LeulGaming

LeulGaming — CS2 Stats

76561199068204064[U:1:1107938336]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,941Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,207Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,022 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (73 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,022 → 2,022
+30Tracked matches · now 1,941
−3.3ppWin rate · 63.3% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,769 -2,185 15 Mar – 5 Jul · 14 days played
17,76922,118peak 22,11815 Mar5 Jul
22,118Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,022Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-01-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,022
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 478 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.5%48.2%50.9%5.4% short
Shot accuracy12.3%13.2%13.7%1.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.161.071.09above
Match win rate50.6%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeulGamingFACEITLevel 9 · 2,022 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,022csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning68
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–39–3Last 10058%Win rateLLWLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.4pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.0
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time586ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 15 Jul →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 18 Jun →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 8 May →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 52% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2816–1257%0.02
anubisB2111–1052%0.00
infernoB137–654%0.00
dust2A117–464%-0.01
ancientS75–271%0.02
nukeS55–0100%0.07
vertigo—30–30%-0.04
poseidon—32–167%0.10
debris—31–233%-0.07
cache—21–150%-0.00
overpass—22–0100%0.04
eldorado—11–0100%0.14
train—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (52% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,961Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
4,300Matches
50.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
45.5%Headshot %
12.3%Shot accuracy
13,237MVPs
1,991Hours (in match)
3,961Bombs planted
1,506Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,007
AWP11,146
MAC-102,637
MP92,401
SSG 082,257

Lifetime map wins

7,688inferno
5,089dust2
2,634nuke
2,347vertigo
853train
50office
39lake
32cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,166Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23348%1.1817.1
Anubis13455%1.2016.0
Dust211049%1.0714.6
Inferno9756%1.2216.1
Ancient8251%0.9815.2
Nuke3749%0.9915.1
Vertigo1233%0.8012.9
Train1050%0.9914.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
549msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
13.04HE damage / grenade
5.90Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo6–90.0516%10 Nov →
inferno1–9-0.2929%10 Nov →
cache13–70.0513%7 Nov →
anubis9–130.0620%6 Nov →
vertigo11–13-0.057%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.0918%16 Sept →
inferno13–110.1117%10 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0210%7 Sept →
inferno13–70.0619%6 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0921%4 Sept →
mirage4–90.0511%3 Sept →
mirage0–7-0.0128%2 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0227%16 Aug →
anubis13–110.0330%13 Aug →
anubis13–60.0429%13 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0621%12 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0326%11 Aug →
mirage13–30.0516%8 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0528%2 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0218%1 Aug →
anubis13–90.0016%1 Aug →
poseidon6–90.0330%20 Jul →
poseidon9–60.1422%20 Jul →
poseidon9–40.1214%20 Jul →
vertigo4–9-0.1118%20 Jul →
debris5–9-0.0828%20 Jul →
eldorado9–40.1425%16 Jul →
debris9–5-0.0919%16 Jul →
debris8–8-0.054%15 Jul →
nuke9–60.0626%15 Jul →
mirage13–10.0027%15 Jul →
ancient13–20.2227%15 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0324%5 Jul →
mirage7–130.0627%5 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0313%5 Jul →
overpass13–30.0620%5 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0616%2 Jul →
mirage13–10.2124%21 Jun →
inferno6–10.070%21 Jun →
nuke13–70.1118%21 Jun →
nuke13–50.0323%21 Jun →
inferno7–90.0224%20 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.017%20 Jun →
inferno13–60.0418%20 Jun →
overpass13–100.0225%19 Jun →
inferno13–100.0313%19 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0313%19 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0619%18 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0038%18 Jun →
mirage13–50.1024%11 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0527%6 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0212%27 May →
inferno13–160.0325%26 May →
anubis10–130.0410%23 May →
mirage13–40.0921%23 May →
cache8–13-0.068%17 May →
mirage13–60.0219%9 May →
mirage2–13-0.0815%8 May →
dust213–90.0331%29 Apr →
mirage12–160.0223%27 Apr →
mirage13–70.0116%26 Apr →
inferno7–130.0218%25 Apr →
ancient13–90.025%24 Apr →
anubis13–50.0122%24 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0024%17 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.1215%17 Apr →
mirage13–90.0424%14 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.0816%29 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.039%29 Mar →
mirage13–30.0613%27 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0225%27 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0913%25 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0120%25 Mar →
dust213–70.0438%25 Mar →
anubis13–70.0614%21 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0523%18 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0311%15 Mar →
anubis13–60.0822%15 Mar →
dust213–50.0322%15 Mar →
nuke13–50.0629%11 Mar →
train2–130.0215%11 Mar →
mirage13–100.0820%11 Mar →
dust213–70.0015%11 Mar →
mirage2–100.0135%11 Mar →
inferno13–80.0728%8 Mar →
inferno12–120.0220%7 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0221%25 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0113%20 Feb →
ancient13–70.0620%19 Feb →
mirage13–40.0723%19 Feb →
anubis12–12-0.036%18 Feb →
anubis13–40.0715%18 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.078%17 Feb →
anubis13–90.0219%14 Feb →
mirage13–20.0214%14 Feb →
ancient13–50.0219%9 Feb →
anubis13–8-0.0119%5 Feb →
anubis9–130.0319%4 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0113%30 Jan →
anubis3–130.002%30 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.