L𝔬n𝔢✞S𝔲rv𝔦v𝔬r — CS2 Stats

US76561198167818501[U:1:207552773]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,711Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

7,820Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport

Premier CS Rating26,811Top 5% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7351 of 258825 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,793 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,811 -2,089 2 Sept – 29 Oct · 17 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,793 +0 2 Sept – 24 Oct · 3 observations

28,900Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,793Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

16Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,793
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 208 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

2,089 below peak (28,900)
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,189 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-02
Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	55	—	—
Win rate	45%	—	—
K/D	1.35	—	—
Headshot %	41%	—	—

Measured 24 Oct 2026 → 30 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	39.0%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	13.5%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.17	1.09
Match win rate	49.3%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning69

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWLLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9

Utility7.0

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning6.9

Utility7.0

Mechanics8.8

Opening Duels7.0

Win Impact2.8

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time540ms+29ms

first ⅓ avg 511ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy18.3%+1.5%

first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 4–0 · rush_001, 14 Oct →

32%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 25 Oct →

344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 11 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	20	11–9	55%	0.03
mirage	C	15	6–9	40%	0.02
dust2	S	14	10–4	71%	0.03
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	0.02
nuke	D	12	4–8	33%	0.04
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.05
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	0.08
rush_001	A	5	3–2	60%	0.02
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

370,876Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

18,090Matches

49.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

39.0%Headshot %

13.5%Shot accuracy

49,205MVPs

7,820Hours (in match)

27,282Bombs planted

5,723Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47118,256

M4A4 / M4A1-S62,130

AWP57,215

Desert Eagle25,520

P2000 / USP-S15,675

Glock-1814,967

FAMAS7,203

SSG 087,119

Galil AR6,697

MAC-105,918

Lifetime map wins

60,014dust2

13,981inferno

7,814nuke

5,960train

3,775vertigo

1,701office

844cbble

230italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

183Matches

66%Win rate

1.80Avg K/D

84.8ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	25	76%	1.39	18.6
Anubis	17	65%	1.71	16.4
Inferno	16	75%	1.54	16.4
Nuke	16	81%	1.51	16.3
Mirage	10	90%	1.57	19.7
Dust2	9	56%	1.39	16.2
Overpass	7	86%	1.40	16.4
Vertigo	3	67%	1.20	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy

41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.3%Spray accuracy

89.7%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

542msReaction time

68.0%T opening success

47.6%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

10.9%Flash assists

6.61HE damage / grenade

12.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	16–14	0.09	20%	29 Oct →
mirage	3–13	0.01	24%	29 Oct →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	20%	29 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	14%	26 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.10	27%	26 Oct →
nuke	8–13	0.08	18%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.03	18%	26 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.03	13%	26 Oct →
inferno	8–13	0.02	24%	26 Oct →
inferno	0–13	-0.01	28%	25 Oct →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	18%	25 Oct →
cache	13–5	-0.00	14%	25 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.06	12%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.11	31%	25 Oct →
dust2	6–13	0.05	16%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.03	25%	25 Oct →
nuke	16–14	0.02	11%	25 Oct →
anubis	5–13	0.00	22%	25 Oct →
inferno	8–13	0.03	8%	25 Oct →
rush_001	0–4	-0.21	17%	25 Oct →
cache	1–13	0.02	32%	25 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	9%	25 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.06	18%	25 Oct →
nuke	7–13	0.08	21%	25 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.05	21%	25 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	14%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.09	27%	24 Oct →
nuke	16–13	0.07	19%	24 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.13	19%	24 Oct →
anubis	5–13	0.03	11%	24 Oct →
cache	13–8	-0.03	10%	24 Oct →
nuke	10–13	0.02	18%	24 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.02	7%	24 Oct →
nuke	14–16	0.09	19%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.04	13%	24 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	28%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	15%	24 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	14%	23 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.02	12%	23 Oct →
cache	3–13	0.08	22%	23 Oct →
cache	13–2	0.10	20%	23 Oct →
rush_001	8–5	0.20	30%	21 Oct →
inferno	7–13	0.07	14%	20 Oct →
ancient	5–13	0.02	12%	20 Oct →
nuke	3–13	0.02	0%	19 Oct →
mirage	3–13	0.04	13%	19 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	13%	18 Oct →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	21%	18 Oct →
anubis	16–14	0.12	18%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.07	19%	18 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.03	18%	18 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.01	19%	18 Oct →
anubis	13–8	0.09	8%	18 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.12	20%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.09	15%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	15%	18 Oct →
rush_001	1–5	-0.08	20%	18 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.01	15%	17 Oct →
cache	11–13	0.04	14%	17 Oct →
mirage	15–15	0.01	24%	17 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	17%	17 Oct →
cache	2–13	0.02	13%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–0	0.10	29%	17 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.06	16%	17 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	20%	15 Oct →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	17%	15 Oct →
anubis	4–13	0.08	16%	15 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.20	24%	14 Oct →
rush_001	4–0	0.27	15%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–3	-0.02	6%	13 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.02	15%	13 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	4%	13 Oct →
cache	15–15	0.06	19%	13 Oct →
rush_001	8–6	-0.07	20%	13 Oct →
inferno	5–13	0.00	15%	11 Oct →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	17%	11 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.09	31%	11 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	22%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.02	25%	11 Oct →
inferno	13–5	0.13	21%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	13%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.06	26%	11 Oct →
mirage	6–13	0.02	13%	11 Oct →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	15%	11 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.06	8%	11 Oct →
ancient	13–4	0.13	22%	11 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.01	12%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.03	7%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–2	0.18	24%	11 Oct →
cache	8–13	0.05	14%	10 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.02	20%	10 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.03	10%	10 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.00	18%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.12	18%	10 Oct →
ancient	6–13	0.03	16%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.01	17%	9 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.02	11%	9 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.03	16%	9 Oct →
anubis	13–4	0.15	23%	9 Oct →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	17%	9 Oct →