HÅBFULD#Cardigan

HÅBFULD#Cardigan — CS2 Stats

DK76561199051856585[U:1:1091590857]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

11,231Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
12,399Hours in CS93Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,765 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,765 → 1,765
+36Tracked matches · now 11,231
+10.0ppWin rate · 33.3% → 43.3%

Rating over time

1,765Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,765
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 236 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-10-20
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-10-20

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches59——
Win rate54%——
K/D0.93——
Headshot %38%——

Measured 20 Oct 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate38.9%48.2%50.9%12.0% short
Shot accuracy7.8%13.2%13.7%5.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.071.090.18 short
Match win rate45.7%46.9%48.4%2.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHÅBFULD#CardiganFACEITLevel 9 · 1,765 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,765csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning53
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–60–2Last 10038%Win rateWLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +77ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility6.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.3
Utility6.8
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time576ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 8–8 · inferno, 30 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 1–8 · nuke, 8 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 12 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 24mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2813–1546%-0.01
infernoB2412–1250%-0.00
ancientD215–1624%-0.01
mirageD71–614%-0.03
vertigoD72–529%-0.01
anubisB63–350%0.01
cacheD51–420%-0.03
dust2—21–150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

236,632Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
13,543Matches
45.7%Match win rate
38.9%Headshot %
7.8%Shot accuracy
29,739MVPs
6,138Hours (in match)
17,420Bombs planted
3,314Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4754,988
MAC-1030,725
MP920,775
AWP11,116
Tec-96,809
AUG6,051

Lifetime map wins

39,698nuke
39,603inferno
19,105vertigo
3,159train
2,592dust2
205cbble
145lake
53office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,903Matches
49%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
79.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno170149%1.0515.4
Nuke154260%1.1416.0
Ancient150649%1.0515.7
Vertigo64751%1.0415.4
Anubis50937%0.9615.2
Overpass27342%0.9915.7
Train26044%1.0116.3
Mirage13329%0.8412.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
65.5%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
566msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
9.64HE damage / grenade
17.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0888° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7526% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0414%25 Oct →
ancient5–130.0114%23 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0018%23 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0511%23 Oct →
dust216–140.0319%23 Oct →
inferno13–110.0317%23 Oct →
ancient6–130.0321%22 Oct →
inferno19–17-0.0012%22 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0213%22 Oct →
nuke22–200.007%22 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0716%21 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.058%17 Oct →
nuke10–130.0111%15 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0318%14 Oct →
inferno13–40.1219%14 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0516%13 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.058%12 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0515%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0614%12 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0111%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0423%11 Oct →
cache13–5-0.017%8 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0517%7 Oct →
inferno13–110.0016%5 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0419%5 Oct →
nuke16–120.0316%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0211%29 Sept →
anubis13–90.0513%29 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0413%29 Sept →
ancient19–150.0510%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0119%27 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0520%27 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.029%24 Sept →
ancient13–110.0513%22 Sept →
inferno13–90.0723%21 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0411%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0222%21 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0118%21 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0213%21 Sept →
cache8–13-0.097%19 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0913%19 Sept →
ancient16–190.0214%19 Sept →
inferno6–130.0821%18 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.056%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0415%16 Sept →
nuke13–30.0211%15 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0112%14 Sept →
nuke1–8-0.0433%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0210%8 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0420%8 Sept →
anubis16–140.0520%7 Sept →
nuke14–160.039%5 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0713%4 Sept →
nuke13–40.038%4 Sept →
nuke5–130.0012%4 Sept →
ancient11–130.0014%1 Sept →
nuke13–30.087%31 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0714%30 Aug →
inferno8–80.2030%30 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.2021%30 Aug →
inferno9–40.1216%30 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1919%30 Aug →
inferno9–20.0920%30 Aug →
vertigo7–130.0122%26 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0417%26 Aug →
nuke13–90.028%25 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0212%24 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0212%23 Aug →
inferno13–110.016%23 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0316%23 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0317%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.019%21 Aug →
nuke11–130.005%20 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0220%19 Aug →
nuke16–13-0.0224%19 Aug →
vertigo13–3-0.0014%19 Aug →
ancient13–40.0313%17 Aug →
nuke11–130.0717%17 Aug →
anubis13–90.0017%17 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0112%15 Aug →
ancient13–40.0818%15 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0114%15 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.1022%13 Aug →
vertigo13–90.0516%13 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0118%12 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.068%11 Aug →
inferno13–50.0624%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0217%10 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0215%10 Aug →
vertigo9–130.0114%9 Aug →
nuke13–100.0510%8 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0313%8 Aug →
ancient11–130.0613%8 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0522%7 Aug →
nuke6–9-0.0916%7 Aug →
vertigo3–9-0.0526%7 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0520%6 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0211%6 Aug →
vertigo9–13-0.0420%6 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.067%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.