Utility Uolevi

Utility Uolevi — CS2 Stats

HM76561199084889960[U:1:1124624232]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,461Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,656Hours in CS60Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,400Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65627 of 261628 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,051 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+255Premier CS Rating · 21,145 → 21,400

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,400 -939 6 Sept – 15 Nov · 11 days played
21,14522,557peak 22,5576 Sept15 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,051 +0 6 Sept – 9 Nov · 4 observations
1,0511,051peak 1,0516 Sept9 Nov
22,811Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,051Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,051
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 150 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,157 below peak (22,557)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,600 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches39——
Win rate54%——
K/D1.10——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 9 Nov 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.1%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy9.7%13.0%13.2%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.061.07meets
Match win rate45.5%46.3%46.9%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUtility UoleviFACEITLevel 8 · 1,051 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,400 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,051csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning69
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–36–5Last 10059%Win rateWLWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.7
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time529ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–4 · vertigo, 24 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · overpass, 3 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 1 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1913–668%0.02
infernoB179–853%0.02
anubisB137–654%0.01
vertigoA138–562%0.04
ancientS107–370%0.00
cacheB84–450%0.02
overpassC73–443%0.01
mirageS64–267%-0.01
dust2C52–340%-0.02
office—11–0100%0.02
train—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,157Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,336Matches
45.5%Match win rate
51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9.7%Shot accuracy
11,103MVPs
931Hours (in match)
2,198Bombs planted
1,118Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,580vertigo
3,565nuke
3,078inferno
2,668dust2
1,661cbble
766train
394office
227lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

144Matches
56%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
93.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3658%1.4219.7
Mirage2148%1.2518.5
Dust22157%1.1718.4
Inferno1953%1.1818.8
Ancient1953%1.2617.9
Anubis1155%1.1217.9
Overpass875%1.5722.8
Cache771%1.7922.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
524msReaction time
70.3%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
9.42HE damage / grenade
6.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–2-0.0413%15 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0019%15 Nov →
nuke13–80.0525%14 Nov →
nuke13–70.0116%14 Nov →
inferno13–40.0229%14 Nov →
anubis0–13-0.0811%13 Nov →
ancient0–13-0.0025%13 Nov →
nuke16–140.0338%13 Nov →
cache13–90.0821%13 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0223%13 Nov →
nuke13–60.0724%13 Nov →
inferno3–130.1032%13 Nov →
dust28–130.0119%13 Nov →
nuke13–50.2322%13 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0321%13 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.038%13 Nov →
mirage5–130.0123%13 Nov →
anubis16–140.1121%13 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0819%12 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0523%12 Nov →
ancient13–110.0316%12 Nov →
mirage13–60.0012%12 Nov →
nuke13–70.0720%12 Nov →
mirage13–50.0325%12 Nov →
overpass9–13-0.0414%12 Nov →
inferno3–13-0.0517%12 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0810%12 Nov →
anubis13–80.0818%12 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0111%10 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0333%10 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0319%10 Nov →
cache13–60.0519%10 Nov →
inferno13–100.0227%9 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0116%9 Nov →
inferno13–40.0222%9 Nov →
ancient13–30.0218%9 Nov →
inferno10–130.0127%8 Nov →
nuke14–16-0.0320%8 Nov →
nuke2–130.0216%7 Nov →
cache1–13-0.0214%7 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0319%6 Nov →
mirage16–14-0.0214%6 Nov →
ancient8–130.0314%6 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0534%6 Nov →
vertigo13–70.0816%6 Nov →
office13–110.0224%5 Nov →
vertigo13–80.1029%5 Nov →
inferno12–120.0421%5 Nov →
vertigo11–13-0.0123%4 Nov →
vertigo13–80.0115%4 Nov →
nuke13–80.0924%4 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0611%4 Nov →
nuke13–50.0116%4 Nov →
cache12–12-0.0114%4 Nov →
vertigo13–80.0930%4 Nov →
anubis12–12-0.068%3 Nov →
anubis13–5-0.038%3 Nov →
nuke13–40.0914%3 Nov →
ancient13–5-0.0120%3 Nov →
overpass4–13-0.0445%3 Nov →
vertigo13–70.0215%3 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0228%3 Nov →
inferno13–80.0321%2 Nov →
overpass13–80.1421%2 Nov →
inferno13–60.0110%2 Nov →
cache12–120.0422%2 Nov →
overpass13–50.0617%1 Nov →
vertigo5–130.0320%1 Nov →
vertigo13–7-0.0224%1 Nov →
nuke13–6-0.0128%1 Nov →
inferno13–3-0.0415%1 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.0412%1 Nov →
vertigo13–3-0.0922%1 Nov →
vertigo8–13-0.0014%31 Oct →
cache13–100.0117%31 Oct →
overpass13–20.028%31 Oct →
nuke11–130.0925%31 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0224%30 Oct →
inferno6–130.0616%29 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0114%29 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.008%28 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0725%28 Oct →
nuke13–70.0110%28 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0018%27 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0514%26 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0119%26 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0113%25 Oct →
overpass5–13-0.0720%25 Oct →
anubis13–40.0214%25 Oct →
inferno5–130.0725%25 Oct →
anubis7–120.0611%24 Oct →
overpass12–120.0315%24 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.0916%24 Oct →
vertigo9–40.2529%24 Oct →
inferno9–20.1621%24 Oct →
inferno13–90.0115%24 Oct →
anubis13–10.1617%23 Oct →
dust213–90.028%23 Oct →
ancient13–110.0417%23 Oct →
train13–50.0211%23 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.