KP

KP — CS2 Stats

IE76561199129861060[U:1:1169595332]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,257Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,306Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22836 of 258815 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,401 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +739 1 Aug – 25 Oct · 24 days played
22,22524,999peak 24,9991 Aug25 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,401 +0 1 Sept – 4 Oct · 5 observations
1,4011,401peak 1,4011 Sept4 Oct
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,401Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,401
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 130 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,999
  • +1,021 over 30 days · improving
  • +739 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches1741−24
Win rate59%56%+3pp
K/D1.201.02+0.18
Headshot %50%57%−7pp

Measured 4 Oct 2026 → 30 Oct 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 4 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate59.7%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy2.3%13.0%13.2%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.341.061.07above
Match win rate47.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKPFACEITLevel 8 · 1,401 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,401csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning68
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility2.4
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning6.8
Utility2.4
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time540ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 28 Aug →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 15 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 28 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC219–1243%-0.00
ancientA2112–957%0.01
dust2A2011–955%-0.02
cacheS1711–665%0.02
anubisD93–633%0.00
nukeB63–350%0.01
infernoS65–183%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,880Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
1,763Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
59.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
2.3%Shot accuracy
4,097MVPs
666Hours (in match)
1,502Bombs planted
357Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,200dust2
1,907inferno
1,738nuke
720vertigo
363train
81office
63cbble
54lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches
59%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
85.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2446%1.2316.9
Ancient2374%1.1618.5
Anubis1547%0.9513.9
Nuke862%1.3018.0
Overpass875%1.4017.3
Inferno650%1.1318.2
Dust2560%1.2815.2
Cache4100%1.1719.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
42.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
90.9%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
543msReaction time
68.3%T opening success
57.8%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
6.14HE damage / grenade
1.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4102 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–00.1019%25 Oct →
ancient13–60.0311%20 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0027%20 Oct →
nuke16–130.1421%20 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0122%20 Oct →
cache13–10-0.016%18 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.093%11 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0329%11 Oct →
dust213–60.0511%11 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0329%11 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0431%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.0130%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0125%7 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0123%7 Oct →
dust213–50.0224%7 Oct →
mirage11–130.0222%2 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0536%27 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0612%27 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0212%27 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0320%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0247%21 Sept →
ancient13–20.0228%20 Sept →
cache13–30.0547%20 Sept →
mirage13–50.0217%20 Sept →
inferno13–90.0617%20 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0537%17 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0314%16 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0820%13 Sept →
ancient5–130.0328%13 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0824%13 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0122%13 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0829%13 Sept →
ancient13–90.0627%13 Sept →
ancient13–10.1015%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0123%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.0025%10 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0320%10 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0233%10 Sept →
dust22–0-0.080%10 Sept →
anubis13–80.0523%8 Sept →
inferno13–110.0344%8 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0132%6 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0534%6 Sept →
anubis8–130.0330%6 Sept →
cache13–40.1238%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0931%6 Sept →
cache10–130.0121%5 Sept →
dust213–110.0517%4 Sept →
nuke13–40.0438%4 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.1014%3 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0131%3 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1027%3 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0031%28 Aug →
mirage13–30.1536%28 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0335%28 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0027%28 Aug →
cache14–160.0022%27 Aug →
cache11–130.0418%24 Aug →
cache13–90.0224%24 Aug →
ancient13–110.1025%24 Aug →
mirage8–130.0029%24 Aug →
dust210–2-0.0212%24 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0031%21 Aug →
ancient13–40.0531%21 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0438%21 Aug →
cache13–70.0724%21 Aug →
cache6–130.0031%21 Aug →
ancient13–60.0720%17 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0125%16 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0621%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0615%15 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0050%15 Aug →
inferno13–50.1162%15 Aug →
cache13–80.0124%15 Aug →
dust26–130.0139%15 Aug →
mirage7–130.0522%13 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0317%13 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0820%10 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0940%9 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0127%9 Aug →
ancient13–80.016%9 Aug →
dust213–80.0530%9 Aug →
anubis11–130.0116%8 Aug →
ancient4–130.0018%8 Aug →
dust216–140.0120%8 Aug →
ancient13–70.0314%6 Aug →
anubis13–80.0428%6 Aug →
cache13–110.0124%6 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0410%6 Aug →
anubis10–130.0416%4 Aug →
cache16–140.0428%4 Aug →
dust25–130.0220%4 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0117%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0220%1 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0132%1 Aug →
mirage1–40.0227%1 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0122%1 Aug →
cache13–110.1227%1 Aug →
ancient13–90.0116%1 Aug →
ancient13–50.0420%1 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.