nikouS

nikouS — CS2 Stats

FI76561199111521976[U:1:1151256248]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,324Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,386Hours in CS62Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,163Top 5% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2615 of 259988 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,289 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,163 +3,812 29 Aug – 4 Nov · 18 days played
24,35128,163peak 28,16329 Aug4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,289 +0 29 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
2,2892,289peak 2,28929 Aug1 Sept
28,163Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,289Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
17Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,289
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 211 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,163
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,837 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate49.9%50.9%
Shot accuracy7.5%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.291.09
Match win rate44.8%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnikouSFACEITLevel 10 · 2,289 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,163 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,289csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning67
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateWWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 428ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time471ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 474ms → last ⅓ avg 471ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 1 Nov →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · ancient, 22 Oct →
313msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 24 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 1 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%0.00
infernoB2010–1050%0.00
ancientA1811–761%0.02
dust2C166–1038%0.01
cacheS107–370%0.01
anubisD62–433%0.03
nukeC52–340%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.02
poseidon—10–10%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

129,654Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
4,893Matches
44.8%Match win rate
49.9%Headshot %
7.5%Shot accuracy
10,969MVPs
2,367Hours (in match)
4,727Bombs planted
1,276Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4763,762
AWP10,469
MP92,510
MAC-101,835
Knife1,621

Lifetime map wins

6,010inferno
5,876dust2
3,675nuke
1,035vertigo
608train
139lake
104office
62ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

944Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
80.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient24056%1.2117.1
Dust219653%1.1416.3
Mirage18850%1.0515.1
Inferno10047%1.0414.8
Nuke8148%1.0916.4
Anubis7653%1.0415.4
Overpass2446%1.0618.0
Cache650%0.9815.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.1%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
468msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
56.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
9.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4819 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4746% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10.0821%4 Nov →
mirage13–90.048%4 Nov →
cache16–130.0420%4 Nov →
ancient13–70.0724%2 Nov →
mirage13–100.017%2 Nov →
inferno13–90.0425%2 Nov →
cache3–13-0.0716%2 Nov →
dust213–00.1518%1 Nov →
ancient13–30.0214%1 Nov →
inferno16–14-0.019%1 Nov →
dust29–130.0722%31 Oct →
mirage5–130.0033%31 Oct →
anubis13–20.0320%30 Oct →
ancient13–70.0316%30 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0610%30 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0113%30 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0122%29 Oct →
mirage15–150.0310%29 Oct →
dust26–130.0116%29 Oct →
nuke13–50.0119%29 Oct →
ancient10–130.0511%29 Oct →
mirage13–10.0925%29 Oct →
overpass7–13-0.028%28 Oct →
anubis9–130.0314%28 Oct →
cache13–80.0210%27 Oct →
ancient13–20.0811%27 Oct →
ancient13–50.0517%27 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0114%27 Oct →
ancient13–60.1021%27 Oct →
ancient6–130.0531%27 Oct →
inferno13–20.1218%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0414%26 Oct →
mirage13–60.0420%26 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.088%26 Oct →
ancient13–50.0011%26 Oct →
mirage6–130.0519%26 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0117%26 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0225%26 Oct →
inferno6–2-0.0227%26 Oct →
cache9–130.0123%26 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0120%25 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0013%25 Oct →
mirage6–130.0331%25 Oct →
nuke3–8-0.047%25 Oct →
inferno13–00.0133%25 Oct →
cache13–4-0.048%25 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0111%25 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0215%25 Oct →
dust213–00.016%25 Oct →
ancient5–130.0418%25 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0121%25 Oct →
inferno11–130.0416%25 Oct →
anubis13–40.1117%25 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.064%24 Oct →
mirage13–100.018%24 Oct →
inferno8–130.0013%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0511%24 Oct →
mirage9–130.0120%24 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0124%24 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0113%24 Oct →
inferno9–130.009%24 Oct →
ancient13–100.0311%24 Oct →
dust26–130.0124%24 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0217%24 Oct →
inferno6–130.0115%24 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0313%24 Oct →
poseidon6–90.0615%24 Oct →
mirage9–130.0322%23 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0733%23 Oct →
anubis7–130.0316%23 Oct →
ancient13–110.0411%22 Oct →
ancient13–90.0537%22 Oct →
inferno9–130.0115%22 Oct →
inferno13–90.0121%22 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.048%22 Oct →
dust213–2-0.027%22 Oct →
cache13–60.0722%22 Oct →
anubis5–130.0223%22 Oct →
mirage15–150.0115%21 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0315%21 Oct →
mirage0–2-0.1333%21 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0316%21 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0514%21 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0316%21 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0321%20 Oct →
cache13–80.0323%20 Oct →
cache13–110.027%20 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0327%20 Oct →
mirage13–100.0623%20 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0310%20 Oct →
inferno13–80.0526%20 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0324%19 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0411%19 Oct →
dust211–130.0111%19 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0114%19 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0121%19 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0321%19 Oct →
dust213–110.0021%19 Oct →
dust27–130.0813%19 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0117%18 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.