0712%16 Aug →
nuke9–50.1333%5 Aug →
inferno6–90.1217%5 Aug →
mirage13–100.0116%5 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0110%5 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0110%4 Aug →
inferno9–70.0823%3 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.0929%3 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0319%31 Jul →
dust25–130.0324%22 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0112%22 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0218%22 Jul →
dust24–00.1717%21 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0221%21 Jul →
mirage13–80.0114%21 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0510%20 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0113%20 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0023%20 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0117%20 Jul →
dust213–110.0119%20 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0323%17 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0319%17 Jul →
nuke13–20.0827%16 Jul →
cache7–13-0.004%16 Jul →
inferno9–60.0321%16 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0317%13 Jul →
inferno9–40.2429%13 Jul →
nuke9–50.1019%13 Jul →
mirage13–40.1424%13 Jul →
cache13–70.1321%12 Jul →
mirage7–130.0611%25 Jun →
dust213–100.1720%24 Jun →
mirage13–80.0021%10 Jun →
mirage9–130.0214%4 Jun →
ancient13–20.0818%4 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0210%4 Jun →
inferno13–80.0113%2 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.1017%2 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0414%1 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.0133%1 Jun →
ancient7–130.0018%1 Jun →
overpass13–10.0613%1 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.0527%27 May →
inferno8–13-0.0013%27 May →
mirage5–13-0.0937%26 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.