Zuna-

Zuna- — CS2 Stats

SM76561199117396600[U:1:1157130872]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,266Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,441Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,984Purple band · top ~16.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,364 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Nov 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,984 -2,016 16 Aug – 6 Nov · 16 days played
17,98420,206peak 20,20616 Aug6 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,364 +0 6 Sept – 2 Nov · 2 observations
1,3641,364peak 1,3646 Sept2 Nov
20,366Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,364Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,364
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 167 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,222 below peak (20,206)
  • -979 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,016 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,016 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate46.0%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy7.4%12.4%12.7%5.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.031.05meets
Match win rate43.2%45.2%45.7%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZuna-FACEITLevel 6 · 1,364 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,984 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,364csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning64
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–47–8Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility3.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.4
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time565ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–6 · debris, 24 Sept →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 14 Oct →
336msFastest reaction time · 6–0 · debris, 24 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L7Current streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 35anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
debrisB3617–1947%0.03
infernoA3520–1557%0.01
anubisD71–614%-0.02
dust2D51–420%-0.01
nuke—41–325%-0.04
ancient—41–325%-0.03
vertigo—31–233%-0.05
mirage—21–150%0.07
cache—22–0100%0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.11
poseidon—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,001Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
3,361Matches
43.2%Match win rate
46.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
7.4%Shot accuracy
10,458MVPs
841Hours (in match)
2,779Bombs planted
545Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,025
AWP4,478
MP91,437
FAMAS1,386
MAC-101,227

Lifetime map wins

3,382inferno
1,953vertigo
1,704nuke
1,570lake
1,226dust2
397train
299office
103cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

210Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
81.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3444%1.1717.2
Nuke3057%1.2618.8
Mirage2756%1.0615.9
Ancient2759%1.1216.9
Dust22544%0.9416.3
Inferno2450%0.9814.5
Overpass1856%1.0815.7
Cache944%1.0117.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
565msReaction time
57.5%T opening success
57.4%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
2.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.7758 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
debris5–90.0513%10 Nov →
inferno6–9-0.0341%10 Nov →
inferno7–9-0.0428%7 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.049%6 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.0013%23 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0738%18 Oct →
anubis7–130.0113%17 Oct →
anubis13–90.0627%17 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0122%17 Oct →
inferno9–70.0530%14 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0632%14 Oct →
inferno9–60.1426%14 Oct →
mirage13–50.1739%14 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0564%14 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.1213%14 Oct →
overpass5–9-0.1117%12 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0914%12 Oct →
debris3–9-0.1621%12 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0240%10 Oct →
vertigo3–9-0.1426%10 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0635%10 Oct →
debris3–9-0.2226%10 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0331%10 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1019%10 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.139%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0424%27 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0117%26 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.039%26 Sept →
inferno9–60.0020%26 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0522%26 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.0733%26 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.0150%26 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0547%26 Sept →
inferno9–40.0829%26 Sept →
inferno9–30.0924%26 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.0115%26 Sept →
debris8–8-0.0545%26 Sept →
inferno5–90.0333%26 Sept →
inferno7–90.0229%26 Sept →
inferno7–90.0416%26 Sept →
inferno9–60.0140%26 Sept →
inferno9–60.0226%26 Sept →
inferno9–70.0839%26 Sept →
inferno9–20.0247%26 Sept →
ancient9–130.0020%26 Sept →
debris4–9-0.0411%25 Sept →
debris5–9-0.0216%25 Sept →
debris6–9-0.0427%25 Sept →
debris8–80.0532%25 Sept →
debris9–6-0.0324%25 Sept →
debris9–20.1333%25 Sept →
debris9–6-0.0426%25 Sept →
debris5–90.0819%25 Sept →
debris9–30.0121%25 Sept →
debris8–8-0.0918%25 Sept →
debris6–90.049%25 Sept →
debris6–90.0731%25 Sept →
debris9–30.2052%25 Sept →
debris9–40.0123%25 Sept →
debris5–90.0927%24 Sept →
debris9–7-0.0426%24 Sept →
debris6–9-0.1221%24 Sept →
debris9–7-0.0330%24 Sept →
debris9–40.1630%24 Sept →
debris9–40.2247%24 Sept →
debris9–50.1135%24 Sept →
debris6–00.2262%24 Sept →
debris8–8-0.0124%24 Sept →
debris9–50.1423%24 Sept →
debris4–9-0.0735%24 Sept →
debris9–7-0.0230%24 Sept →
debris9–7-0.0129%24 Sept →
debris5–9-0.0910%24 Sept →
debris8–80.1330%24 Sept →
debris9–60.2640%24 Sept →
inferno9–70.0121%19 Sept →
inferno9–50.1414%19 Sept →
cache13–110.0121%18 Sept →
inferno9–70.0641%5 Sept →
inferno9–20.1934%5 Sept →
inferno9–50.1026%5 Sept →
nuke9–130.0227%5 Sept →
inferno13–40.1036%5 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0114%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0526%5 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0135%29 Aug →
cache13–70.0338%28 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0825%26 Aug →
inferno6–90.0524%26 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.116%23 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0519%23 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0618%22 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0017%22 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0222%16 Aug →
debris9–30.0630%14 Aug →
debris7–9-0.019%14 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0222%12 Aug →
vertigo13–6-0.0324%12 Aug →
vertigo7–130.0122%10 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.1123%10 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.