SonZinox

SonZinox — CS2 Stats

76561199246491682[U:1:1286225954]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

465Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,617 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,536 +4,870 19 Sept – 6 May · 23 days played
10,21716,907peak 16,90719 Sept6 May
16,907Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,617Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2025-06-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,617
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 134 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSonZinoxFACEITLevel 7 · 1,617 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,617csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning54
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −7.3pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time617ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 5 Mar →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · inferno, 8 Jan →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 30 Dec →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 31dust2Weakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3117–1455%0.03
dust2C198–1142%-0.01
anubisB137–654%0.04
infernoB126–650%0.03
ancientB84–450%0.00
nukeB84–450%0.02
vertigo—42–250%0.01
cache—21–150%-0.05
office—21–150%0.01
train—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

456Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
82.3ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14551%1.1316.0
Inferno6052%1.1116.1
Anubis5859%1.3218.3
Dust25859%1.2416.9
Ancient3847%0.9315.7
Nuke2348%1.0716.0
Overpass1258%1.2315.6
Train838%1.0115.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
610msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
6.81HE damage / grenade
10.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3515 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7708% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–4-0.0621%31 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0319%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0027%10 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0320%18 Sept →
mirage13–30.0732%8 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0424%7 May →
inferno3–13-0.0921%6 May →
inferno7–13-0.0310%25 Apr →
ancient13–90.0123%24 Apr →
anubis13–50.0417%24 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0815%24 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0617%18 Apr →
dust21–13-0.0941%18 Apr →
anubis13–70.0516%17 Apr →
nuke13–50.1124%17 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0053%17 Apr →
vertigo1–9-0.0327%8 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0353%8 Apr →
vertigo13–6-0.0121%8 Apr →
vertigo13–60.1119%8 Apr →
dust22–13-0.0725%8 Apr →
mirage13–60.0415%7 Apr →
inferno13–60.0930%6 Apr →
mirage13–50.1021%6 Apr →
nuke11–130.0439%3 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0420%3 Apr →
dust213–30.1123%3 Apr →
anubis8–130.0023%1 Apr →
anubis9–130.1621%1 Apr →
anubis13–80.1321%30 Mar →
ancient9–130.0613%26 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0320%25 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0119%25 Mar →
dust213–70.0819%25 Mar →
nuke13–6-0.0221%25 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0616%24 Mar →
office13–100.0317%22 Mar →
anubis13–70.0213%21 Mar →
nuke16–120.0321%21 Mar →
inferno6–130.0119%18 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0422%18 Mar →
mirage13–110.0715%15 Mar →
anubis13–6-0.019%15 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0219%15 Mar →
mirage13–160.0921%13 Mar →
nuke13–5-0.0617%11 Mar →
train2–13-0.047%11 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0619%11 Mar →
dust213–70.0027%11 Mar →
mirage2–10-0.0120%11 Mar →
mirage7–130.0924%10 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0327%8 Mar →
mirage9–130.0019%6 Mar →
ancient13–40.0319%6 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0327%6 Mar →
inferno8–80.0915%5 Mar →
nuke8–80.0115%5 Mar →
inferno9–30.2434%5 Mar →
mirage0–120.0132%5 Mar →
inferno13–4-0.0724%1 Mar →
mirage7–130.0227%1 Mar →
anubis16–140.1015%22 Feb →
mirage13–100.0420%22 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0121%21 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0129%14 Feb →
ancient13–50.0528%9 Feb →
office12–12-0.0230%25 Jan →
dust23–13-0.0517%23 Jan →
ancient4–13-0.0118%8 Jan →
inferno2–00.2060%8 Jan →
ancient3–13-0.050%30 Dec →
nuke11–130.0220%30 Dec →
mirage13–70.0322%27 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.0328%14 Dec →
anubis13–80.0129%14 Dec →
mirage13–70.0323%10 Nov →
mirage5–130.1231%28 Oct →
mirage13–110.0315%25 Oct →
mirage13–60.0518%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0033%19 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0319%18 Sept →
mirage13–20.0634%8 Sept →
dust21–80.0422%30 Aug →
mirage13–30.1031%24 Aug →
dust213–90.1223%23 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0217%23 Aug →
anubis12–120.0212%22 Aug →
inferno13–70.0626%20 Aug →
mirage12–120.0021%20 Aug →
mirage13–110.0324%16 Aug →
dust28–130.0234%15 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0335%15 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0118%13 Aug →
mirage11–130.0229%13 Aug →
mirage13–10.1019%11 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0419%9 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0421%7 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0911%28 Jun →
mirage11–130.0211%26 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0421%25 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.