Iivo The Box Eater

Iivo The Box Eater — CS2 Stats

76561199131308930[U:1:1171043202]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

567Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,064Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating18,584Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,584 +5,498 23 Dec – 11 Oct · 18 days played
12,51720,104peak 20,10423 Dec11 Oct
20,104Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-12-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,520 below peak (20,104)
  • -1,415 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,773 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,416 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate60.8%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy13.7%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.021.03above
Match win rate43.6%44.7%45.2%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIivo The Box EaterFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,584 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning56
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLLLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch6.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 54% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time485ms−92ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 485ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−5.8%
first ⅓ avg 27.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · vertigo, 4 Oct →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · inferno, 28 Dec →
305msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 20 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2815–1354%0.04
infernoC187–1139%0.04
nukeB178–947%0.03
ancientA116–555%0.00
dust2A95–456%-0.01
cacheA53–260%0.07
anubisD51–420%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.04
eldorado—10–10%-0.14
debris—11–0100%0.13
poseidon—10–10%-0.12
office—10–10%0.02
train—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,731Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,557Matches
43.6%Match win rate
60.8%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,073MVPs
1,437Hours (in match)
2,066Bombs planted
1,961Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,765inferno
3,557nuke
2,407vertigo
1,687dust2
1,525train
79office
65cbble
63lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

128Matches
54%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.1ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2055%1.1516.2
Anubis1450%1.0414.7
Ancient838%1.2918.6
Inferno520%1.2118.2
Nuke475%1.5220.3
Dust2333%1.1512.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
471msReaction time
54.5%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.08HE damage / grenade
7.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.9295% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–130.1127%18 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0214%11 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0929%11 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0226%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.0223%10 Oct →
ancient5–130.0217%9 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0228%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.0922%9 Oct →
mirage4–130.0020%9 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0511%9 Oct →
eldorado4–9-0.1414%9 Oct →
debris9–40.1332%9 Oct →
poseidon2–9-0.1214%9 Oct →
inferno4–130.1117%4 Oct →
vertigo13–40.2023%4 Oct →
mirage13–40.1919%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.1519%2 Oct →
cache7–130.0621%2 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0424%27 Sept →
mirage9–130.0221%27 Sept →
nuke13–40.0539%20 Sept →
mirage13–100.0821%30 Aug →
ancient13–20.0231%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.1624%30 Aug →
mirage13–30.0825%30 Aug →
inferno8–130.0530%23 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0410%20 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0813%20 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0613%20 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0915%20 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0525%16 Aug →
inferno13–10.0433%16 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0320%16 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0122%15 Aug →
inferno13–80.0628%15 Aug →
dust213–60.0122%15 Aug →
mirage9–130.0238%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0525%15 Aug →
mirage13–50.0523%15 Aug →
inferno15–150.0321%15 Aug →
ancient13–110.0220%14 Aug →
dust213–90.0519%13 Aug →
cache13–60.0230%13 Aug →
mirage13–40.0721%11 Aug →
nuke11–130.0624%9 Aug →
cache13–80.0730%7 Aug →
inferno6–130.0123%3 Aug →
office9–130.0217%3 Aug →
mirage13–60.0317%2 Aug →
cache13–100.0824%2 Aug →
inferno6–130.0219%26 Jul →
mirage10–130.0323%25 Jul →
anubis13–60.0118%5 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0019%5 Jul →
vertigo2–9-0.1250%3 Jul →
inferno4–130.0737%3 Jul →
inferno9–20.0814%3 Jul →
inferno9–70.0427%3 Jul →
nuke8–8-0.0516%3 Jul →
mirage13–100.0223%2 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0223%24 Jun →
nuke13–90.0815%24 Jun →
mirage10–130.0114%23 Jun →
nuke8–130.0530%23 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0026%23 Jun →
inferno11–130.0525%23 Jun →
mirage13–90.0217%23 Jun →
nuke13–3-0.0336%22 Jun →
dust213–30.0925%22 Jun →
anubis13–16-0.0426%17 Jun →
anubis7–130.0419%17 May →
nuke11–13-0.0228%19 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0326%12 Apr →
inferno10–130.0320%6 Apr →
nuke13–50.0826%5 Apr →
mirage12–160.0934%5 Apr →
inferno4–130.0535%5 Apr →
mirage13–100.0417%4 Apr →
nuke13–80.0937%4 Apr →
mirage7–130.1633%4 Apr →
nuke11–130.0726%8 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0025%21 Feb →
inferno1–130.0453%28 Dec →
ancient15–150.0125%27 Dec →
dust23–13-0.0931%27 Dec →
mirage13–30.0427%27 Dec →
mirage8–130.0225%27 Dec →
ancient13–50.0423%27 Dec →
mirage13–100.0826%27 Dec →
dust213–20.0432%27 Dec →
nuke10–130.0231%27 Dec →
ancient16–14-0.0122%26 Dec →
dust24–13-0.0339%26 Dec →
nuke10–130.0129%25 Dec →
ancient11–13-0.0216%25 Dec →
mirage13–90.0716%25 Dec →
train9–130.0220%23 Dec →
mirage8–130.0030%23 Dec →
ancient11–13-0.0618%23 Dec →
nuke13–20.0938%23 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.