~Peter~

~Peter~ — CS2 Stats

DK76561199059407513[U:1:1099141785]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,434Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,208Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,862Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34437 of 261545 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,924 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,862 +3,308 4 Sept – 11 Nov · 18 days played
20,55425,318peak 25,3184 Sept11 Nov
25,647Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,372Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-09-04

Faceit ELO

  • 448 below peak (2,372)
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 77 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,456 below peak (25,318)
  • -350 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,138 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate43.0%50.9%
Shot accuracy10.9%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.311.09
Match win rate50.6%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GG~Peter~FACEITLevel 10 · 1,924 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,862 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,372csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning60
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–38–7Last 10055%Win rateLWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.5
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time571ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 4–13 · anubis, 11 Oct →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · anubis, 30 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 24 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 31 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 44% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC2511–1444%-0.00
mirageA2515–1060%0.02
cacheS1812–667%0.02
nukeA159–660%0.00
ancientB63–350%0.00
dust2B63–350%0.01
train—21–150%0.02
inferno—20–20%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,822Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
4,232Matches
50.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
43.0%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
11,859MVPs
2,130Hours (in match)
4,385Bombs planted
1,485Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,363
AWP17,542
P2501,167
Knife1,150
MP91,102

Lifetime map wins

2,633inferno
2,180nuke
1,671vertigo
1,198train
1,147dust2
147cbble
14office
1ar_monastery

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

593Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
73.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12957%1.1416.4
Anubis7757%1.0915.1
Ancient5439%0.9113.8
Nuke4445%0.9413.6
Vertigo3358%1.0413.7
Inferno2352%1.1115.5
Dust21741%1.2815.9
Cache1662%1.1114.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
567msReaction time
42.7%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
10.53HE damage / grenade
8.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4255 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0528%11 Nov →
cache13–80.0117%11 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0529%11 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0222%8 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0625%6 Nov →
anubis8–130.0319%5 Nov →
cache13–100.0529%5 Nov →
mirage6–130.0214%4 Nov →
cache13–70.1011%4 Nov →
anubis13–60.0614%3 Nov →
cache13–80.0619%3 Nov →
mirage7–130.0223%3 Nov →
mirage13–100.0125%31 Oct →
mirage13–20.0636%31 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0211%31 Oct →
train8–130.0126%29 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0624%29 Oct →
nuke16–120.0320%29 Oct →
anubis13–90.0316%29 Oct →
mirage13–40.0926%28 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0239%28 Oct →
mirage13–40.1219%28 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0822%28 Oct →
anubis13–80.0925%28 Oct →
mirage6–130.0532%27 Oct →
mirage13–70.0325%27 Oct →
mirage13–70.1422%26 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0418%25 Oct →
mirage13–30.0924%25 Oct →
mirage8–10.0133%25 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0621%25 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0318%25 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0323%25 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0530%25 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0631%25 Oct →
nuke13–80.0114%25 Oct →
ancient13–40.0625%25 Oct →
mirage13–60.0219%25 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0630%24 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0115%24 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0233%22 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0218%21 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0326%21 Oct →
cache13–30.0325%21 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0620%19 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0129%19 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0116%19 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0422%18 Oct →
nuke6–130.0316%18 Oct →
anubis13–40.0431%18 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0124%18 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0515%18 Oct →
ancient13–80.0219%17 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0027%17 Oct →
nuke13–40.0213%17 Oct →
nuke13–90.0722%17 Oct →
anubis16–130.0114%17 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0123%17 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0420%17 Oct →
mirage13–90.0320%17 Oct →
cache12–120.1025%14 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0320%14 Oct →
mirage12–160.0326%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0329%13 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0114%12 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0227%12 Oct →
mirage13–110.0018%12 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.029%12 Oct →
cache13–40.0230%12 Oct →
anubis4–130.1626%11 Oct →
mirage13–110.0527%11 Oct →
inferno4–100.069%11 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0321%7 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0112%7 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0312%7 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0716%4 Oct →
nuke13–100.0237%4 Oct →
train13–30.0426%4 Oct →
dust213–110.1321%4 Oct →
cache13–50.0714%4 Oct →
anubis16–120.0320%4 Oct →
cache13–80.0115%4 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0114%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0058%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0323%30 Sept →
dust213–110.0330%30 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0325%29 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0615%25 Sept →
cache13–70.0118%23 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0626%23 Sept →
dust29–130.0018%21 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0115%20 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0118%19 Sept →
anubis12–120.0123%19 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0612%18 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0318%18 Sept →
cache13–90.1216%16 Sept →
anubis12–120.0015%16 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0224%14 Sept →
nuke13–110.1319%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.